Trump's picks for his 2nd presidency thread

[Luckyone]

Did the candidate you voted for in the primary make it to the general election?

I do not see the reason for this question of yours. It does not apply to the OP or to what is being discussed.

Are you simply looking for anything that you can debase and prove my evaluation of the situation being wrong?

Shame on you. You are not a debator interested in discussing issues but a Trump minion trying to be just like him.

 

[Luckyone]

I won't root for land mines that are going to blowing the legs off of women and children for the next 20 years.

That's your game, you fucking sick warmonger.

You won't root for land mines? then why did you root (and vote for) the biggest land mine in the world.............Trump?

He is going to blow the heads of everyone that did not vote for him (just like Putin is blowing the heads of innocent Ukrainian women and children that do not support him).

You are a total hypocrite

 

[sealybobo]

I won't root for land mines that are going to blowing the legs off of women and children for the next 20 years.

That's your game, you fucking sick warmonger.

So land mines bad but razor wire good? Doesn't Ukraine have a constitutional right to protect itself? It's border??? What do you think razor wire does to women and children?

Gov. Greg Abbott’s disregard of a Supreme Court order to comply with federal agents at the southern border isn’t making fellow Texas Republicans nervous. It’s making them even bigger fans of the governor’s aggressive posture.
The state is embroiled in two major court battles with DOJ over its use of razor wire and floating buoys designed to block migrants from entry, leading to an intensifying standoff between Texas and the Biden administration. The enforcement effort — and the migrant crisis itself — has sparked nationwide controversy. But it is especially acute in Texas.

The Supreme Court ruled last week that federal border patrol agents may remove razor wire Texas had installed along the U.S.-Mexico border while DOJ sues the state over access to the border. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals will rehear a separate case involving access and river border buoys in May, leaving the floating barrier in place in the meantime.

Abbott disagreed with the ruling and has vowed to “continue to defend Texas’ constitutional authority to secure the border and prevent the Biden Admin from destroying our property.”
Texas Republicans have lined up behind him at every level. They argue his actions are constitutional and accuse the Biden administration of failing to enforce existing immigration laws.
“Since March 2021, Governor Abbott has taken a series of actions in an attempt to alleviate the burden of the crisis at our southern border, but this Administration’s failed border policies have enticed migrants to continue to cross,” reads a letter sent to Attorney General Merrick Garland signed by most of the state’s GOP lawmakers last week, urging Garland to reconsider the DOJ’s lawsuit against Texas over its use of razor wire.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

I am putting up this thread where all of Trump's picks (so far as of 11/20) are shown. At this time, I am not making any comment on any of the candidates as this thread is put here so any or all of the picks can be discussed. The link enclosed below is also non-partisan as there are no political comments there either. It is just a list of all of the picks and some information about them. As any of the picks are picked individually and discussed here, we can all put our comments. Nonetheless this means that this OP itself should not raise any comments itself as it is just a list (information)

Here is the link to the list:

Tracking Trump's picks to serve in his Cabinet, administration​

I'd like to comment on your OP. Your purpose is the result of TDS, and your approach is text-book passive aggressive behavior.

 

[Hollie]

Every one of Trump's picks have one thing in common and that is loyalty to Trump. Many of the picks are not qualified for the job but qualification-for-the-job was not on Trump's list.

This is a dangerous precedent as the benefit of the citizens was not considered. This was done more for the benefit of Trump gaining Dictatorship strength with him personally being in total control of the country, no matter the needs of the populace

This is what is happening:

View attachment 1044187

I don't see you as qualified to make judgements as to any of Trump's picks. You just cut and paste cartoons.

 

[kyzr]

You mean to say that evangelicals don't need to vote in 2029? What did Trump mean by that. Explain exactly what you think he meant with this statement of his.

1. Trump said that Christianss typically don't vote as much as they should as a voting block.
2. He said if they get off their asses and vote for him in 2024 they can skip voting after that because he'll have things fixed. (paraphrasing being facetious)

 

[Luckyone]

I'd like to post on your OP. Your purpose is the result of TDS, and your approach is text-book passive aggressive behavior.

passive aggressive behavior? I call it proper and honest fighting for what is right for everyone

 

[sealybobo]

I'd like to comment on your OP. Your purpose is the result of TDS, and your approach is text-book passive aggressive behavior.
View attachment 1044326

Get used to it. Look how brilliant Trump was all this time I thought he was being ridiculous talking about less than 1% of our population. Transvestites. But boy did it resonate with voters.

So for the next 4 years, we're just going to point out each time Trump breaks the law, or appoints a pedophile to his team. How many sexual predators has he appointed so far 4?

I'm glad though. He told women, "women, I'm going to protect you like it or not". So I'm looking forward to Trump and his team "protecting" women these next 4 years. Remember George's dad invented stop short? Trump protects women by grabbing their pussies. Relax lady. I'm just protecting your vagina.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Get used to it. Look how brilliant Trump was all this time I thought he was being ridiculous talking about less than 1% of our population. Transvestites. But boy did it resonate with voters.

So for the next 4 years, we're just going to point out each time Trump breaks the law, or appoints a pedophile to his team. How many sexual predators has he appointed so far 4?

I'm glad though. He told women, "women, I'm going to protect you like it or not". So I'm looking forward to Trump and his team "protecting" women these next 4 years. Remember George's dad invented stop short? Trump protects women by grabbing their pussies. Relax lady. I'm just protecting your vagina.

11:54 in this video, am I right? I knew it.

So, I guess White Women who voted for Trump are "uneducated". Woke=educated

Cool story huh? Way to hang out a bunch of white women, I guess that's supposed to mean they're stupid. Without looking most blacks are "uneducated" by liberal standards, they still support Democrats by a great number, so which is it, education = democrat, or no education = democrat? Imagine...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What did they say? The point is, they're playing chess Democrats are playing checkers.

For example, Merrick Garland was a pussy. You think he picked on Republicans? HA!

What did they say?

The Republicans had control of the Senate after the 2014 elections.

Obama was President.

Who did the people want to appoint Supreme Court Justices?

The point is, they're playing chess Democrats are playing checkers.

The Democrats played hardball with the Court since Bork.
It took almost 30 years for the Republicans to join the game.

 

[Luckyone]

1. Trump said that Evangelicals typically don't vote as much as they should as a voting block.
2. He said if they get off their asses and vote in 2024 they can skip voting after that. (paraphrasing being facetious)

Oh I see now. So he wasn't suggesting that they do what all Americans should do (which is vote) but just to do it THIS TIME so he could win.

It feels like what is happening in Colombia and Petro. He is paying (though the guerillas he supports) for people to vote in this election that is coming up so he doesn't lose. He is not supporting voting, he is supporting people being paid to vote this time alone.

So Trump is not supporting elections in general, just supporting this one and none other............either because there will be no more elections in the future or because if there are further elections, he does not qualify for them so he just wants to be "in" this time.

and of course, he is just thinking "of the people", he has nothing to gain himself, does he?

One question for you. With Trump being a billionaire and supposedly thinking of others, why has he not given one penny of his own money to charity? Why did he talk so little about the issues the past 4 years that the American people face and so much about the legal problems he was facing himself, if he cares so much about others?

Why when he was in Miami and went to the Versailles restaurant and invited everyone there to eat on his tab and then left without paying........if he is so thoughtful of others?

 

[sealybobo]

What did they say?

The Republicans had control of the Senate after the 2014 elections.

Obama was President.

Who did the people want to appoint Supreme Court Justices?

The point is, they're playing chess Democrats are playing checkers.

The Democrats played hardball with the Court since Bork.
It took almost 30 years for the Republicans to join the game.

We should start gerrymandering states like PA

 

[kyzr]

Oh I see now. So he wasn't suggesting that they do what all Americans should do (which is vote) but just to do it THIS TIME so he could win.

