There are reductions to protect Trump.There are redactions to protect the innocent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are reductions to protect Trump.There are redactions to protect the innocent.
Your proof?There are reductions to protect Trump.
Y'all remember those documents that the Democrats were pressured to release, and so they released them with no redactions, or only very minimal redations?
Me neither . . .
View attachment 1196444
I'm not.why are you running interference for the rich and powerful that abused under age girls?
I'm not.
I'm pointing out the hypocricy of Democrats (and of course "not Democrats"" who are shocked, shocked! that the Trump administration released redacted documents.
You should also, and not just when called out for only slamming Trump.So you should be condemning BOTH parties.
You should also, and not just when called out for only slamming Trump.
Your usual bloviating, soupysadbro.There are reductions to protect Trump.
I refer you to the Rotherham and it's Labour government on these matters.Think about what you are saying. Saying we have to protect those who were sexual abusing under age girls because of national security.
Is that a nation worth securing?
I took the liberty of searching your history for the term "Epstein" and found zero criticism of the Biden administration for not releasing the undredacted Epstein files. Lot's of bashing of Trump during the Biden administration, though.And yet I do. Both parties are full of sleazeballs destroying the country.
I took the liberty of searching your history for the term "Epstein" and found zero criticism of the Biden administration for not releasing the undredacted Epstein files.
This "oh, yeah, it's both parties because I'm not a Democrat" only comes out when you are called out for the obvious hyper-partisan Trump bashing.
SYBAU Huzzie.Your usual bloviating, soupysadbro.
So, it's fine that Biden did not release the files, because he never had any intention to?Trump and his minions made many promises to release the info. They ran on it.
You can show me if you think that is relevant. I certainly don't remember you condemning it.Biden and his minions made many promises to make the rich pay their fair share.
look at how many times I condemned that.
Apparently, they're very popular in Chicago during polar vortexes.Similar to me never having seen a MAGA hat in the red state of Texas.
So, it's fine that Biden did not release the files, because he never had any intention to?
I wonder why? He's not going to be in the files. Probably not Hunter either, since most of Epstein's girls were older than Hunter liked them.
Anyway, I'm glad that the Trump administration is releasing the files as promised. I'm also glad hat they are following the law and making sure that the names of victims or information about ongoing investigations is not released.
Imagine the schreeching from the left if Bondi accidentally left one name of victim exposed. rightful screeching for once, so I'm glad she's taking her time and doing it right.
You can show me if you think that is relevant. I certainly don't remember you condemning it.
Did they?Why did they redact photos that were unredacted when they got them?
Trying to Insinuate 20 something young ladies were teeny boppers and got caught with their hand in the cookie jar.......![]()
No thanks.Since you like to search, actually search how much I condemned Biden and Hunter.
No, we don't. The time to condemn would be when we know.We do not know that they will.
The law is the law, and even Epstein's victims cannot have the law broken because of what they say."Running interference again. Many of the women who were abused are saying it is not being done right.