Trump says Jack Smith is a criminal. My prediction for when Smith will go to jail

[Conservative from Georgia]

I’ve developed the Hillary Formula… a proven predictive model for political jail time.

Step 1: Take the date Trump said Hillary should be in jail. That was October 9, 2016.

Step 2: Add the exact amount of time it took her to actually go to jail.

We’re now past nine years and counting, and she’s still out signing books and giving speeches.

According to the formula, Jack Smith will go to jail at roughly the same cosmic hour Hillary does … somewhere between never and the end of the heat death of the universe.

According to the formula, Jack Smith will go to jail at roughly the same cosmic hour Hillary does … somewhere between never and the end of the heat death of the universe.

Trump's 'you'd be in jail' debate jab at Clinton condemned

The Republican presidential nominee made the threat _ an unprecedented break with U.S. political decorum _ in the middle of the second presidential debate, held Sunday in St.

apnews.com

Trump calls Jack Smith a 'criminal' who should be in prison in latest attack on his perceived foes

Former special counsel Jack Smith oversaw the two federal criminal indictments against Trump when he was a presidential candidate.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[OODA_Loop]

Punish him with the process then.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Punish him with the process then.

Why not just put him in jail? Wait. You don’t think he’s actually a criminal? Trump was lying?

 

[OODA_Loop]

Why not just put him in jail? Wait. You don’t think he’s actually a criminal? Trump was lying?

Let him have his day in court.

 

[berg80]

Punish him with the process then.

For what?

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Let him have his day in court.

Is he a criminal?

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

For what?

Apparently for not committing a crime or something.

 

[OODA_Loop]

For what?

MSN

“There is a lot of evidence that the congressional Jan. 6 committee intentionally avoided evidence beneficial to Trump’s position, and if Smith did the same, his conduct could be grounds for more severe consequences,

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

MSN

“There is a lot of evidence that the congressional Jan. 6 committee intentionally avoided evidence beneficial to Trump’s position, and if Smith did the same, his conduct could be grounds for more severe consequences,

So he’s a criminal?

 

[OODA_Loop]

So he’s a criminal?

Court will decide that......he appears to be.

Remember: no one is above the law.

 

[berg80]

MSN

“There is a lot of evidence that the congressional Jan. 6 committee intentionally avoided evidence beneficial to Trump’s position, and if Smith did the same, his conduct could be grounds for more severe consequences,

What evidence? Are you implying trump's defense team would not have introduced such evidence at trial?

 

[OODA_Loop]

What evidence?

I haven't seen it but MSN is reporting their is.

 

[Mac1958]

Anyone who tried to hold the orange child accountable is now a target, and everyone knows it.

 

[OODA_Loop]

What evidence? Are you implying trump's defense team would not have introduced such evidence at trial?

What trial?

 

[berg80]

I haven't seen it but MSN is reporting their is.

Let's be specific about who MSN is in this instance. It's a site that peddles horseshit.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

They will have to investigate everyone who has ever talked to Jack Smith.

 

[berg80]

What trial?

The trial of trump facing charges brought by Smith had it been allowed to occur. Had either been allowed to occur.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Court will decide that......he appears to be.

Remember: no one is above the law.

OK, so why did you say he should be punished with “the process”? Instead of jail.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Let's be specific about who MSN is in this instance. It's a site that peddles horseshit.

So now Microsoft News is rightwing?

 

[berg80]

So now Microsoft News is rightwing?

Daily Caller.