It feels like what is happening in Colombia and Petro. He is paying (though the guerillas he supports) for people to vote in this election that is coming up so he doesn't lose. He is not supporting voting, he is supporting people being paid to vote this time alone.

So Trump is not supporting elections in general, just supporting this one and none other............either because there will be no more elections in the future or because if there are further elections, he does not qualify for them so he just wants to be "in" this time. and of course, he is just thinking "of the people", he has nothing to gain himself, does he?

One question for you. With Trump being a billionaire and supposedly thinking of others, why has he not given one penny of his own money to charity? Why did he talk so little about the issues the past 4 years that the American people face and so much about the legal problems he was facing himself, if he cares so much about others?

Why when he was in Miami and went to the Versailles restaurant and invited everyone there to eat on his tab and then left without paying........if he is so thoughtful of others?

Another lie. Trump typically donates $130,000,000 a year to charity. That is more than I would have given after the way the crooked DAs (elected by the "people") who vowed "to get Trump" misused "LAWFARE" to hurt Trump financially to the point of a $500,000,000 "fine" that the appeals court needs to reverse.

Vast Majority Of Trump’s Charitable Giving Reportedly Came From Land Deals

Trump reneged on several pledges to give to charity and sped up his giving after launching his 2016 campaign, a new report found.

www.forbes.com

Vast Majority Of Trump’s Charitable Giving Reportedly Came From Land Deals​

I'm sure the Versaille restaurant sent Trump the check dumbass.

 

[Nobody911]

Democrats don't like Gaetz, Tulsi, and Pete Hegseth
1. Gaetz' heterosexual sex life is no one's business. (if deviant sex by democrats is okay, so is straight sex)
2. Tulsi was on stage with Biden and Harris in 2020, and was on longer than Kamala was, to run for PRESIDENT. If she was qualified to be president, she's obviously qualified to be DNI
3. Pete Hegseth is more than qualified to be SECDEF. I just read his book "A War on Warriors", and agree with Pete's plan to fix the Pentagon.

To gauge whether most American voters disagree with a president-elect's appointments, several methods can be employed:

1. Polling: Public opinion polls are a primary tool to assess voter sentiment. Organizations like Gallup, Pew Research, and others conduct surveys that reflect how Americans view specific appointments. Tracking changes in approval ratings over time can also provide insights.

2. Focus Groups: Engaging smaller, diverse groups of voters in discussions can reveal deeper insights into public sentiment regarding appointments. These qualitative methods can uncover nuanced opinions that polls may not capture.

3. Social Media Analysis: Monitoring social media platforms can offer real-time feedback on public reaction to appointments. Analyzing trends, comments, and hashtags can provide a sense of how voters are feeling.

4. Letters to Editors and Opinion Pieces: The content and tone of opinion pieces in newspapers and online platforms can indicate public sentiment. High volumes of letters expressing discontent may signify widespread disagreement.

5. Town Halls and Public Forums: Participation in local events can showcase voter reactions in real-time, allowing for immediate feedback on appointments.

6. Media Coverage: The framing of appointments in news stories can reflect or influence public opinion. Analyzing the tone and focus of media coverage may help gauge overall sentiment.

Combining these sources can provide a comprehensive view of how American voters feel about presidential appointments.

Me? As I mentioned before, time will tell. Trump survived those assassination attempts for some reason. Let's allow Trump's teams to do their jobs for a while.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

The FBI will now work for Trump. It's just like the Supreme Court. Next year the FBI will go after Trump opponents. They should be careful.

Do you ever speak the truth dirtbag

 

[sealybobo]

Do you ever speak the truth dirtbag

You guys were so put off by Hunter but now you love Matt Gaetz. Weird.

 

[kyzr]

To gauge whether most American voters disagree with a president-elect's appointments, several methods can be employed:

1. Polling: Public opinion polls are a primary tool to assess voter sentiment. Organizations like Gallup, Pew Research, and others conduct surveys that reflect how Americans view specific appointments. Tracking changes in approval ratings over time can also provide insights.

