Trump Admin Deports Barbaric Criminals to a Tiny African Country You’ve Probably Never Heard Of.

Hollie

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
72,172
Reaction score
30,151
Points
2,290

Let’s see if Van Hollen and Wasserma Schultz are making reservations at the Eswatini Hilton and requesting the bar menu to have their drinks waiting.


All of a sudden, the Great Satan Gator Alcatraz accommodations don’t look half bad.

5 men deported to tiny African nation of Eswatini after DHS claims they are ‘individuals so uniquely barbaric that their home countries refused to take them back’​


 
If they are that bad they should be in prison. Not some third world country.
 
If they are that bad they should be in prison. Not some third world country.
You should send a strongly worded email to DHS along with a check for the return flight.

Prison seems kinda’ harsh, no? They’re just hard working lettuce pickers contributing to the economy.
 
If they are that bad they should be in prison. Not some third world country.

If the Tremendous Kingdom of Eswatini thinks they are a danger to civil order in Eswatini, I'm sure they will be sent to a prison in that country.

But these are ILLEGAL aliens, so they really don't have a right to stay in America.

Fortunately for them, Eswatini is willing to accept them.
 
If the Tremendous Kingdom of Eswatini thinks they are a danger to civil order in Eswatini, I'm sure they will be sent to a prison in that country.

But these are ILLEGAL aliens, so they really don't have a right to stay in America.

I never said they did.

Fortunately for them, Eswatini is willing to accept them.

And if as bad as claimed, I'm sure that is where they will stay............
 
I never said they did.



And if as bad as claimed, I'm sure that is where they will stay............

Eswatini , like many countries, has problems. But it also has a rich, vibrant culture.

These new migrants aren't like to be interested in politics, so the fact that Eswatini is an absolute monarchy shouldn't bother them. And Eswatini's problem with aids should allude them, as long as they avoid taking it in the keister.
 
Eswatini , like many countries, has problems. But it also has a rich, vibrant culture.

These new migrants aren't like to be interested in politics, so the fact that Eswatini is an absolute monarchy shouldn't bother them. And Eswatini's problem with aids should allude them, as long as they avoid taking it in the keister.

Just become model citizens........
 
Italy tried to use the US South much the same way in the 1890s. The surviving Italian immigrants fled back to Italy as fast as they could.
 
If the Tremendous Kingdom of Eswatini thinks they are a danger to civil order in Eswatini, I'm sure they will be sent to a prison in that country.

But these are ILLEGAL aliens, so they really don't have a right to stay in America.

Fortunately for them, Eswatini is willing to accept them.

4th Amendment. Just because you say so doesn't make it legal. You only wish to use the small parts of the Constitution when it coincides with your fantasy. First we get them in front of a judge and the judge decides what to do with them. The 4th reads "All Persons" and not "Only Select Citizens".
 
4th Amendment. Just because you say so doesn't make it legal. You only wish to use the small parts of the Constitution when it coincides with your fantasy. First we get them in front of a judge and the judge decides what to do with them. The 4th reads "All Persons" and not "Only Select Citizens".
Illegal aliens are not citizens.

Further, don’t feel a need to lecture others on the Constitution when leftists literally ignored the Constitution with their importation of 12 million plus illegals and terrorists.
 
15th post
4th Amendment. Just because you say so doesn't make it legal. You only wish to use the small parts of the Constitution when it coincides with your fantasy. First we get them in front of a judge and the judge decides what to do with them. The 4th reads "All Persons" and not "Only Select Citizens".
The full text of the 4th:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

There is nothing unreasonable about sending people who break the law to sneak into the U.S. right back where they belong.

if you have a trespasser in your house, do you or police need a warrant to remove him?
 
Illegal aliens are not citizens.

Further, don’t feel a need to lecture others on the Constitution when leftists literally ignored the Constitution with their importation of 12 million plus illegals and terrorists.

Stop right there. The 4th Amendment says Persons and not Citizens. And the word ALL proceeds Persons. That means, anyone within the confines of the United States and it's territories must be afforded the 4th amendment.
 
Stop right there. The 4th Amendment says Persons and not Citizens. And the word ALL proceeds Persons. That means, anyone within the confines of the United States and it's territories must be afforded the 4th amendment.
Hold on Bunky. There’s a small complication when the person spas you want to protect are illegal aliens.

Yours was quite the dance avoiding the democrat importation of millions of illegals.
 
The full text of the 4th:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

There is nothing unreasonable about sending people who break the law to sneak into the U.S. right back where they belong.
You print the 4th amendment and then you piss all over it. Notice "Probable Cause". If you, as a citizen, are detained and the cop didn't have a resonable reason for the stop. And if he doesn't, anything the cop gains from that stop is deemed illegal and therefore cannot be used.

if you have a trespasser in your house, do you or police need a warrant to remove him?

It's your house. That means YOU are the one that gives the permission for entry and by whom. You are just throwing crap at the wall and seeing what may or may not stick. You remind me of the Monkey House.
 
Back
Top Bottom