postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 21,751
- 12,514
- 1,400
What Trump was trying to do was UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Which BTW is the highest law in the land.
Trump and his allies are quietly “plotting” to “deploy the U.S. Military to quell potential unrest on Inauguration Day” if Trump wins in 2024.
- Thread starter Lakhota
- Start date
kyzr
Diamond Member
Look at Garland protecting Hunter and Joe Biden and then look at Matt Whitaker,
Matt Whitaker wins legitimacy by a mile.
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 79,551
- 58,548
- 3,565
The oath states that service members must obey the orders given to them
postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 21,751
- 12,514
- 1,400
They are oath bound to uphold the Constitution of the United States, above fealty to any person or party.
postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 21,751
- 12,514
- 1,400
Actually it states they must obey all "LAWFUL" orders given to them.
That's why the excuse "I was only following orders" didn't fly at Nuremburg.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,212
- 21,210
- 2,320
From your linked article........"Author David Rohde explains how the “deep state” evolved into a sprawling conspiracy theory."
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 79,551
- 58,548
- 3,565
It should have applied at nuremberg
A soldier in combat is not equipped to decide lawful or unlawfull orders
Its a heads we win, tails you lose situation
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,212
- 21,210
- 2,320
He hasn't. What were you saying about Whitaker's legitimacy?
Trump A.G.’s Toilet-Scamming Days Come Back to Haunt Him
New reports show Matthew Whitaker allegedly tried to stonewall an investigation into his time with World Patent Marketing.
martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,459
- 43,702
- 2,300
"Threatening"
And for every one that did that, there were 5 still putting sand in the gears.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,212
- 21,210
- 2,320
You think burning human beings in gas chambers is ambiguous in terms of it being lawful?
martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,459
- 43,702
- 2,300
So "sure".
The President as ELECTED executive decides those things, not some grade 5 SJW wonk.
martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,459
- 43,702
- 2,300
In your opinion, and the opinion of the SJW wonks in question.
It's amazing you want unelected idiots to have power over an elected President.
kyzr
Diamond Member
Got better links than Vanity Fair?
martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,459
- 43,702
- 2,300
They don't get to decide that and keep their job. They should quit.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,212
- 21,210
- 2,320
Sand in the gears is an interesting way to put threatening to resign over Trump naming an unqualified sycophant as AG because the acting AG wouldn't participate in an attempted coup.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,212
- 21,210
- 2,320
You're missing the obvious. They were trying to defend the constitutional order while Trump was trying to destroy it.
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 79,551
- 58,548
- 3,565
No
But even in that situation what were german officers supposed to do?
Refuse orders and be shot?
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,212
- 21,210
- 2,320
Got any evidence the info is wrong?
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,212
- 21,210
- 2,320
Refuse orders and shoot Hitler.
Similar threads