2. Focus Groups: Engaging smaller, diverse groups of voters in discussions can reveal deeper insights into public sentiment regarding appointments. These qualitative methods can uncover nuanced opinions that polls may not capture.

3. Social Media Analysis: Monitoring social media platforms can offer real-time feedback on public reaction to appointments. Analyzing trends, comments, and hashtags can provide a sense of how voters are feeling.

4. Letters to Editors and Opinion Pieces: The content and tone of opinion pieces in newspapers and online platforms can indicate public sentiment. High volumes of letters expressing discontent may signify widespread disagreement.

5. Town Halls and Public Forums: Participation in local events can showcase voter reactions in real-time, allowing for immediate feedback on appointments.

6. Media Coverage: The framing of appointments in news stories can reflect or influence public opinion. Analyzing the tone and focus of media coverage may help gauge overall sentiment.

Combining these sources can provide a comprehensive view of how American voters feel about presidential appointments.

Me? As I mentioned before, time will tell. Trump survived those assassination attempts for some reason. Let's allow Trump's teams to do their jobs for a while.

1. Polling may not encompass the recent electorate's mandate.
2. Focus groups may not encompass the recent electorate's mandate.
3. Social media analysis may not encompass the recent electorate's mandate.
4. etc. for letters, town halls, and especially for the biased (left leaning) media's commentary.

What matters is that the president nominated the people he wants to run the government, unless the Senators have a major problem with them they should be approved. Don't ask me to describe "major" that would depend if its a Republican or a democrat senator.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

We should start gerrymandering states like PA

Which has what to do with the Senate?

 

[Luckyone]

Another lie. Trump typically donates $130,000,000 a year to charity. That is more than I would have given after the way the crooked DAs (elected by the "people") who vowed "to get Trump" misused "LAWFARE" to hurt Trump financially to the point of a $500,000,000 "fine" that the appeals court needs to reverse.

Vast Majority Of Trump’s Charitable Giving Reportedly Came From Land Deals

Trump reneged on several pledges to give to charity and sped up his giving after launching his 2016 campaign, a new report found.

www.forbes.com

Vast Majority Of Trump’s Charitable Giving Reportedly Came From Land Deals​

I'm sure the Versaille restaurant sent Trump the check dumbass.

To begin with and before I answer your question, I am going to give you this warning. I do not accept personal insults and debasing. Your dumbass statement is something I do not accept. You can say things like "you don't know what you are doing", you are blind-by-choice", "you are misinformed", and even "you are not using your brain", those are all fair responses. Dumbass is an insult and debasement. Next time, I will put you on ignore and you will be #33, with all the other insulters and debasers that seem to live here in this message board.

Having said that and addressing your response:

Back in April, Fahrenthold and Rosalind S. Helderman reported that they couldn’t find a single cash donation to charity that Trump personally had made over the previous five years. The Trump campaign had provided the newspaper with a list of donations made by the candidate, but many turned out to be gifts-in-kind from Trump’s businesses, such as free rounds of golf at Trump courses donated to charity auctions, and land-conservation agreements to forgo development rights on Trump-owned properties. The only cash donations were from the Donald J. Trump Foundation, the family charity that Trump established in 1988. But the Post also pointed out that Trump hadn’t given any of his own money to the Trump Foundation since 2008—

Trump is not a "giving" person. He does things that seem charitable but everything he has done has been with a personal goal in mind.

For example, most charitable people that truly give, do not publicly announce their donations or get anything back from them. Trump gets favors, gets advertising, seeks and gets praise, etc., which means he is not giving but investing.

Trump in his entire lifetime has never done one single thing that he did not get a benefit back from it.

That is not charity and it is not giving.

 

[lg325]

Sometimes Presidents will nominate someone for a position knowing their chances of being accepted is minimal.
The reason they do this is a way to thank an individual or thank a faction of his party. They always have a second list of real nominees ready. If his first list are chosen I hope they do well and clean out the fat and corruption and run a clean efficient and effective department.