Tulsi Gabbard Accuses Obama, More Of Knowingly Creating False Intel After Trump's 2016 Win

Your explanation was just plain wrong. That is YOUR problem. I have told you why it is wrong and you keep coming back with the same BS.
I’ve said nothing wrong. You have no idea what you are talking about.
 
You seem to have lost all self control over the thought that Barack Obama could be compelled to testify in front of a grand jury about the Russiagate hoax.
Please explain, for about the 10th time, why he would have to testify? All he has to do is take the 5th, so you cannot do a damned thing! If you grant him immunity, he cannot be charged later with perjury, dumbass!
 
I do think the grand jury will have to hear his testimony, since he ordered this criminal conspiracy into existence.

Is that before or after nonexistent investigation? :icon_rolleyes:
 
Please explain, for about the 10th time, why he would have to testify? All he has to do is take the 5th

The whole scenario is a fantasy.

Even setting aside glaring problems in DNI's stupid referral, as per our rightwing SCOTUS ruling, DOJ can't even investigate, never mind prosecute presidential acts.
 
Last edited:
Please explain, for about the 10th time, why he would have to testify? All he has to do is take the 5th, so you cannot do a damned thing! If you grant him immunity, he cannot be charged later with perjury, dumbass!

As I said, you don't understand what you're talking about. If he were granted immunity, it would be for past crimes.
If he commits perjury, that would be a new crime with no immunity.
 
You can pretend that Russiagate isn't being investigated, if you wish.

What specifically are you claiming is being investigated?

President Obama giving some sort of order to his gov subordinates?

It is not, because that's a clearly presidential act and can't even be investigated as per our rightwing POTUS ruling.
 
Last edited:
What specifically are you claiming is being investigated?

President Obama giving some sort of order to his gov subordinates?

It is not, because that's a clearly presidential act and can't even be investigated as per our rightwing POTUS ruling.

We'll see if the SCOTUS gives Obama a pass for criminal Watergate like crimes in office.
 
15th post

We'll see if the SCOTUS gives Obama a pass for criminal Watergate like crimes in office.

Oh my oh my, a subpoena?

After Trump basically shit on all of the congressional subpoenas and simply refused to testify? That ship has sailed.

 

We'll see if the SCOTUS gives Obama a pass for criminal Watergate like crimes in office.

You’re still talking about this?

Saying the president is colluding with the intelligence agencies is pretty stupid. It’s like saying the football coach is colluding with their offensive line.

There’s very little chance Obama would have to testify before anyone.
 
You’re still talking about this?

Saying the president is colluding with the intelligence agencies is pretty stupid. It’s like saying the football coach is colluding with their offensive line.

There’s very little chance Obama would have to testify before anyone.

Obama was the head of this criminal conspiracy.
 
Back
Top Bottom