Detroit Riverfront then.....
Detroit Riverfront now....
My Detroit Neighborhood then......
My Detroit Neighborhood now....
No doubt all is not peachy keen in Detroit, but it is not all hell and warfare either. I could probably go to any large city where the population is shrinking and take pictures of abandoned and dilapidated buildings. I could also write volumes about the various levels of corruption in city, county, and state politics here.
But I can also write volumes about all the efforts going into reviving the city, including
- installation of an Emergency Financial Manager to fix the city's debt problems and right size the infrastructure
- A massive cooperative effort on the part of major businesses to provide the city new EMS units and police vehicles
- Investment in businesses and real estate by influential billionaires (Dan Gilbert, CEO of Quicken Loans, owner of Cleveland Cavaliers, has purchased 17 buildings downtown and laid out a comprehensive plan to bring businesses into downtown to occupy them. I doubt he's doing that with the expectation of losing money in a dying city. Hard to become a billionaire thinking like that)
The point is to achieve accuracy and balance.
As for the original point of the thread....here's my opinion.....
Labor unions were necessary and very useful in the early 1900s, on through to the late 1980s. They were responsible for a lot of the societal gains that to this day make life pleasant for families that have benefitted from fair wages and benefits. But in the mid to late 1980s, something very significant happened. The US was forced to compete....REALLY compete, on a global basis. First the steel industry was lost to the Japanese steel industry. Then the camera, copier, and television industries. Then the garment industry was lost to Hong Kong and China.
US companies could not compete with companies from overseas who did not have to play by the same rules that the home team had to play by. That created an immediate and unfair disadvantage for the American industry. At first, the typical labor union approach was to call plays from the same playbook that worked during days of greater prosperity and US dominance in the world marketplace. Sorta like calling a blitz in the 7th inning. Great play, wrong sport.
So then the BIG unions morphed. They branched out and started to grow by entwining themselves into different industries, to compensate for shrinkage in their primary industries. The "A" in UAW went from "Automobile" to include Aerospace, and Agricultural. BIG unions also became, in my opinion, too involved in the strategic running of the business. It's one thing to protect the rights and benefits of workers. It's a completely different thing to TELL companies what products to build and where to build them, or what products they cannot get rid of because a handful of dues paying members might have to relocate.