Time to Expand the House?

candycorn

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
122,318
Reaction score
65,011
Points
2,605
Location
Occupied Arizona
Each representative speaks for 760,000 people. This number is clearly too large for effective representation.


Most would be gerrymandered, of course. But there will be more purple districts if we increase the number. The larger issue is, of course, how to expand it and to what number. I don’t know the former. The latter...we need to essentially double the size of the house. Espansion should take place in three stages over 16 years. This would eleviate any shocks to the system to where there are too many of any one party elected at once. Whats more is that this can (and likely will) create seats for third parties since it will tkae fewer voters to win a seat in Congress.
 
Long past time. Should have happened years ago. We have only the illusion of representation. There was a proposal about 20 years ago to set the number of districts at a number so that no district would be larger than the smallest, which I think was Wyoming at the time.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom