Twitter , Google admit deliberately censoring infowars

[MindWars]

During a House Intelligence Committee hearing into Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election, Twitter General Counsel Sean Edgett brazenly admitted that Twitter censors Infowars stories in favor of mainstream media.
Bombshell: Twitter, Google Admit Deliberately Censoring Infowars
-------------------------------------------------------

It's been a difficult journey waking up millions of sheep who can't see any of this hiding in plain view. Die heard sheep choose to foam at the mouth when their parental Governments like Obama and Clinton tell them shit is fake when it's not they have no clue why they're told this no matter what you tell them their die hard attitudes keeps them perfect democratic slaves as they continue to eat their own on every level.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Good

 

[Hellbilly]

Good

There is no good reason for censorship on any level.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[TNHarley]

Good

There is no good reason for censorship on any level.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

True but do they need a reason?

 

[Faun]

During a House Intelligence Committee hearing into Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election, Twitter General Counsel Sean Edgett brazenly admitted that Twitter censors Infowars stories in favor of mainstream media.
Bombshell: Twitter, Google Admit Deliberately Censoring Infowars
-------------------------------------------------------

It's been a difficult journey waking up millions of sheep who can't see any of this hiding in plain view. Die heard sheep choose to foam at the mouth when their parental Governments like Obama and Clinton tell them shit is fake when it's not they have no clue why they're told this no matter what you tell them their die hard attitudes keeps them perfect democratic slaves as they continue to eat their own on every level.

So? Twitter and Google are private companies. What’s wrong with them filtering out bullshit websites?

 

[TNHarley]

During a House Intelligence Committee hearing into Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election, Twitter General Counsel Sean Edgett brazenly admitted that Twitter censors Infowars stories in favor of mainstream media.
Bombshell: Twitter, Google Admit Deliberately Censoring Infowars
-------------------------------------------------------

It's been a difficult journey waking up millions of sheep who can't see any of this hiding in plain view. Die heard sheep choose to foam at the mouth when their parental Governments like Obama and Clinton tell them shit is fake when it's not they have no clue why they're told this no matter what you tell them their die hard attitudes keeps them perfect democratic slaves as they continue to eat their own on every level.

So? Twitter and Google are private companies. What’s wrong with them filtering out bullshit websites?

Bakeries are private companies as well. I am sure you dont mind them being forced to serve people they dont want to serve with their PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Whats the difference?

 

[Dragonlady]

InfoWars is a fake news site and should be censored since idiots and Russian trolls, like the OP, use it to spread lies and conspiracy theories.

 

[TNHarley]

InfoWars is a fake news site and should be censored since idiots and Russian trolls, like the OP, use it to spread lies and conspiracy theories.

So we should ban every news agency that spreads lies? You sure about that?

 

[Faun]

During a House Intelligence Committee hearing into Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election, Twitter General Counsel Sean Edgett brazenly admitted that Twitter censors Infowars stories in favor of mainstream media.
Bombshell: Twitter, Google Admit Deliberately Censoring Infowars
-------------------------------------------------------

It's been a difficult journey waking up millions of sheep who can't see any of this hiding in plain view. Die heard sheep choose to foam at the mouth when their parental Governments like Obama and Clinton tell them shit is fake when it's not they have no clue why they're told this no matter what you tell them their die hard attitudes keeps them perfect democratic slaves as they continue to eat their own on every level.

So? Twitter and Google are private companies. What’s wrong with them filtering out bullshit websites?

Bakeries are private companies as well. I am sure you dont mind them being forced to serve people they dont want to serve with their PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Whats the difference?

Idiotic comparison.

InfoWars is not a protected class. A more apt comparison would be refusing to serve someone in your business, not based upon race, sex, or creed, but because the business perceived them as a credible threat.

 

[Faun]

InfoWars is a fake news site and should be censored since idiots and Russian trolls, like the OP, use it to spread lies and conspiracy theories.

So we should ban every news agency that spreads lies? You sure about that?

You don’t have to ban anyone. You’re not Google or Twitter.

 

[TNHarley]

During a House Intelligence Committee hearing into Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election, Twitter General Counsel Sean Edgett brazenly admitted that Twitter censors Infowars stories in favor of mainstream media.
Bombshell: Twitter, Google Admit Deliberately Censoring Infowars
-------------------------------------------------------

It's been a difficult journey waking up millions of sheep who can't see any of this hiding in plain view. Die heard sheep choose to foam at the mouth when their parental Governments like Obama and Clinton tell them shit is fake when it's not they have no clue why they're told this no matter what you tell them their die hard attitudes keeps them perfect democratic slaves as they continue to eat their own on every level.

So? Twitter and Google are private companies. What’s wrong with them filtering out bullshit websites?

Bakeries are private companies as well. I am sure you dont mind them being forced to serve people they dont want to serve with their PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Whats the difference?

Idiotic comparison.

InfoWars is not a protected class. A more apt comparison would be refusing to serve someone in your business, not based upon race, sex, or creed, but because the business perceived them as a credible threat.

Your argument was PRIVATE BUSINESS. You aint gonna move the goal posts on me, MR dishonesty.
So if a business owner perceives gays as a threat (its just as illogical as thinking a news site on the internet as being a threat) you would be ok with that?
LOL not likely
Have a good day!

 

[shockedcanadian]

I've never even been to the site as I view the host as a provocateur. Still, censorship is for dictatorships and those afraid of opposing views and theories regardless of how absurd they might be (or not be).

It appears some of these companies have been doing too much business in China, Russia and Canada, and they have forgotten about the good old US of A and it's constitution. If these companies aren't too careful, they will be called onto the carpet as Microsoft has been, they will argue and complain about the abuse of power without realizing the irony of that statement when juxtaposed to their own actions.

 

[Faun]

During a House Intelligence Committee hearing into Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election, Twitter General Counsel Sean Edgett brazenly admitted that Twitter censors Infowars stories in favor of mainstream media.
Bombshell: Twitter, Google Admit Deliberately Censoring Infowars
-------------------------------------------------------

It's been a difficult journey waking up millions of sheep who can't see any of this hiding in plain view. Die heard sheep choose to foam at the mouth when their parental Governments like Obama and Clinton tell them shit is fake when it's not they have no clue why they're told this no matter what you tell them their die hard attitudes keeps them perfect democratic slaves as they continue to eat their own on every level.

So? Twitter and Google are private companies. What’s wrong with them filtering out bullshit websites?

Bakeries are private companies as well. I am sure you dont mind them being forced to serve people they dont want to serve with their PRIVATE PROPERTY.
Whats the difference?

Idiotic comparison.

InfoWars is not a protected class. A more apt comparison would be refusing to serve someone in your business, not based upon race, sex, or creed, but because the business perceived them as a credible threat.

Your argument was PRIVATE BUSINESS. You aint gonna move the goal posts on me, MR dishonesty.
So if a business owner perceives gays as a threat (its just as illogical as thinking a news site on the internet as being a threat) you would be ok with that?
LOL not likely
Have a good day!

LOL

I didn’t move anything. Private businesses can deny service to customers if they have a valid reason and as long as they’re not discriminating against someone because of race, religion, creed or sex.

Filtering bullshit websites like InfoWars because Google and Twitter have a reasonable belief InfoWars is harmful does not violate public accommodation laws.

Furthermore, in the case of Google, InfoWars is not even a customer — so they are not being denied service.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Good

There is no good reason for censorship on any level.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Agreed. Even nuts like Jones and his followers have free speech rights

 

[depotoo]

They've been censoring conservatives and the GOP for years.

 

[Faun]

Good

There is no good reason for censorship on any level.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Agreed. Even nuts like Jones and his followers have free speech rights

Who’s stopping them from speaking?

 

[TNHarley]

Good

There is no good reason for censorship on any level.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Agreed. Even nuts like Jones and his followers have free speech rights

This particular instance has nothing to do with free speech.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Good

There is no good reason for censorship on any level.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Agreed. Even nuts like Jones and his followers have free speech rights

This particular instance has nothing to do with free speech.

Considering we are talking about private organizations, you are correct, but in principle, I don't believe in censorship unless someone is totally off the wall.

 

[MindWars]

The whole point and self questions most sheep fail to think of
" if they are doing this to them" who else are they doing it to .
Why would sheep want to be fed lies, or fabricated information published by MSM.

I mean why do you sheep get off on this and think that sources like CNN tells you true information when they've been caught red handed lying on video.

The only reason lies come out on infowars and sites like them is because some liberal blogging asshole/ liberal msm purposely put this disinformation out there to keep people from actually thinking something just might be true.

Infowars can and does back up what they find sometimes it takes awhile to prove it , either way they don't put bs lies out there msm got you all fkn believe the wrong bs lmao.

 

[MindWars]

The average brains know better than to trust these sources :

Poll: Most Americans Don’t Trust ABC, CBS, NBC, NYT, WaPo, LAT