Thousands of Rejected Ballots in Atlanta Were Later Adjudicated and Counted

[The Purge]

According to Georgia state law, if a voter “cast more than the permitted number of votes” on a ballot, it is considered “spoiled,” and the vote “shall not be reinstated.”

Each ballot also has a disclaimer that reads, “If you make a mistake or change your mind or change your mind on a selection do not attempt to mark through the selection or attempt to erase. Write ‘Spoiled’ across the ballot and across the return envelope” and request a new ballot.

But thousands of such votes, called overvotes, originally rejected by vote-counting machines, were later altered by election workers and recounted in Fulton, County, Georgia, reports Just The News.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

No wonder they kept the Republican monitors out

 

[joaquinmiller]

According to Georgia state law, if a voter “cast more than the permitted number of votes” on a ballot, it is considered “spoiled,” and the vote “shall not be reinstated.”

Each ballot also has a disclaimer that reads, “If you make a mistake or change your mind or change your mind on a selection do not attempt to mark through the selection or attempt to erase. Write ‘Spoiled’ across the ballot and across the return envelope” and request a new ballot.

But thousands of such votes, called overvotes, originally rejected by vote-counting machines, were later altered by election workers and recounted in Fulton, County, Georgia, reports Just The News.

Hey, Rocky! Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!

 

[toobfreak]

But thousands of such votes, called overvotes, originally rejected by vote-counting machines, were later altered by election workers and recounted

I just hope they fixed them right and scratched in Joe Biddum's name.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

According to Georgia state law, if a voter “cast more than the permitted number of votes” on a ballot, it is considered “spoiled,” and the vote “shall not be reinstated.”

Each ballot also has a disclaimer that reads, “If you make a mistake or change your mind or change your mind on a selection do not attempt to mark through the selection or attempt to erase. Write ‘Spoiled’ across the ballot and across the return envelope” and request a new ballot.

But thousands of such votes, called overvotes, originally rejected by vote-counting machines, were later altered by election workers and recounted in Fulton, County, Georgia, reports Just The News.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

No wonder they kept the Republican monitors out

You members of the AltTrump-Right will pounce like a pack of wolves over any chunk of meaty hope your Lap Dog Chow media outlets throw to you.

1) There's no evidence any of this happened.
2) From the article, "While it appears that adjudicated ballots wouldn’t have altered the outcome of the election...." This is as far as you need to read because the rest of the paragraph is pure speculation and conspiracy theory mongering. Designed to keep the faithful in a froth and keep their wallets open.

You Trump supporters can see the lie is losing steam slowly but surely.
But y'all hang on to hope. He'll be reinstated......to prison....oh wait, sorry...installed to prison.

 

[toobfreak]

pounce like a pack of wolves over any chunk of meaty hope

Look out folks, Jack is past his dinner time and Mrs. Trades has to fill the bowl with Gravy Train again. Please don't get too close while Jack's eating.

Not only did Jack accidentally leave out that his quote is the OPINION of some off the wall news outlet, but Jack conveniently left out the REST of the quote the little commie didn't want you to read:

"they reveal an imperfect system vulnerable to chaos, subjectivity, or political dirty tricks, especially in a county like Fulton where state officials documented widespread irregularities and misconduct and now want to take over election counting."

That's because chaos, subjectivity, dirty tricks and misconduct though widespread don't concern Jack one bit so long as a crook and a socialist gets in office.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Look out folks, Jack is past his dinner time and Mrs. Trades has to fill the bowl with Gravy Train again. Please don't get too close while Jack's eating.

Not only did Jack accidentally leave out that his quote is the OPINION of some off the wall news outlet, but Jack conveniently left out the REST of the quote the little commie didn't want you to read:

"they reveal an imperfect system vulnerable to chaos, subjectivity, or political dirty tricks, especially in a county like Fulton where state officials documented widespread irregularities and misconduct and now want to take over election counting."

That's because chaos, subjectivity, dirty tricks and misconduct though widespread don't concern Jack one bit so long as a crook and a socialist gets in office.

I said you didn't need to read any further, meatball. The rest of the paragraph is SPECULATION and CONSPIRACY THEORY peddling. No facts, just BS.
Same shit that's been postulated...and shot down for the last nine months. There were no irregularities found.
He lost. Move on. If you haven't noticed lately, the tide is starting to turn. Keep on this path, and you true believers will end up doing
to the Republican party..EXACTLY what your savior did to the two Senate races in GA.

 

[Care4all]

Georgia election code.... They followed the law, had the witnesses from both sides.... a person representing each candidate.... there to witness the adjudication of the spoiled ballot.

