Turning the re-opening rationale on its head.

berg80

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2017
14,914
12,341
2,320
"The data also suggests that economic relief measures have done little for small businesses: Stimulus spending tended to go to Amazon or Walmart, not small local stores, and small businesses eligible for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans are generally not any better off than ones that were not eligible.

And researchers who developed the data found official orders “reopening” states do not increase economic activity, and so appear to endanger public health without any economic benefit.

The picture that emerges in a new working paper based on the economists’ findings is of an economy frozen in place. Simply declaring the economy “reopened” does not seem to do anything to spur high-income people to spend more, and it’s not clear that anything can until the real threat passes."


Optimism surrounding re-opening certainly helped the stock market rebound. Just not the real economy underlying it.
 
 
"The data also suggests that economic relief measures have done little for small businesses: Stimulus spending tended to go to Amazon or Walmart, not small local stores, and small businesses eligible for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans are generally not any better off than ones that were not eligible.

And researchers who developed the data found official orders “reopening” states do not increase economic activity, and so appear to endanger public health without any economic benefit.

The picture that emerges in a new working paper based on the economists’ findings is of an economy frozen in place. Simply declaring the economy “reopened” does not seem to do anything to spur high-income people to spend more, and it’s not clear that anything can until the real threat passes."


Optimism surrounding re-opening certainly helped the stock market rebound. Just not the real economy underlying it.
Stock market is the darling of the riche and the right. Most everybody else has to work in the underlying economy and take their chances, they won't pick up coronavirus and take home with them and at same time infect parents and grand parents.
 
Is this the premise of this thread and the underlying article:
re-engaging in econonic activity, after FORCIBLY NOT engaging in economic activity, does not increase economic activity.

That's like saying: having sex, after NOT having sex for awhile, does not increase having sex.

Genius.

.
 
"The data also suggests that economic relief measures have done little for small businesses: Stimulus spending tended to go to Amazon or Walmart, not small local stores, and small businesses eligible for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans are generally not any better off than ones that were not eligible.

And researchers who developed the data found official orders “reopening” states do not increase economic activity, and so appear to endanger public health without any economic benefit.

The picture that emerges in a new working paper based on the economists’ findings is of an economy frozen in place. Simply declaring the economy “reopened” does not seem to do anything to spur high-income people to spend more, and it’s not clear that anything can until the real threat passes."


Optimism surrounding re-opening certainly helped the stock market rebound. Just not the real economy underlying it.
I know a lot of small business owners and they use Amazon to make money.
Of course you're too stupid to realize how stupid you are.
 
"The data also suggests that economic relief measures have done little for small businesses: Stimulus spending tended to go to Amazon or Walmart, not small local stores, and small businesses eligible for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans are generally not any better off than ones that were not eligible.

And researchers who developed the data found official orders “reopening” states do not increase economic activity, and so appear to endanger public health without any economic benefit.

The picture that emerges in a new working paper based on the economists’ findings is of an economy frozen in place. Simply declaring the economy “reopened” does not seem to do anything to spur high-income people to spend more, and it’s not clear that anything can until the real threat passes."


Optimism surrounding re-opening certainly helped the stock market rebound. Just not the real economy underlying it.

Is it fair to say we can reduce this "fraction" to "Orange Man evil?"
 
"The data also suggests that economic relief measures have done little for small businesses: Stimulus spending tended to go to Amazon or Walmart, not small local stores, and small businesses eligible for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans are generally not any better off than ones that were not eligible.

And researchers who developed the data found official orders “reopening” states do not increase economic activity, and so appear to endanger public health without any economic benefit.

The picture that emerges in a new working paper based on the economists’ findings is of an economy frozen in place. Simply declaring the economy “reopened” does not seem to do anything to spur high-income people to spend more, and it’s not clear that anything can until the real threat passes."


Optimism surrounding re-opening certainly helped the stock market rebound. Just not the real economy underlying it.
I know many self employed and small businesses that received PPP loans.

The forgiveness requirements were recently changed so that forgiveness of the loans is even easier to qualify for
 
"The data also suggests that economic relief measures have done little for small businesses: Stimulus spending tended to go to Amazon or Walmart, not small local stores, and small businesses eligible for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans are generally not any better off than ones that were not eligible.

And researchers who developed the data found official orders “reopening” states do not increase economic activity, and so appear to endanger public health without any economic benefit.

The picture that emerges in a new working paper based on the economists’ findings is of an economy frozen in place. Simply declaring the economy “reopened” does not seem to do anything to spur high-income people to spend more, and it’s not clear that anything can until the real threat passes."


Optimism surrounding re-opening certainly helped the stock market rebound. Just not the real economy underlying it.

The picture that emerges in a new working paper based on the economists’ findings is of an economy frozen in place. Simply declaring the economy “reopened” does not seem to do anything to spur high-income people to spend more,

But it spurs less than high-income people to spend more, so that's something.
 

Forum List

Back
Top