I know, democrats are criminals, so protecting democrat criminals is what they do.
Basic problem that you have is that you know “the Democrats are criminals”. You start with that conclusion, and then look for evidence to support it.
That’s the premise of every Republican investigation of Democrats. The Democrats are guilty, and we’re going to find the evidence to prove it. And it fails every single time.
Instead of following actual evidence uncovered, anything that doesn’t point to the Democrat’s guilt, is dismissed as “lies”. Most of the Clinton Investigations ended with a report stating not only that they found no evidence that the Clinton’s committed a crime, they found no evidence that any crime was committed.
Uranium One being a case in point. Every investigation of Uranium One, and there have been several of them, says that Hillary did nothing on that file except sign a Consent her technical department advised her to sign on behalf of the State Department.
The “bribe” was paid to the Clinton Foundation a full two years after the Uranium One deal closed. Bribes are generally paid to get the clearances necessary to close the deal. Why would you need to bribe someone two years after you close the deal?
The fact that multiple agencies have been looking at these transactions for years and found nothing amiss, speaks volumes. Hunter Biden’s explanation of these transactions is both reasonable and consistent with similar overseas investment and consulting groups.
As previously pointed out, Burisma didn’t fire Hunter Biden when it’s Chairman was prosecuted and fined. And as I pointed out, they didn’t fire him when his father was out of office, and no help to them at all. Hunter. Biden left when his father announced he was running for President.
Last but not least, nothing in the documents, presented by Comer in either of his Memos, supports the narrative he is spinning. It’s easy to convince those not involved in the fields of accounting or tax law, that this “looks shady”. The first time I saw one of these deals my reaction was “what are we trying to do here?”, and “is this all legal?”.
After reading the first few pages of Comer’s Memo, it was clear that’s what he was doing. A friend who used to work in international banking, asked me for the link, and he concurred with my assessment of the memo. That was before Time magazine, called it “a swing and a miss”.
www.nbcnews.com
