Trump Derangement Syndrome

[Delldude]

On full display..............TDS ....things to do around the campfire after you run out of beer?

This is funnier than hell.

 

[jbrownson0831]

On full display..............TDS ....things to do around the campfire after you run out of beer?

This is funnier than hell.

Stupid is as stupid does.....

 

[Captain Caveman]

 

[SassyIrishLass]

On full display..............TDS ....things to do around the campfire after you run out of beer?

This is funnier than hell.

Couple of cucks

 

[DGS49]

The near-psychotic reaction to DOGE (etc) is pure TDS.

Ask yourself what they are protesting against.

Nothing. Just that it's something that Trump is doing.

 

[SmokeALib]

On full display..............TDS ....things to do around the campfire after you run out of beer?

This is funnier than hell.

Like my Dad use to always tell me - There's no fool like an old fool.

 

[Delldude]

Like my Dad use to always tell me - There's no fool like an old fool.

There are old fools and bold fools but there are no old bold fools.

 

[luiza]

Cowardly lot--- the small bunch of Lefty Troll Bots here .
Not a peep from them .

You would think that they might have sent a couple of their juniors like Crappy or Horsey Horse to at least give us more soppy one liners .

Come on Horsey -- tell us how you helped kill your fellow Americans by bad mouthing the best immediate Covid treatment --- Ivermectin .

 

[Cassandro]

Derangement is a very appropriate term. Why else would they act out their hatred of someone they have never met?

 

[Doc7505]

On full display..............TDS ....things to do around the campfire after you run out of beer?

This is funnier than hell.

~~~~~~

Trump Derangement Syndrome Will Destroy The Judicial Branch​

Americans intuitively understand that the judiciary’s primary role is to protect the rights of American citizens, not those of bureaucracies.​

Trump Derangement Syndrome Will Destroy The Judicial Branch

Americans intuitively understand that the judiciary’s primary role is to protect the rights of American citizens, not those of bureaucracies.

thefederalist.com

26 Mar 2025 ~~ By Joseph LoBue

President Donald Trump and the courts are in a turf war over the reach of executive and judicial powers. The conflict results from a barrage of nationwide injunctions issued against the Trump administration by left-leaning judges on matters that Trump claims fall within the purview of the executive branch.
In a recent opinion piece in The New York Times, retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig claims that the courts will win this struggle. The opposite is true. The judicial branch will destroy itself — just like the Democratic Party did — if it stubbornly continues to fight Trump on the very issues that put him back into the White House.
The Judiciary Has Few Weapons in a Turf War With the Executive
Struggles between the executive and judicial branches date back almost to the founding of our country — to the 1803 Supreme Court decision in Marbury v. Madison. The Supreme Court ruled then that federal courts have a power of “judicial review” over the acts of the legislative and executive branches. The ruling rested largely on the proposition that “t is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” That is, courts have the power to state what the law “is,” which is merely to say, the power to issue judgments and orders reflecting what the written words of the laws mean.
Co-Equal Means Co-Equal, Not Subordinate
The Constitution establishes a well-defined structure of federal government. Legislative power is vested in Congress. Executive power is vested in the president. Judicial power is vested in the courts. This means that Congress gets to write what the laws say. The courts get to say what the laws mean. And the president — and only the president — gets to execute the laws, whatever those laws say, and whatever those laws mean.
~Snip~
Ultimately, our constitutional system empowers the people to arbitrate conflicts between the branches, whether directly through subsequent presidential elections or indirectly through their other duly-elected representatives in Congress. In the terms of Marbury v. Madison, in a dispute between branches, it is emphatically the province and duty of the people to say what the law is.
Trump Derangement Syndrome Will Destroy the Judiciary
The people’s deference to the judiciary is not unlimited. The courts can weaken their moral authority quickly with over-reaching rulings, particularly when those rulings reek of personal animus toward one man — i.e., “Trump Derangement Syndrome” — rather than rational decision-making. The so-called “resistance” will play well to the “elites” but not to the people who put the president into office to do the very things that are being resisted.
Americans intuitively understand that the judiciary’s primary role is to protect the rights of American citizens, not the “rights” of federal bureaucracies and foreign interests. They also understand that the president’s core functions include managing the executive branch and protecting Americans from foreign threats. They do not need to reread the Constitution with every dispute to remain convinced of these things.
Americans will tolerate some level of Ivy-League-trained manipulation at the margins of constitutional interpretation. However, they are not likely to support judicial micromanagement of personnel- and budget-cutting decisions for an organization that is $36 trillion in debt. They will not support judicial meddling in the military, foreign aid, or other foreign affairs. And they certainly will not support a federal judiciary hell-bent on favoring the interests of foreign threats — such as illegal alien law-breakers and Tren de Aragua gang members — at the expense of Americans.
With all due respect, Judge Luttig is wrong. The courts will destroy themselves in a war against Trump on these issues. That is why the Supreme Court is unlikely to let them fight these battles for very long.


Commentary:

“The first thing we do is, let’s kill all the lawyers.” ​

Act IV, Scene II of William Shakespeare’s Henry VI, Part II
Maybe Shakespeare had a point.
Unfortunately, The rotten core of bias and Neo Marxist Democrat Leftist hatred of America in the judges is being revealed daily.
If Judges cannot be impartial or follow the Constitution fire them or charge them bias, and remove them. Like the dizzy big mouthed Rep Crockett (D-TX) says "TAKE THEM DOWN".
Alternatively, perhaps a better approach would be to have the Congress defund all levels of District Judges to State activities. Maybe then they will get the word.
SCOTUS will eventually rule in Trumps favor in “most” of these cases, and in the process restore the courts reputation. But the damage will have already been done by that point in delaying Trumps agenda.
At the present time, Democrats go Judge shopping. seeking out activist Democrat funded appointed judges to do their dirty work.
It comes down to simple facts and logic.
In a system of Co-equal Branches of Government, does the Supreme Court get to have the last word on the question of Judicial Over Reach?

 

[Dr.Know]

When I politely asked a liberal acquaintance why they hate TRUMP / MUSK, she said, its because the party hates him and they know more then me !

 

[MarcATL]

I thought it was a very nice video OP.

Just two American patriots having some harmless fun.

God bless America and God bless it's First Amendment.

 

[Skull]

TDS is real and serious:

It’s Confirmed: Trump is Driving Leftists CRAZY | Frontpage Mag

The only real and lasting cure for Trump Derangement Syndrome.

www.frontpagemag.com

 

[Captain Creeper]

There's lots of TDS in Cuckistan.