Trump's New York conviction

Then file a lawsuit about it to challenge the rules BEFORE the election.

Instead you waited until after people had voted, then tried to figure out how to take away our rights to vote because you didn’t like who we fired for.
It was tried. The case was thrown out because no one had been damaged YET. After the election when damage had occurred, the case was again thrown out for not being "timely" in other words the election had already happened so nothing could be done. The judge created a "catch 22" so the election law changes couldn't be challenged.
 
It was tried. The case was thrown out because no one had been damaged YET. After the election when damage had occurred, the case was again thrown out for not being "timely" in other words the election had already happened so nothing could be done. The judge created a "catch 22" so the election law changes couldn't be challenged.
Simply untrue. They did file a handful of lawsuits, but did very little compared to their post-election litigation.

Lawsuits were not thrown out due to lack of injury. If you disagree, feel free to provide an example.
 
Simply untrue. They did file a handful of lawsuits, but did very little compared to their post-election litigation.

Lawsuits were not thrown out due to lack of injury. If you disagree, feel free to provide an example.
Everytime you say this when something is said that debunks your claim. You are so far on the wrong side of every issue it's become pathetic.
 
Everytime you say this when something is said that debunks your claim. You are so far on the wrong side of every issue it's become pathetic.
Go ahead and provide the case that debunks my claim.

I don’t think you will because you’re just not that smart. But who knows. Maybe I’m wrong about that.
 
Go ahead and provide the case that debunks my claim.

I don’t think you will because you’re just not that smart. But who knows. Maybe I’m wrong about that.
I debunked your claim with this thread .
 
I debunked your claim with this thread .
Gibberish. Until you post a case that backs up your claim; you’ve done nothing.

I told you that you weren’t smart enough for this.
 
Numbnuts YouTube is the vehicle that is reporting the legal process that is taking place. It's more valid than your democrat lying media that you used for the past 8 years.
YouTube channel by a nobody? :auiqs.jpg:

YouTube itself is NOT reporting anything.

Some guy has his own YT channel. You can't even get your story straight on the most basic facts of where your imbecilic info comes from.
 
YouTube channel by a nobody? :auiqs.jpg:

YouTube itself is NOT reporting anything.

Some guy has his own YT channel. You can't even get your story straight on the most basic facts of where your imbecilic info comes from.
Ill stick with real news from YouTube all you have is democrat propaganda that lies to you continually
 
Gibberish. Until you post a case that backs up your claim; you’ve done nothing.

I told you that you weren’t smart enough for this.
Says the queen of gibberish
Numbñuts I told you Trump's case were going to go bye bye. And here we are you whining like a little bitch.
 
Says the queen of gibberish
Numbñuts I told you Trump's case were going to go bye bye. And here we are you whining like a little bitch.
You’re confused about the topic.

But all you’re doing is bragging about how effectively Trump has been at destroying the criminal justice system.
 
You’re confused about the topic.

But all you’re doing is bragging about how effectively Trump has been at destroying the criminal justice system.
I started the thread I know what the topic is numbnuts
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom