TrumpO losing to Obama’s job Growth Record. TrumpO is a loser. Who is to blame.

[Cellblock2429]

/——/ However they lost their jobs, Obozo counted the part time jobs as new jobs created.

Are you saying that under Trump that's not true? Can you point to the BLS announcement of this change in methodology?

And go do realize that the number of multiple job holders and the percent of part time workers went down under Obama?

/—-/ It frustrating when you libtards pretend to be uninformed. Stop playing stupid. The information is just a google search away: Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract By Investing.com

From your link:

Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Anyone can say a new study from Harvard and Princeton but if you don’t actually post a link to the study, then how do you know it’s not complete bullshit?

/—-/ Here ya go Spanky: Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time

Except now Krueger and Katz say they were wrong. Economists walk back study showing huge increase in gig work - CNN

/—-/ That is talking about the elusive number of gig work. Uber was just starting out (2009?) when Obozo seized the office. (I say seized to irritate the left who said that about the GOP winning the House in the 90s) I’m talking about people who lost their full time careers and were forced to take 2 part time gigs just to have $$ coming in. Obozo counted those as 2 new jobs created. It was all BS.

 

[Maxdeath]

I always get a good laugh at how the left always lays the blame for the recession on GWBush and give 44 all the credit for ending it. Seems they tend to forget that the left felt that everyone should be able to own a house so they changed the requirements for loans of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. People bought houses with little down.

I always get a good laugh at how the Right always accuse Obama of doing what Bush did. It was BUSH who gave no downpayment loans to people with BAD credit for more than the property was worth.

Bush seeks to increase minority homeownership
By Thomas A. Fogarty, USA TODAY
In a bid to boost minority homeownership, President Bush will ask Congress for authority to eliminate the down-payment requirement for Federal Housing Administration loans.
In announcing the plan Monday at a home builders show in Las Vegas, Federal Housing Commissioner John Weicher called the proposal the "most significant FHA initiative in more than a decade." It would lead to 150,000 first-time owners annually, he said.
Nothing-down options are available on the private mortgage market, but, in general, they require the borrower to have pristine credit. Bush's proposed change would extend the nothing-down option to borrowers with blemished credit.

I am going to point you to only one of many such.
Democrats Were Wrong On Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac

 

[edthecynic]

ACA forced many employers to hire part time and do away with full time workers because they could not stay in business paying for healthcare. So part time meant more jobs.

If Obama's job numbers were actually bad you wouldn't have to lie about them!!!!!
The fact that you do lie about them proves you know they were better than Tramp's.
Thank you.
BTW, as you well know, After the PPACA was passed the number of workers working PT who wanted FT went DOWN.

Way to point out something. By saying my opinion is right and you are wrong. Good job.

Are you drunk again?

At least I can back what I said with an economist, it is just not my opinion.
Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Economic Productivity

But I doubt you will bother with facts.

First of all that is an OPINION piece from the extremist Hillsdale FAKE College and gave no "FACTS" to back its claim. It simply fabricated a FAKE tax on FT employment and then opined from there.
From your link: "the penalty on employers and the subsidies in the exchanges add up to a tax on full-time employment—a tax that you pay if you work full time but not if you work part time or don’t work at all. And the problem with that, of course, is that by taxing full-time work—which is the same as subsidizing part-time work and unemployment—you get less of the former and more of the latter two."

Later he admits the tax he fabricated does not actually exist in the law, "In all of the economic analyses of the ACA, there was no mention of this full-time employment tax—despite the fact that it’s the single biggest tax in the law."

If you actually want "FACTS" you need to go to the BLS data on PT workers who want FT work, and you will see that after the PPACA became law in March 2010 the number went DOWN from 9,126,000 to 5,696,000 when Obama left and has continued DOWN under the PPACA to 3,878,000 now!!!!!
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

Download:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 7911 8697 9041 8821 8964 8900 8742 8904 8718 8821 9018 8996
2010 8423 8786 9126 9093 8697 8439 8361 8676 9111 8688 8730 8794
2011 8339 8372 8473 8528 8427 8289 8131 8632 9012 8526 8335 8030
2012 8174 8104 7680 7793 7983 7946 7972 7842 8528 8079 8066 7844
2013 8069 8061 7632 7837 7812 7988 7961 7677 7656 7844 7627 7711
2014 7180 7178 7343 7376 7177 7319 7288 7102 6905 6943 6777 6760
2015 6704 6571 6551 6522 6505 6252 6138 6315 5951 5778 6061 5972
2016 5810 5875 5971 5921 6390 5647 5826 5868 5819 5900 5628 5501
2017 5696 5525 5406 5207 5165 5211 5220 5159 5086 4858 4773 4953
2018 4929 5020 4867 4844 4835 4657 4510 4311 4575 4549 4726 4580
2019 5079 4244 4439 4589 4241 4258 3878

 

[edthecynic]

I always get a good laugh at how the left always lays the blame for the recession on GWBush and give 44 all the credit for ending it. Seems they tend to forget that the left felt that everyone should be able to own a house so they changed the requirements for loans of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. People bought houses with little down.

