Trickle Down economics

Thank you, Flash, for showing that you don't understand.

Trickle down only helps Big Business, no one else.
I dunno. Big Business employs lots of people; provides wages and salaries, health insurance, pension plans, profit sharing, matching contributions to retirement savings, etc. They also provide employee training programs, contribute to charities, provide expertise to government agencies.
 
I dunno. Big Business employs lots of people; provides wages and salaries, health insurance, pension plans, profit sharing, matching contributions to retirement savings, etc. They also provide employee training programs, contribute to charities, provide expertise to government agencies.
But it does not spread the wealth as it could among the lower classes.
 
If it did the money would be back in their hands within days. The 'lower classes' are low for a reason; they are poor managers.
Give them practice and steady flow, they will get good. You did, and you came up the hard way. So did I.
 
You don't have to be supersmart to understand this. Trickle Down is easy to understand: if you are not robbed by the feds and corporations, you become richer.
 
You don't have to be supersmart to understand this. Trickle Down is easy to understand: if you are not robbed by the feds and corporations, you become richer.
gc93jbtnl0cb1.jpg
 
You don't have to be supersmart to understand this. Trickle Down is easy to understand: if you are not robbed by the feds and corporations, you become richer.
 
You don't have to be supersmart to understand this. Trickle Down is easy to understand: if you are not robbed by the feds and corporations, you become richer.

But when Trickle Down economics is put into practice, the rich and the federal gov't DO take more than their share. The "trickle" never reaches below the rich.
 
But when Trickle Down economics is put into practice, the rich and the federal gov't DO take more than their share. The "trickle" never reaches below the rich.
lies. In the 1920s, the feds and corporations wiped their noses, all the money remained in local places. This is what the Progressives did. The Stalinists had to forcibly extort wealth from the population.
 
rupol2000
This is the Keynesianism of the left and the Trumpists. If the rich don't take your money, you won't get poorer, and they won't get richer. You talk like a cretin.
How do the rich take our money?
 
You don't have to be supersmart to understand this. Trickle Down is easy to understand: if you are not robbed by the feds and corporations, you become richer.
How are we robbed by the corporations?
 
How are we robbed by the corporations?
 
The trickle down economy works whenever the feds and corporations stop robbing the people. If wealth doesn't stay down, it goes to the oligarchs
Trickle Down economics is a myth – a lie Republicans resort to in an effort to ‘justify’ reckless, irresponsible tax cuts.
 
You don't have to be supersmart to understand this. Trickle Down is easy to understand: if you are not robbed by the feds and corporations, you become richer.
i can understand bring robbed by the feds

All the endless social programs that marxists love so much are taking money from one person and giving it to someone else

Medicaid, section 8 housing, food stamps are good examples of that

But gouging corporations only hurts people who who are productive since all corporate taxes are passed along to the consumer
 
The trickle down economy works whenever the feds and corporations stop robbing the people. If wealth doesn't stay down, it goes to the oligarchs
Obama disagrees with you wholly.
He, not Reagan, used trickle down economics more than any other President. It isn't even close.
 
But this is everyone who votes for Democrats and Trumpists.

The essence of corporatism is precisely this: to take away the rights to property from a slave. A slave gives up property rights in exchange for the right to be part of a corporation. Therefore, they take taxes, arrange inflation and so on.
Welcome to planet earth.
Where have you been?

Reaganomics would have been good for everyone if the antitrust laws and proper tax laws had been enforced.

Not even counting the $20 trillion shift in personal wealth to the top 1%, the national debt was only in the billions until 1980. After 9/11 it's gone from $5 trillion to over $30 trillion.
 
i can understand bring robbed by the feds

All the endless social programs that marxists love so much are taking money from one person and giving it to someone else

Medicaid, section 8 housing, food stamps are good examples of that

But gouging corporations only hurts people who who are productive since all corporate taxes are passed along to the consumer
Marxists are corporatists, only they want the Prussians to run everything.
 
Obama disagrees with you wholly.
He, not Reagan, used trickle down economics more than any other President. It isn't even close.
Obama is a dumb man, instead of reading books, he smoked marijuana.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom