Trump's second term is being nullified by rinky dink regional federal judges, so he deserves a do over, i.e. to have another second term.

[forkup]

District courts do NOT have Constitutional authority.

My argument isn't that the district courts can't rule on constitutionality

Your argument is so incoherent that you can't even keep it straight yourself in a single couple of paragraphs post.

They are NOT created as "co-equal" by the Constitution, they were created by congress

They are confirmed by the Senate, just like any other federal judge. And it is the judicial Branch not SCOTUS that is co-equal. A branch they belong to. To suggest otherwise shows a complete lack of understanding of how separation of powers work, or a willingness to simply lie about it.

but that a single district can make a "nationwide injunction" that limits a president's Article 2 authority.

Nationwide injunctions have been around since 1963. Not a single time has any Supreme Court decided that doing so was unconstitutional.

What we have is your opinion. An opinion flying in the face of facts, history, and dare I say, me believing that you are being honest.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

kyzr, stop embarrassing yourself.

Go read up about our judiciary system and how it works, please.

 

[kyzr]

Your argument is so incoherent that you can't even keep it straight yourself in a single couple of paragraphs post.
They are confirmed by the Senate, just like any other federal judge. And it is the judicial Branch not SCOTUS that is co-equal. A branch they belong to. To suggest otherwise shows a complete lack of understanding of how separation of powers work, or a willingness to simply lie about it.
Nationwide injunctions have been around since 1963. Not a single time has any Supreme Court decided that doing so was unconstitutional.
What we have is your opinion. An opinion flying in the face of facts, history, and dare I say, me believing that you are being honest.

You are correct that my posts are just my "opinions".

More succinctly put, "if they came in illegally, they can go out illegally". In spite of district judges ruling on the AEA.

Maybe Trump would have more luck deporting illegals using Clinton's Law?

Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Former United States President Bill Clinton asserted that the legislation strengthened "the rule of law by cracking down on illegal immigration at the border, in the workplace, and in the criminal justice system — without punishing those living in the United States legally".<a href="Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a> However, IIRAIRA has been criticized as overly punitive "by eliminating due process from the overwhelming majority of removal cases and curtailing equitable relief from removal"