Your article says they followed election law/code for handling spoiled ballots....

Nuff said.

If they want more specifics in their manual on how to specifically process them and tighten up their process, there is nothing stopping them from doing such before the next election....

There was no fraud, or cheating or stealing....they followed election code.

2010 Georgia Code :: TITLE 21 - ELECTIONS :: CHAPTER 2 - ELECTIONS AND PRIMARIES GENERALLY :: ARTICLE 11 - PREPARATION FOR AND CONDUCT OF PRIMARIES AND ELECTIONS :: PART 5 - PRECINCTS USING OPTICAL SCANNING VOTING EQUIPMENT :: § 21-2-483 - Count

law.justia.com

 

[Care4all]

In person voting, the optical scanner will reject the voter's ballot, notifying the voter they need to request a new ballot if they want to correct the over vote/or spoiled ballot.

There is not that option with an absentee ballot.... No one there to give you a new ballot.... It has to be adjudicated by the appropriate and assigned people under election code after ballot arrives at voting precinct.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

the democrat cult is going to lie and deny any election rigging and try to discredit the audits and the yellow press is going to help them

 

[toobfreak]

I said you didn't need to read any further, meatball.

You didn't WANT people to read any farther, dirtball! You're in no position to be telling anyone what they need to read or not.

The rest of the paragraph is SPECULATION and CONSPIRACY THEORY peddling. No facts, just BS.

Odd, the "rest of the paragraph" was written by the same source AS THE ONE YOU QUOTED! And it doesn't say a thing about any part of it being "speculative!" You lie like a 12 year old. Again, screw you and the garage you rode in on, shithead---- HOW DARE YOU tell us one part of a sentence from an obscure opinion piece practically resolves the entire election dispute by itself, then go on to presuppose that the rest of the statement is worthless gossamer speculation! Jack, you are one colossal JERK; where the hell do you get off peddling your condescending gaslighting bullshit, picking and choosing what we should believe, what we should read, even telling us what we should BELIEVE.

Tell us Jack, do little Nazis like you wear little Nazi brown pajamas to bed, too?

Same shit that's been postulated...and shot down for the last nine months.

NO, asshole, I have you on record here disclaiming ALL of the election disputes from Trump as baseless and debunked on the 11th of November! LONG before the court hearings, LONG before the investigations (which are still ongoing), both of which you've used repeatedly as your excuse to justify your claims like that other POS, Glove, but THEY DIDN'T EVEN EXIST at the time you made your claims! That proves you to be just one more infected pustule of lies, deceit and misinfiormation working at the hands of the socialist democrats. You have been EXPOSED.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

You didn't WANT people to read any farther, dirtball! You're in no position to be telling anyone what they need to read or not.


Odd, the "rest of the paragraph" was written by the same source AS THE ONE YOU QUOTED! And it doesn't say a thing about any part of it being "speculative!" You lie like a 12 year old. Again, screw you and the garage you rode in on, shithead---- HOW DARE YOU tell us one part of a sentence from an obscure opinion piece practically resolves the entire election dispute by itself, then go on to presuppose that the rest of the statement is worthless gossamer speculation! Jack, you are one colossal JERK; where the hell do you get off peddling your condescending gaslighting bullshit, picking and choosing what we should believe, what we should read, even telling us what we should BELIEVE.

Tell us Jack, do little Nazis like you wear little Nazi brown pajamas to bed, too?


NO, asshole, I have you on record here disclaiming ALL of the election disputes from Trump as baseless and debunked on the 11th of November! LONG before the court hearings, LONG before the investigations (which are still ongoing), both of which you've used repeatedly as your excuse to justify your claims like that other POS, Glove, but THEY DIDN'T EVEN EXIST at the time you made your claims! That proves you to be just one more infected pustule of lies, deceit and misinfiormation working at the hands of the socialist democrats. You have been EXPOSED.

It SAID NOTHING..asshat. The article is a lesson in in whipping up the froth in you willing true believers who won't think for themselves. After making a one sentence disclaimer that what they are bitching about wouldn't have affected the results, they proceed to keep idiots like you whipped up into a frenzy about non-existent fraud. You are correct on one point, the paragraph and therefore the entire article is worthless speculation.

And you're STILL dealing reverses on the fraud argument. It's not up to me to prove your baseless wet dreams. It's up to you to present the evidence.
So, I'll roll it out in words you can understand, cuck. Start your fucking voter fraud thread or Shut the fuck up.

 

[Quasar44]

The Purge
They had zero signatures checks or signature verifications or stamp dates
The entire thing was a giant fraud

 

[Lastamender]

You members of the AltTrump-Right will pounce like a pack of wolves over any chunk of meaty hope your Lap Dog Chow media outlets throw to you.

1) There's no evidence any of this happened.
2) From the article, "While it appears that adjudicated ballots wouldn’t have altered the outcome of the election...." This is as far as you need to read because the rest of the paragraph is pure speculation and conspiracy theory mongering. Designed to keep the faithful in a froth and keep their wallets open.

You Trump supporters can see the lie is losing steam slowly but surely.
But y'all hang on to hope. He'll be reinstated......to prison....oh wait, sorry...installed to prison.

No cigar. There was massive fraud, and more comes out every day. Biden did not win the election legally. That has become very apparent. He is a fraud, and you are a traitor and a liar.

 

[toobfreak]

You are correct on one point, the paragraph and therefore the entire article is worthless speculation.

Ahha. You mean the article Jack you just held up as sure proof and confirmation that all the election fraud claims have been disproven!

Now I understand why you can't build a garage, Jack, you can't read the numbers on a ruler!

1 --- 2 --- 3 --- . . .

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

No cigar. There was massive fraud, and more comes out every day. Biden did not win the election legally. That has become very apparent. He is a fraud, and you are a traitor and a liar.

Nothing has come out. That's your basic problem. No evidence. No proof. Just your sad little whine fests.
I see that Dominion is lowering the hammer on OAN and Newsmax...time to take out the garbage.

 

[Lastamender]

Nothing has come out. That's your basic problem. No evidence. No proof. Just your sad little whine fests.
I see that Dominion is lowering the hammer on OAN and Newsmax...time to take out the garbage.

The illegal ballots are the proof. They have the ballots to back up what they say. Biden did not win AZ. Fact.

 

[toobfreak]

Nothing has come out.

Except a MOUNTAIN of evidence which you tried denying right after the election long long before anyone even had any chance to investigate any of that. HOW is that possible, Jack?

No evidence. No proof.

No one has any proof of man made climate change or evolution or the big bang theory either yet these are accepted facts. I have evidence of HUNDREDS of irregularities and improprieties, what we need now from you is the evidence or proof showing that each of these has been individually tested and found wrong! WHERE is that Jack?

Just your sad little whine fests.

Just your sad little broken record of excuses that don't hold any water.

I see that Dominion is lowering the hammer on OAN and Newsmax...time to take out the garbage.

Let me hold the lid Jack so you can jump into the can. Just another specious lawsuit like all the rest from Dominion that haven't gone anywhere, designed to just bully and intimidate anyone from taking too close a look at their machines because if they had any REAL answers, they'd simply come forward and offer them!!!

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Except a MOUNTAIN of evidence which you tried denying right after the election long long before anyone even had any chance to investigate any of that. HOW is that possible, Jack?


No one has any proof of man made climate change or evolution or the big bang theory either yet these are accepted facts. I have evidence of HUNDREDS of irregularities and improprieties, what we need now from you is the evidence or proof showing that each of these has been individually tested and found wrong! WHERE is that Jack?


Just your sad little broken record of excuses that don't hold any water.


Let me hold the lid Jack so you can jump into the can. Just another specious lawsuit like all the rest from Dominion that haven't gone anywhere, designed to just bully and intimidate anyone from taking too close a look at their machines because if they had any REAL answers, they'd simply come forward and offer them!!!

How many reverse arguments you gonna deal here, cuck?
Put your proof up. There is no evidence of widespread fraud.
Its up to people like you to make the case. Not the people you are "accusing".

 

[toobfreak]

How many reverse arguments you gonna deal here, cuck?
Put your proof up. There is no evidence of widespread fraud.
Its up to people like you to make the case. Not the people you are "accusing".

Save your breath, Jackwad, you've been making accusations since at least last Nov. 11, and the fact that you evade all my questions never answering any of them proves what a POS scumbag lying dickwad asslicker you really are. You've made accusations right along but never provide and refuse to show the slightest evidence or proof of anything you claim. As to my thread, I have priorities in life as do most people right now that come far ahead of wasting days and days and even weeks on here and many more days and weeks off the group, researching, organizing, typing and presenting a thread that right now, I'm not sure the mods here are fully up to moderating to keep the order and enforce the rules just to see a bunch of ass clowns like you blow it off then make excuses for not participating in then more lies about why not. If I do that thread I know for certain that you'd be the last person to provide anything meaningful to it much less one bit of proof that any of the election fraud claims are wrong.