C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Too bad nobody knows where the hell Obama was born.
Honolulu, Hawaii, August 1961.
Case closed.
Not true! No REAL proof !![]()
So much for republicans not saying stupid things.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Too bad nobody knows where the hell Obama was born.
Honolulu, Hawaii, August 1961.
Case closed.
Not true! No REAL proof !![]()
No, you didn't. You answered as a coward would, afraid to say what is really on his mind.
But you know what's "really on his mind"? What are you, the Amazing fucking Kreskin?
No, you didn't. You answered as a coward would, afraid to say what is really on his mind.
But you know what's "really on his mind"? What are you, the Amazing fucking Kreskin?
No, you didn't. You answered as a coward would, afraid to say what is really on his mind.
But you know what's "really on his mind"? What are you, the Amazing fucking Kreskin?
Actually it's unfair of either of us to expect a public school example - or possible public school dropout - to have ever heard of Becket.
Even more wrong, on the off chance he/she/it had heard rumors of Becket to have any comprehension of the meaning of the tale and how it applies in spades in this particular instance.
T'was my bad in the first place to exceed his/her/its previously demonstrated limitations.
I will be "thanking" you for this very soon, buddy. Always appreciate for the good material you provide for which you can be "thanked"!
Libs, ashamed of their failure to vet their candidate, try to turn it against others.
Distraction.
They think they're good at it.
Almost as good as they are at restoring employment.
But not quite.
I find your conclusions contradict your statements and your thread title.
Which one are you endorsing?
Cruz IS qualified to be POTUS?
Or, Cruz IS NOT qualified to be POTUS?
Hes qualified in accordance with the Constitution.
Hes not qualified as a consequence of his reactionaryism and advocacy of failed conservative fiscal dogma.
Where is there an ideological test to become president? Yeah, nowhere. Cruz espouses the successful policies of Ronald Reagan, not the failed policies of Barack Obama.
As for the OP, it is total bullshit. Cruz is a native born American citizen.
Correct. Here is a good chart on the different types of Citizen:Hes qualified in accordance with the Constitution.
Hes not qualified as a consequence of his reactionaryism and advocacy of failed conservative fiscal dogma.
Where is there an ideological test to become president? Yeah, nowhere. Cruz espouses the successful policies of Ronald Reagan, not the failed policies of Barack Obama.
As for the OP, it is total bullshit. Cruz is a native born American citizen.
Why are you deflecting? The OP said natural, not native.
The business about eligibility is moot.
Still, Cruz likely won't run.
I will be very much surprised in there is a clear Republican candidate for another 12-18 months and it will likely be a dark horse not yet even on the radar. Of course if the horse is female and dark enough then its chances would be enhanced.
Who knows, with all the protections being created for differing gender orientations, it might be possible for an actual horse to run without constitutional challenge.
Correct. Here is a good chart on the different types of Citizen:Where is there an ideological test to become president? Yeah, nowhere. Cruz espouses the successful policies of Ronald Reagan, not the failed policies of Barack Obama.
As for the OP, it is total bullshit. Cruz is a native born American citizen.
Why are you deflecting? The OP said natural, not native.
![]()
The business about eligibility is moot.
Still, Cruz likely won't run.
I will be very much surprised in there is a clear Republican candidate for another 12-18 months and it will likely be a dark horse not yet even on the radar. Of course if the horse is female and dark enough then its chances would be enhanced.
Who knows, with all the protections being created for differing gender orientations, it might be possible for an actual horse to run without constitutional challenge.
If they allow a horse's ass, you're a shoo-in.
If I recall correctly, Vincent died because he knew too much.Alas, I am drawn into enabling. Doing the job public schools failed to accomplish though they may have tried and were rebuffed.
To understand the relation ship between Mrs. Clinton and the death of Vince Foster one must grasp the meaning of the ancient tale of how Becket came to die. Now that doesn't mean having looked at the cover of a comic book purporting to crib the tale for the language-impaired. It doesn't call for mere sounding out of the words.
So I guess I have to try where others have failed.
Here's a link to the tale.
The Murder of Thomas Becket, 1170
Once you have understood what happened to Becket and who bore responsibility you might be positioned to examine the Clinton/Foster discussion from a position other than abject stupidity.
But probably not.
If I recall correctly, Vincent died because he knew too much.
Finally, a conservative sees the truth about Cruz.
The idea that a man, born a subject of Queen Elizabeth II, within one of her realms, is a natural born citizen of the USA, is laughable.