I always get a good laugh at how the Right always accuse Obama of doing what Bush did. It was BUSH who gave no downpayment loans to people with BAD credit for more than the property was worth.

Bush seeks to increase minority homeownership
By Thomas A. Fogarty, USA TODAY
In a bid to boost minority homeownership, President Bush will ask Congress for authority to eliminate the down-payment requirement for Federal Housing Administration loans.
In announcing the plan Monday at a home builders show in Las Vegas, Federal Housing Commissioner John Weicher called the proposal the "most significant FHA initiative in more than a decade." It would lead to 150,000 first-time owners annually, he said.
Nothing-down options are available on the private mortgage market, but, in general, they require the borrower to have pristine credit. Bush's proposed change would extend the nothing-down option to borrowers with blemished credit.

I am going to point you to only one of many such.
Democrats Were Wrong On Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac

All of which are FAKE NEWS!
The GOP blocked ALL reform bills while whining that reform was needed, so typical of the GOP.

The fact remains it was BUSH who allowed no downpayment loans to borrowers with BAD credit, not Carter, not Clinton, and not Obama!!!!

 

[Maxdeath]

ACA forced many employers to hire part time and do away with full time workers because they could not stay in business paying for healthcare. So part time meant more jobs.

If Obama's job numbers were actually bad you wouldn't have to lie about them!!!!!
The fact that you do lie about them proves you know they were better than Tramp's.
Thank you.
BTW, as you well know, After the PPACA was passed the number of workers working PT who wanted FT went DOWN.

Way to point out something. By saying my opinion is right and you are wrong. Good job.

Are you drunk again?

At least I can back what I said with an economist, it is just not my opinion.
Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Economic Productivity

But I doubt you will bother with facts.

First of all that is an OPINION piece from the extremist Hillsdale FAKE College and gave no "FACTS" to back its claim. It simply fabricated a FAKE tax on FT employment and then opined from there.
From your link: "the penalty on employers and the subsidies in the exchanges add up to a tax on full-time employment—a tax that you pay if you work full time but not if you work part time or don’t work at all. And the problem with that, of course, is that by taxing full-time work—which is the same as subsidizing part-time work and unemployment—you get less of the former and more of the latter two."

Later he admits the tax he fabricated does not actually exist in the law, "In all of the economic analyses of the ACA, there was no mention of this full-time employment tax—despite the fact that it’s the single biggest tax in the law."

If you actually want "FACTS" you need to go to the BLS data on PT workers who want FT work, and you will see that after the PPACA became law in March 2010 the number went DOWN from 9,126,000 to 5,696,000 when Obama left and has continued DOWN under the PPACA to 3,878,000 now!!!!!
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

Download:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 7911 8697 9041 8821 8964 8900 8742 8904 8718 8821 9018 8996
2010 8423 8786 9126 9093 8697 8439 8361 8676 9111 8688 8730 8794
2011 8339 8372 8473 8528 8427 8289 8131 8632 9012 8526 8335 8030
2012 8174 8104 7680 7793 7983 7946 7972 7842 8528 8079 8066 7844
2013 8069 8061 7632 7837 7812 7988 7961 7677 7656 7844 7627 7711
2014 7180 7178 7343 7376 7177 7319 7288 7102 6905 6943 6777 6760
2015 6704 6571 6551 6522 6505 6252 6138 6315 5951 5778 6061 5972
2016 5810 5875 5971 5921 6390 5647 5826 5868 5819 5900 5628 5501
2017 5696 5525 5406 5207 5165 5211 5220 5159 5086 4858 4773 4953
2018 4929 5020 4867 4844 4835 4657 4510 4311 4575 4549 4726 4580
2019 5079 4244 4439 4589 4241 4258 3878

First off the link you post sys right in the link invalid. When you go to it it gives an invalid.
Did not like an economist telling the tale. I notice you always try and cherry pick. Try this one on.Businesses eliminated hundreds of thousands of full-time jobs to avoid Obamacare mandate

 

[Maxdeath]

I always get a good laugh at how the left always lays the blame for the recession on GWBush and give 44 all the credit for ending it. Seems they tend to forget that the left felt that everyone should be able to own a house so they changed the requirements for loans of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. People bought houses with little down.

I always get a good laugh at how the Right always accuse Obama of doing what Bush did. It was BUSH who gave no downpayment loans to people with BAD credit for more than the property was worth.

Bush seeks to increase minority homeownership
By Thomas A. Fogarty, USA TODAY
In a bid to boost minority homeownership, President Bush will ask Congress for authority to eliminate the down-payment requirement for Federal Housing Administration loans.
In announcing the plan Monday at a home builders show in Las Vegas, Federal Housing Commissioner John Weicher called the proposal the "most significant FHA initiative in more than a decade." It would lead to 150,000 first-time owners annually, he said.
Nothing-down options are available on the private mortgage market, but, in general, they require the borrower to have pristine credit. Bush's proposed change would extend the nothing-down option to borrowers with blemished credit.

