Anomalism
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2020
- 11,541
- 8,637
- 2,138
Every physicist on Earth claims gravity exists. They all say the same thing. That's not science, that's groupthink. Consensus isn't evidence.
Who funds gravity research? Governments and universities. Who benefits? Physicists who build careers and get grants by "studying" gravity. Follow the money.
Have you ever actually SEEN gravity? No. You've seen things fall. That's correlation, not causation. Nobody has ever directly observed a gravitational force. These people operate on faith.
Use your eyes. Does spacetime LOOK curved to you?
Newton's laws were written over 300 years ago. Science has moved on since then. Why are we still trusting theories from the 1700s? Then Einstein comes along and completely changes the story. First gravity is a force, now it's "curved spacetime." Which is it? They can't even keep their models consistent.
And spacetime itself is just a mathematical construct. You can't bend math. That's not physics, that's metaphysics. They still can't fully reconcile gravity with quantum mechanics. Their own models are incomplete. But we're supposed to trust them completely?
If gravity is real, why doesn't it work in space? Astronauts float. Planets don't fall into the Sun. Seems selective. They say gravity is constant, but a feather and a bowling ball fall at different speeds. That's not even internally consistent.
Funny how gravity only exists when you're on Earth, but disappears when it's inconvenient.
There are physicists who question general relativity. You never hear about them. Why do you think that is? The establishment doesn't tolerate dissent.
They call it the "theory" of gravity. Theory. Not law. Not fact. By their own admission, it's not proven.
Galileo was persecuted for questioning the scientific consensus of his time. Now dissenters are being attacked for doing the same thing. Interesting.
The scientific establishment has been wrong before. Phlogiston. Luminiferous ether. Miasma theory. But sure, THIS time they've definitely got it right.
At what point do we admit this is just an unproven theory propped up by institutions and social pressure? I'm not claiming to have all the answers. I'm just asking questions. If the theory is solid, why are they so threatened by scrutiny?
Who funds gravity research? Governments and universities. Who benefits? Physicists who build careers and get grants by "studying" gravity. Follow the money.
Have you ever actually SEEN gravity? No. You've seen things fall. That's correlation, not causation. Nobody has ever directly observed a gravitational force. These people operate on faith.
Use your eyes. Does spacetime LOOK curved to you?
Newton's laws were written over 300 years ago. Science has moved on since then. Why are we still trusting theories from the 1700s? Then Einstein comes along and completely changes the story. First gravity is a force, now it's "curved spacetime." Which is it? They can't even keep their models consistent.
And spacetime itself is just a mathematical construct. You can't bend math. That's not physics, that's metaphysics. They still can't fully reconcile gravity with quantum mechanics. Their own models are incomplete. But we're supposed to trust them completely?
If gravity is real, why doesn't it work in space? Astronauts float. Planets don't fall into the Sun. Seems selective. They say gravity is constant, but a feather and a bowling ball fall at different speeds. That's not even internally consistent.
Funny how gravity only exists when you're on Earth, but disappears when it's inconvenient.
There are physicists who question general relativity. You never hear about them. Why do you think that is? The establishment doesn't tolerate dissent.
They call it the "theory" of gravity. Theory. Not law. Not fact. By their own admission, it's not proven.
Galileo was persecuted for questioning the scientific consensus of his time. Now dissenters are being attacked for doing the same thing. Interesting.
The scientific establishment has been wrong before. Phlogiston. Luminiferous ether. Miasma theory. But sure, THIS time they've definitely got it right.
At what point do we admit this is just an unproven theory propped up by institutions and social pressure? I'm not claiming to have all the answers. I'm just asking questions. If the theory is solid, why are they so threatened by scrutiny?
