"Treatment of Mamdani shows Islamophobia is still socially acceptable"

Um no

Like always in many threads you are a proven ******* liar

Reagan did not fund binladen nor did he ever say anything about him.

Few muslims were bothered for being muslim as a result of 911

There was no epidemic of retribution or violence against Muslims in the US after 911.

Much like Mamdani hhimself you are are dreaming shit up because the facts prove you wrong chicken hawk
 
27.
BFD.

Why not?
Look at Sliwa, hell look at Trump, Two nobodies who lied a LOT.
27 years is not 30+. If you're black I get it, after all you have only 20 fingers and toes so you can't count any higher.

Trump a nobody? The most famous and powerful person in the world in living memory a nobody?

Nah, you and I are nobodies, certainly not Trump
 
Yes and fighting our enemy which was the point.
Not all deaths from cards are caused by drunk drivers.

Either way he is correct ford is not responsible for those killed by cars and Reagan is not responsible for bin laden.

Your lame and weak efforts to suggest otherwise are stupid and weak
JoeB is just nuts. He lives in a shithole with a mail-order wife who probably doesn't understand English, otherwise she would find him as insufferable as everyone else.
 
27 years is not 30+. If you're black I get it, after all you have only 20 fingers and toes so you can't count any higher.

Trump a nobody? The most famous and powerful person in the world in living memory a nobody?
He was before he lied his way into being president.
Now he is famous for destroying America.

Nah, you and I are nobodies, certainly not Trump
Trump is no one to look up too.
It's like looking up to Benedict Arnold.
 
He was before he lied his way into being president.
Now he is famous for destroying America.


Trump is no one to look up too.
It's like looking up to Benedict Arnold.
Lied his way twice?

Anyway, deporting Biden's illegals and beating two idiot females in two elections is someone that I can certainly look up to despite a nobody's whining.
 
Yes and fighting our enemy which was the point.
Not all deaths from cards are caused by drunk drivers.

Either way he is correct ford is not responsible for those killed by cars and Reagan is not responsible for bin laden.

Your lame and weak efforts to suggest otherwise are stupid and weak

Okay, a whole lot of problems with your analogy.

Funding Muslim fanatics in Afghanistan did not bring down the USSR. (In fact, the communist regime in Kabul wasn't finally toppled until a few years after the USSR disintigrated.

But what we left behind was a network of Islamic Fanatics, flush with victory who said, 'Okay, now let's get the Americans and Zionists!"
 
Um, Bin Laden happened because Ronnie Ray-gun funded him.

Even called him a "Freedom Fighter".

Of those 2997 people killed on 9/11, 200 were Arab-Americans just doing their jobs.

And despite commendable actions by George W. Bush to denounce anti-Islamic violence, a lot of Islamic people (not to mention Sikhs and Hindus, because some of you Bubba Rednecks can't tell the difference) were victims of violence.

Just like a lot of Asians (not just Japanese-Americans) were victims of violence after Pearl Harbor.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

FDR, democrat, brought us the internment camps. Segregation, division, slavery, internment camps...........liberal depravity knows no depth.
 
FDR, democrat, brought us the internment camps. Segregation, division, slavery, internment camps...........liberal depravity knows no depth.

Okay, let's look at this claim.

Internment camps- Kind of awful. Both parties enthusiastically supported them at the time, including both Republican Governor Earl Warren and the justices on the Supreme Court in Korematsu v. US. So argument fail.

Segregation existed before FDR got there, and he did quite a lot to start the process of ending it. Argument Fail #2.

Slavery existed before FDR and ended about 80 years before he got there. It existed before there was a United States, much less a Democratic Party. Argument Fail #3.
 
Okay, a whole lot of problems with your analogy.

Funding Muslim fanatics in Afghanistan did not bring down the USSR. (In fact, the communist regime in Kabul wasn't finally toppled until a few years after the USSR disintigrated.

But what we left behind was a network of Islamic Fanatics, flush with victory who said, 'Okay, now let's get the Americans and Zionists!"
No one said they brought down the USSR you idiot

You always argue against something no one else said because you are weak and stupid
 
15th post
He called the fighters in Afghanistan "Freedom Fighters". One of those fighters was Osama Bin Laden.

Case closed.
Case open

You are backpedaling.

You originally accused Reagan of calling BIN LADEN a freedom fighter which is one of your typical bald faced lies
 
Okay, let's look at this claim.

Internment camps- Kind of awful. Both parties enthusiastically supported them at the time, including both Republican Governor Earl Warren and the justices on the Supreme Court in Korematsu v. US. So argument fail.

Segregation existed before FDR got there, and he did quite a lot to start the process of ending it. Argument Fail #2.

Slavery existed before FDR and ended about 80 years before he got there. It existed before there was a United States, much less a Democratic Party. Argument Fail #3.

No, none of these failed. Liberals championed all of these egregious acts. FDR let the internment camps which was just another aspect of segregation and slavery.
 
Okay, a whole lot of problems with your analogy.

Funding Muslim fanatics in Afghanistan did not bring down the USSR. (In fact, the communist regime in Kabul wasn't finally toppled until a few years after the USSR disintigrated.

But what we left behind was a network of Islamic Fanatics, flush with victory who said, 'Okay, now let's get the Americans and Zionists!"

Funding Muslim fanatics in Afghanistan did not bring down the USSR.

It was an important part.
 
Back
Top Bottom