I am going to point you to only one of many such.
Democrats Were Wrong On Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac

All of which are FAKE NEWS!
The GOP blocked ALL reform bills while whining that reform was needed, so typical of the GOP.

The fact remains it was BUSH who allowed no downpayment loans to borrowers with BAD credit, not Carter, not Clinton, and not Obama!!!!

I always love the way the crazy left debates. Fake news if they don't like it. If someone on the right claims fake news the left always sticks up for news sources no matter how far left they maybe, or even if they are opinion pieces and labeled as such.

 

[edthecynic]

If Obama's job numbers were actually bad you wouldn't have to lie about them!!!!!
The fact that you do lie about them proves you know they were better than Tramp's.
Thank you.
BTW, as you well know, After the PPACA was passed the number of workers working PT who wanted FT went DOWN.

Way to point out something. By saying my opinion is right and you are wrong. Good job.

Are you drunk again?

At least I can back what I said with an economist, it is just not my opinion.
Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Economic Productivity

But I doubt you will bother with facts.

First of all that is an OPINION piece from the extremist Hillsdale FAKE College and gave no "FACTS" to back its claim. It simply fabricated a FAKE tax on FT employment and then opined from there.
From your link: "the penalty on employers and the subsidies in the exchanges add up to a tax on full-time employment—a tax that you pay if you work full time but not if you work part time or don’t work at all. And the problem with that, of course, is that by taxing full-time work—which is the same as subsidizing part-time work and unemployment—you get less of the former and more of the latter two."

Later he admits the tax he fabricated does not actually exist in the law, "In all of the economic analyses of the ACA, there was no mention of this full-time employment tax—despite the fact that it’s the single biggest tax in the law."

If you actually want "FACTS" you need to go to the BLS data on PT workers who want FT work, and you will see that after the PPACA became law in March 2010 the number went DOWN from 9,126,000 to 5,696,000 when Obama left and has continued DOWN under the PPACA to 3,878,000 now!!!!!
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

Download:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 7911 8697 9041 8821 8964 8900 8742 8904 8718 8821 9018 8996
2010 8423 8786 9126 9093 8697 8439 8361 8676 9111 8688 8730 8794
2011 8339 8372 8473 8528 8427 8289 8131 8632 9012 8526 8335 8030
2012 8174 8104 7680 7793 7983 7946 7972 7842 8528 8079 8066 7844
2013 8069 8061 7632 7837 7812 7988 7961 7677 7656 7844 7627 7711
2014 7180 7178 7343 7376 7177 7319 7288 7102 6905 6943 6777 6760
2015 6704 6571 6551 6522 6505 6252 6138 6315 5951 5778 6061 5972
2016 5810 5875 5971 5921 6390 5647 5826 5868 5819 5900 5628 5501
2017 5696 5525 5406 5207 5165 5211 5220 5159 5086 4858 4773 4953
2018 4929 5020 4867 4844 4835 4657 4510 4311 4575 4549 4726 4580
2019 5079 4244 4439 4589 4241 4258 3878

First off the link you post sys right in the link invalid. When you go to it it gives an invalid.
Did not like an economist telling the tale. I notice you always try and cherry pick. Try this one on.Businesses eliminated hundreds of thousands of full-time jobs to avoid Obamacare mandate

I don't know why the link doesn't work when I C&P it.
Use this link Table A-8. Employed persons by class of worker and part-time status and near the bottom click on the box labeled "Part time for economic reasons(4)" seasonally adjusted, and then go down to the tab at the bottom "retrieve data" and click, it will take you to the page I linked to.

 

[edthecynic]

I always get a good laugh at how the left always lays the blame for the recession on GWBush and give 44 all the credit for ending it. Seems they tend to forget that the left felt that everyone should be able to own a house so they changed the requirements for loans of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. People bought houses with little down.

I always get a good laugh at how the Right always accuse Obama of doing what Bush did. It was BUSH who gave no downpayment loans to people with BAD credit for more than the property was worth.

Bush seeks to increase minority homeownership
By Thomas A. Fogarty, USA TODAY
In a bid to boost minority homeownership, President Bush will ask Congress for authority to eliminate the down-payment requirement for Federal Housing Administration loans.
In announcing the plan Monday at a home builders show in Las Vegas, Federal Housing Commissioner John Weicher called the proposal the "most significant FHA initiative in more than a decade." It would lead to 150,000 first-time owners annually, he said.
Nothing-down options are available on the private mortgage market, but, in general, they require the borrower to have pristine credit. Bush's proposed change would extend the nothing-down option to borrowers with blemished credit.

I am going to point you to only one of many such.
Democrats Were Wrong On Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac

All of which are FAKE NEWS!
The GOP blocked ALL reform bills while whining that reform was needed, so typical of the GOP.

The fact remains it was BUSH who allowed no downpayment loans to borrowers with BAD credit, not Carter, not Clinton, and not Obama!!!!

I always love the way the crazy left debates. Fake news if they don't like it. If someone on the right claims fake news the left always sticks up for news sources no matter how far left they maybe, or even if they are opinion pieces and labeled as such.

It IS fake news, and nobody knows it better than you! Name one reform bill that the GOP did not block!!!!!

 

[Maxdeath]

Way to point out something. By saying my opinion is right and you are wrong. Good job.

Are you drunk again?

At least I can back what I said with an economist, it is just not my opinion.
Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Economic Productivity

But I doubt you will bother with facts.

First of all that is an OPINION piece from the extremist Hillsdale FAKE College and gave no "FACTS" to back its claim. It simply fabricated a FAKE tax on FT employment and then opined from there.
From your link: "the penalty on employers and the subsidies in the exchanges add up to a tax on full-time employment—a tax that you pay if you work full time but not if you work part time or don’t work at all. And the problem with that, of course, is that by taxing full-time work—which is the same as subsidizing part-time work and unemployment—you get less of the former and more of the latter two."

Later he admits the tax he fabricated does not actually exist in the law, "In all of the economic analyses of the ACA, there was no mention of this full-time employment tax—despite the fact that it’s the single biggest tax in the law."

If you actually want "FACTS" you need to go to the BLS data on PT workers who want FT work, and you will see that after the PPACA became law in March 2010 the number went DOWN from 9,126,000 to 5,696,000 when Obama left and has continued DOWN under the PPACA to 3,878,000 now!!!!!
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

Download:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 7911 8697 9041 8821 8964 8900 8742 8904 8718 8821 9018 8996
2010 8423 8786 9126 9093 8697 8439 8361 8676 9111 8688 8730 8794
2011 8339 8372 8473 8528 8427 8289 8131 8632 9012 8526 8335 8030
2012 8174 8104 7680 7793 7983 7946 7972 7842 8528 8079 8066 7844
2013 8069 8061 7632 7837 7812 7988 7961 7677 7656 7844 7627 7711
2014 7180 7178 7343 7376 7177 7319 7288 7102 6905 6943 6777 6760
2015 6704 6571 6551 6522 6505 6252 6138 6315 5951 5778 6061 5972
2016 5810 5875 5971 5921 6390 5647 5826 5868 5819 5900 5628 5501
2017 5696 5525 5406 5207 5165 5211 5220 5159 5086 4858 4773 4953
2018 4929 5020 4867 4844 4835 4657 4510 4311 4575 4549 4726 4580
2019 5079 4244 4439 4589 4241 4258 3878

First off the link you post sys right in the link invalid. When you go to it it gives an invalid.
Did not like an economist telling the tale. I notice you always try and cherry pick. Try this one on.Businesses eliminated hundreds of thousands of full-time jobs to avoid Obamacare mandate

I don't know why the link doesn't work when I C&P it.
Use this link Table A-8. Employed persons by class of worker and part-time status and near the bottom click on the box labeled "Part time for economic reasons(4)" seasonally adjusted, and then go down to the tab at the bottom "retrieve data" and click, it will take you to the page I linked to.

Well that was so funny normative. There was a number of lists, no data, when I click on retrieve data it gives the same error message. But hey good for you. In case you did not notice the numbers do not show anything of real value.

 

[Maxdeath]

I always get a good laugh at how the left always lays the blame for the recession on GWBush and give 44 all the credit for ending it. Seems they tend to forget that the left felt that everyone should be able to own a house so they changed the requirements for loans of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. People bought houses with little down.

I always get a good laugh at how the Right always accuse Obama of doing what Bush did. It was BUSH who gave no downpayment loans to people with BAD credit for more than the property was worth.

Bush seeks to increase minority homeownership
By Thomas A. Fogarty, USA TODAY
In a bid to boost minority homeownership, President Bush will ask Congress for authority to eliminate the down-payment requirement for Federal Housing Administration loans.
In announcing the plan Monday at a home builders show in Las Vegas, Federal Housing Commissioner John Weicher called the proposal the "most significant FHA initiative in more than a decade." It would lead to 150,000 first-time owners annually, he said.
Nothing-down options are available on the private mortgage market, but, in general, they require the borrower to have pristine credit. Bush's proposed change would extend the nothing-down option to borrowers with blemished credit.

I am going to point you to only one of many such.
Democrats Were Wrong On Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac

All of which are FAKE NEWS!
The GOP blocked ALL reform bills while whining that reform was needed, so typical of the GOP.

The fact remains it was BUSH who allowed no downpayment loans to borrowers with BAD credit, not Carter, not Clinton, and not Obama!!!!

I always love the way the crazy left debates. Fake news if they don't like it. If someone on the right claims fake news the left always sticks up for news sources no matter how far left they maybe, or even if they are opinion pieces and labeled as such.

It IS fake news, and nobody knows it better than you! Name one reform bill that the GOP did not block!!!!!

I love it. Lol. I want you to prove that the news that I say is fake is fake. Can't get any crazier then that.
Now why would you claim that an opinion piece is not fake but news from a then respected news source is fake? Oh I know it does not fit your view.

 

[pinqy]

Are you saying that under Trump that's not true? Can you point to the BLS announcement of this change in methodology?

And go do realize that the number of multiple job holders and the percent of part time workers went down under Obama?

/—-/ It frustrating when you libtards pretend to be uninformed. Stop playing stupid. The information is just a google search away: Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract By Investing.com

From your link:

Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

Anyone can say a new study from Harvard and Princeton but if you don’t actually post a link to the study, then how do you know it’s not complete bullshit?

/—-/ Here ya go Spanky: Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time

Except now Krueger and Katz say they were wrong. Economists walk back study showing huge increase in gig work - CNN

/—-/ That is talking about the elusive number of gig work. Uber was just starting out (2009?) when Obozo seized the office. (I say seized to irritate the left who said that about the GOP winning the House in the 90s) I’m talking about people who lost their full time careers and were forced to take 2 part time gigs just to have $$ coming in. Obozo counted those as 2 new jobs created. It was all BS.

And that’s all the initial study was about: gig jobs. It said zero about the majority of new jobs being parttime or temp. And now they’re saying based in new data, their estimates for 1995-2015 were wrong.

 

[edthecynic]

Are you drunk again?

At least I can back what I said with an economist, it is just not my opinion.
Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Economic Productivity

But I doubt you will bother with facts.

First of all that is an OPINION piece from the extremist Hillsdale FAKE College and gave no "FACTS" to back its claim. It simply fabricated a FAKE tax on FT employment and then opined from there.
From your link: "the penalty on employers and the subsidies in the exchanges add up to a tax on full-time employment—a tax that you pay if you work full time but not if you work part time or don’t work at all. And the problem with that, of course, is that by taxing full-time work—which is the same as subsidizing part-time work and unemployment—you get less of the former and more of the latter two."

Later he admits the tax he fabricated does not actually exist in the law, "In all of the economic analyses of the ACA, there was no mention of this full-time employment tax—despite the fact that it’s the single biggest tax in the law."

If you actually want "FACTS" you need to go to the BLS data on PT workers who want FT work, and you will see that after the PPACA became law in March 2010 the number went DOWN from 9,126,000 to 5,696,000 when Obama left and has continued DOWN under the PPACA to 3,878,000 now!!!!!
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

Download:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 7911 8697 9041 8821 8964 8900 8742 8904 8718 8821 9018 8996
2010 8423 8786 9126 9093 8697 8439 8361 8676 9111 8688 8730 8794
2011 8339 8372 8473 8528 8427 8289 8131 8632 9012 8526 8335 8030
2012 8174 8104 7680 7793 7983 7946 7972 7842 8528 8079 8066 7844
2013 8069 8061 7632 7837 7812 7988 7961 7677 7656 7844 7627 7711
2014 7180 7178 7343 7376 7177 7319 7288 7102 6905 6943 6777 6760
2015 6704 6571 6551 6522 6505 6252 6138 6315 5951 5778 6061 5972
2016 5810 5875 5971 5921 6390 5647 5826 5868 5819 5900 5628 5501
2017 5696 5525 5406 5207 5165 5211 5220 5159 5086 4858 4773 4953
2018 4929 5020 4867 4844 4835 4657 4510 4311 4575 4549 4726 4580
2019 5079 4244 4439 4589 4241 4258 3878

First off the link you post sys right in the link invalid. When you go to it it gives an invalid.
Did not like an economist telling the tale. I notice you always try and cherry pick. Try this one on.Businesses eliminated hundreds of thousands of full-time jobs to avoid Obamacare mandate

I don't know why the link doesn't work when I C&P it.
Use this link Table A-8. Employed persons by class of worker and part-time status and near the bottom click on the box labeled "Part time for economic reasons(4)" seasonally adjusted, and then go down to the tab at the bottom "retrieve data" and click, it will take you to the page I linked to.

Well that was so funny normative. There was a number of lists, no data, when I click on retrieve data it gives the same error message. But hey good for you. In case you did not notice the numbers do not show anything of real value.

Dumbass, you have to click on the data you want to retrieve first!!!!!
As I have shown so many times before on this board, when the Right know they were caught lying they PLAY DUMB so they can keep on lying.

 

[edthecynic]

I always get a good laugh at how the Right always accuse Obama of doing what Bush did. It was BUSH who gave no downpayment loans to people with BAD credit for more than the property was worth.

Bush seeks to increase minority homeownership
By Thomas A. Fogarty, USA TODAY
In a bid to boost minority homeownership, President Bush will ask Congress for authority to eliminate the down-payment requirement for Federal Housing Administration loans.
In announcing the plan Monday at a home builders show in Las Vegas, Federal Housing Commissioner John Weicher called the proposal the "most significant FHA initiative in more than a decade." It would lead to 150,000 first-time owners annually, he said.
Nothing-down options are available on the private mortgage market, but, in general, they require the borrower to have pristine credit. Bush's proposed change would extend the nothing-down option to borrowers with blemished credit.

I am going to point you to only one of many such.
Democrats Were Wrong On Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac

All of which are FAKE NEWS!
The GOP blocked ALL reform bills while whining that reform was needed, so typical of the GOP.

The fact remains it was BUSH who allowed no downpayment loans to borrowers with BAD credit, not Carter, not Clinton, and not Obama!!!!

I always love the way the crazy left debates. Fake news if they don't like it. If someone on the right claims fake news the left always sticks up for news sources no matter how far left they maybe, or even if they are opinion pieces and labeled as such.

It IS fake news, and nobody knows it better than you! Name one reform bill that the GOP did not block!!!!!

I love it. Lol. I want you to prove that the news that I say is fake is fake. Can't get any crazier then that.
Now why would you claim that an opinion piece is not fake but news from a then respected news source is fake? Oh I know it does not fit your view.

Neither the Gateway Pundit or National Review Online are respected news sources, if they were you wouldn't use them.

And again, the GOP only talked about reform while BLOCKING every reform bill that was proposed, which is why you can't show even one reform bill ever brought to the GOP controlled Senate floor for a vote!!!!!!

 

[Maxdeath]

At least I can back what I said with an economist, it is just not my opinion.
Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Economic Productivity

But I doubt you will bother with facts.

First of all that is an OPINION piece from the extremist Hillsdale FAKE College and gave no "FACTS" to back its claim. It simply fabricated a FAKE tax on FT employment and then opined from there.
From your link: "the penalty on employers and the subsidies in the exchanges add up to a tax on full-time employment—a tax that you pay if you work full time but not if you work part time or don’t work at all. And the problem with that, of course, is that by taxing full-time work—which is the same as subsidizing part-time work and unemployment—you get less of the former and more of the latter two."

Later he admits the tax he fabricated does not actually exist in the law, "In all of the economic analyses of the ACA, there was no mention of this full-time employment tax—despite the fact that it’s the single biggest tax in the law."

If you actually want "FACTS" you need to go to the BLS data on PT workers who want FT work, and you will see that after the PPACA became law in March 2010 the number went DOWN from 9,126,000 to 5,696,000 when Obama left and has continued DOWN under the PPACA to 3,878,000 now!!!!!
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

Download:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 7911 8697 9041 8821 8964 8900 8742 8904 8718 8821 9018 8996
2010 8423 8786 9126 9093 8697 8439 8361 8676 9111 8688 8730 8794
2011 8339 8372 8473 8528 8427 8289 8131 8632 9012 8526 8335 8030
2012 8174 8104 7680 7793 7983 7946 7972 7842 8528 8079 8066 7844
2013 8069 8061 7632 7837 7812 7988 7961 7677 7656 7844 7627 7711
2014 7180 7178 7343 7376 7177 7319 7288 7102 6905 6943 6777 6760
2015 6704 6571 6551 6522 6505 6252 6138 6315 5951 5778 6061 5972
2016 5810 5875 5971 5921 6390 5647 5826 5868 5819 5900 5628 5501
2017 5696 5525 5406 5207 5165 5211 5220 5159 5086 4858 4773 4953
2018 4929 5020 4867 4844 4835 4657 4510 4311 4575 4549 4726 4580
2019 5079 4244 4439 4589 4241 4258 3878

First off the link you post sys right in the link invalid. When you go to it it gives an invalid.
Did not like an economist telling the tale. I notice you always try and cherry pick. Try this one on.Businesses eliminated hundreds of thousands of full-time jobs to avoid Obamacare mandate

I don't know why the link doesn't work when I C&P it.
Use this link Table A-8. Employed persons by class of worker and part-time status and near the bottom click on the box labeled "Part time for economic reasons(4)" seasonally adjusted, and then go down to the tab at the bottom "retrieve data" and click, it will take you to the page I linked to.

Well that was so funny normative. There was a number of lists, no data, when I click on retrieve data it gives the same error message. But hey good for you. In case you did not notice the numbers do not show anything of real value.

Dumbass, you have to click on the data you want to retrieve first!!!!!
As I have shown so many times before on this board, when the Right know they were caught lying they PLAY DUMB so they can keep on lying.

Good for you now you are calling names. Good shows the usual quality of the left. So I need to bring up numbers that really do little to prove your case. I could possibly find hundreds of numbers but they would do little to prove or disprove a case without understanding how they are related to what is being asserted. But hey no one claimed the left understands llogic or economics.

 

[Maxdeath]

I am going to point you to only one of many such.
Democrats Were Wrong On Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac

All of which are FAKE NEWS!
The GOP blocked ALL reform bills while whining that reform was needed, so typical of the GOP.

The fact remains it was BUSH who allowed no downpayment loans to borrowers with BAD credit, not Carter, not Clinton, and not Obama!!!!

I always love the way the crazy left debates. Fake news if they don't like it. If someone on the right claims fake news the left always sticks up for news sources no matter how far left they maybe, or even if they are opinion pieces and labeled as such.

It IS fake news, and nobody knows it better than you! Name one reform bill that the GOP did not block!!!!!

I love it. Lol. I want you to prove that the news that I say is fake is fake. Can't get any crazier then that.
Now why would you claim that an opinion piece is not fake but news from a then respected news source is fake? Oh I know it does not fit your view.

Neither the Gateway Pundit or National Review Online are respected news sources, if they were you wouldn't use them.

And again, the GOP only talked about reform while BLOCKING every reform bill that was proposed, which is why you can't show even one reform bill ever brought to the GOP controlled Senate floor for a vote!!!!!!

Rolf. I posted a piece from cbs news. You suddenly are going off about gateway pundit and national review? Are you trying to use them as sources and blaming me? Have no idea where you came up with them as I have never even read one word of either of them and automatically dismiss any thing from so called sites that are not major news services. Though I must admit to feeling the same way about the media arm of the left, CNN. I have on occasion used CNN as a news source just to show that even the media arm thinks something is bad.

 

[Maxdeath]

I am going to point you to only one of many such.
Democrats Were Wrong On Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac

All of which are FAKE NEWS!
The GOP blocked ALL reform bills while whining that reform was needed, so typical of the GOP.

The fact remains it was BUSH who allowed no downpayment loans to borrowers with BAD credit, not Carter, not Clinton, and not Obama!!!!

I always love the way the crazy left debates. Fake news if they don't like it. If someone on the right claims fake news the left always sticks up for news sources no matter how far left they maybe, or even if they are opinion pieces and labeled as such.

It IS fake news, and nobody knows it better than you! Name one reform bill that the GOP did not block!!!!!

I love it. Lol. I want you to prove that the news that I say is fake is fake. Can't get any crazier then that.
Now why would you claim that an opinion piece is not fake but news from a then respected news source is fake? Oh I know it does not fit your view.

Neither the Gateway Pundit or National Review Online are respected news sources, if they were you wouldn't use them.

And again, the GOP only talked about reform while BLOCKING every reform bill that was proposed, which is why you can't show even one reform bill ever brought to the GOP controlled Senate floor for a vote!!!!!!

Just for fun I will play your crazy little game by posting just this one article. No you can not use gateway or national so no it is fake news. GOP-led Senate passing bills at rate not seen in decades.

 

[edthecynic]

All of which are FAKE NEWS!
The GOP blocked ALL reform bills while whining that reform was needed, so typical of the GOP.

The fact remains it was BUSH who allowed no downpayment loans to borrowers with BAD credit, not Carter, not Clinton, and not Obama!!!!

I always love the way the crazy left debates. Fake news if they don't like it. If someone on the right claims fake news the left always sticks up for news sources no matter how far left they maybe, or even if they are opinion pieces and labeled as such.

It IS fake news, and nobody knows it better than you! Name one reform bill that the GOP did not block!!!!!

I love it. Lol. I want you to prove that the news that I say is fake is fake. Can't get any crazier then that.
Now why would you claim that an opinion piece is not fake but news from a then respected news source is fake? Oh I know it does not fit your view.

Neither the Gateway Pundit or National Review Online are respected news sources, if they were you wouldn't use them.

And again, the GOP only talked about reform while BLOCKING every reform bill that was proposed, which is why you can't show even one reform bill ever brought to the GOP controlled Senate floor for a vote!!!!!!

Rolf. I posted a piece from cbs news. You suddenly are going off about gateway pundit and national review? Are you trying to use them as sources and blaming me? Have no idea where you came up with them as I have never even read one word of either of them and automatically dismiss any thing from so called sites that are not major news services. Though I must admit to feeling the same way about the media arm of the left, CNN. I have on occasion used CNN as a news source just to show that even the media arm thinks something is bad.

You posted a piece from CBS that cited the Gateway Pundit, a completely worthless conspiracy nut site, and National Review Online another extremist Right-wing "source." CBS gives both sides straight from their wing-nut sources.
From your link: "(hat tip Gateway Pundit)"

Again you can't counter the fact that while the GOP flapped their gums about reform, the GOP blocked every reform bill.

 

[Third Party]

ACA forced many employers to hire part time and do away with full time workers because they could not stay in business paying for healthcare. So part time meant more jobs.

If Obama's job numbers were actually bad you wouldn't have to lie about them!!!!!
The fact that you do lie about them proves you know they were better than Tramp's.
Thank you.
BTW, as you well know, After the PPACA was passed the number of workers working PT who wanted FT went DOWN.

BS-where are your supporting numbers or witnesses?

Same place as Max's, funny how you didn't demand any supporting numbers from him!

Who is Max?

 

[edthecynic]

All of which are FAKE NEWS!
The GOP blocked ALL reform bills while whining that reform was needed, so typical of the GOP.

The fact remains it was BUSH who allowed no downpayment loans to borrowers with BAD credit, not Carter, not Clinton, and not Obama!!!!

I always love the way the crazy left debates. Fake news if they don't like it. If someone on the right claims fake news the left always sticks up for news sources no matter how far left they maybe, or even if they are opinion pieces and labeled as such.

It IS fake news, and nobody knows it better than you! Name one reform bill that the GOP did not block!!!!!

I love it. Lol. I want you to prove that the news that I say is fake is fake. Can't get any crazier then that.
Now why would you claim that an opinion piece is not fake but news from a then respected news source is fake? Oh I know it does not fit your view.

Neither the Gateway Pundit or National Review Online are respected news sources, if they were you wouldn't use them.

And again, the GOP only talked about reform while BLOCKING every reform bill that was proposed, which is why you can't show even one reform bill ever brought to the GOP controlled Senate floor for a vote!!!!!!

Just for fun I will play your crazy little game by posting just this one article. No you can not use gateway or national so no it is fake news. GOP-led Senate passing bills at rate not seen in decades.

Not one of them was a reform bill Bush was harping about, but you knew that already. BTW Bush was NOT president in 2016!

 

[edthecynic]

First of all that is an OPINION piece from the extremist Hillsdale FAKE College and gave no "FACTS" to back its claim. It simply fabricated a FAKE tax on FT employment and then opined from there.
From your link: "the penalty on employers and the subsidies in the exchanges add up to a tax on full-time employment—a tax that you pay if you work full time but not if you work part time or don’t work at all. And the problem with that, of course, is that by taxing full-time work—which is the same as subsidizing part-time work and unemployment—you get less of the former and more of the latter two."

Later he admits the tax he fabricated does not actually exist in the law, "In all of the economic analyses of the ACA, there was no mention of this full-time employment tax—despite the fact that it’s the single biggest tax in the law."

If you actually want "FACTS" you need to go to the BLS data on PT workers who want FT work, and you will see that after the PPACA became law in March 2010 the number went DOWN from 9,126,000 to 5,696,000 when Obama left and has continued DOWN under the PPACA to 3,878,000 now!!!!!
Notice: Data not available: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

Download:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 7911 8697 9041 8821 8964 8900 8742 8904 8718 8821 9018 8996
2010 8423 8786 9126 9093 8697 8439 8361 8676 9111 8688 8730 8794
2011 8339 8372 8473 8528 8427 8289 8131 8632 9012 8526 8335 8030
2012 8174 8104 7680 7793 7983 7946 7972 7842 8528 8079 8066 7844
2013 8069 8061 7632 7837 7812 7988 7961 7677 7656 7844 7627 7711
2014 7180 7178 7343 7376 7177 7319 7288 7102 6905 6943 6777 6760
2015 6704 6571 6551 6522 6505 6252 6138 6315 5951 5778 6061 5972
2016 5810 5875 5971 5921 6390 5647 5826 5868 5819 5900 5628 5501
2017 5696 5525 5406 5207 5165 5211 5220 5159 5086 4858 4773 4953
2018 4929 5020 4867 4844 4835 4657 4510 4311 4575 4549 4726 4580
2019 5079 4244 4439 4589 4241 4258 3878

First off the link you post sys right in the link invalid. When you go to it it gives an invalid.
Did not like an economist telling the tale. I notice you always try and cherry pick. Try this one on.Businesses eliminated hundreds of thousands of full-time jobs to avoid Obamacare mandate

I don't know why the link doesn't work when I C&P it.
Use this link Table A-8. Employed persons by class of worker and part-time status and near the bottom click on the box labeled "Part time for economic reasons(4)" seasonally adjusted, and then go down to the tab at the bottom "retrieve data" and click, it will take you to the page I linked to.

Well that was so funny normative. There was a number of lists, no data, when I click on retrieve data it gives the same error message. But hey good for you. In case you did not notice the numbers do not show anything of real value.

Dumbass, you have to click on the data you want to retrieve first!!!!!
As I have shown so many times before on this board, when the Right know they were caught lying they PLAY DUMB so they can keep on lying.

Good for you now you are calling names. Good shows the usual quality of the left. So I need to bring up numbers that really do little to prove your case. I could possibly find hundreds of numbers but they would do little to prove or disprove a case without understanding how they are related to what is being asserted. But hey no one claimed the left understands llogic or economics.

Again the perpetual dumb act!
What was asserted by the lying scum Right was that the PPACA forced employers to move FT workers to PT work, and the BLS numbers show that is a bold-faced LIE!
After the PPACA became law in March 2010 the number of PT workers who want FT work went DOWN from 9,126,000 upon passage to 5,696,000 when Obama left and has continued DOWN under the still in effect PPACA to 3,878,000 now!!!!!