This will be Key: What are the Most Incriminating things that Michael Cohen Said in his Testimony Today?

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The logic of the testimony holds together. The issue for the jury will they all accept his propensity for telling the truth?

 

[Cougarbear]

LOL The same porn star your orange loser (taken lightly) banged?

Who the fuck cares if you idiots don't think it is a crime? Your orange loser has been indicted and is now cooling his heels in court. What is important is what the jury thinks of the case. Let me know if you are still confused.

An old saying, "He who laughs first shall laugh last." Because of this political communist corruption plot by the Biden-Democrat cult, Trump leads in all swing state polling. As much as 12 percent in Michigan. Keep it up! We just may take over both halls of Congress by a wide margin too. Keep that Putin style of jailing your political foes.

 

[meaner gene]

Nothing muttered by Cohen is credible. But his testiphony is sufficient to send the matter to the jury. It’s NY City, so the complete lack of the perjurer’s testimony may not be considered by the jury.

The jury gets zero say in sentencing, candyass.

The appellate courts will reverse this nonsense assuming the jury robotically votes to convict despite the lack of any credible evidence and despite the nonsense nature of the charge(s).

You seem to think that the jury doesn't know what is necessary for a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. You have two lawyers on the jury who certainly know if the law, and the evidence warrants a finding of guilty.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The logic of the testimony holds together. The issue for the jury will they all accept his propensity for telling the truth?

But what crime does the logic show that Trump committed?

Or should I say, how does it show that Trump falsified a business record with the intent to defraud and to conceal another crime?

That's in the indictment.

 

[BackAgain]

On which sock account?

Again, you lying twat. I don’t have any sick accounts. I never have. How many do you have?

306>232... Biden shit on your blob.

It’s funny when you constantly trot out that insipid “go to” when you’re getting your dopey ass kicked.

Happy to hear that. The judge gets to decide the sentence of the guy that keeps insulting him (if there is one).

Happy to have educated on that minor point. And again, it won’t matter once the sentence and conviction gets overturned on appeal.

 

[meaner gene]

The logic of the testimony holds together. The issue for the jury will they all accept his propensity for telling the truth?

The jury will not trust Cohen to tell the truth. But there is little that Cohen testified to, that hasn't been testified to by Pecker, and others. All Cohen is doing is confirming the documentary evidence they already presented was true.
Plus he is needed to verify the tapes he has of his conversations with Trump and Pecker. His cancelled checks signed by Trump, and his emails with Weisselberg.

 

[Hellokitty]

Michael Cohen, the star witness in Donald Trump’s hush-money trial, told jurors Monday the then-presidential candidate directed him to make a payment to silence a porn star whose story he feared could derail his 2016 election bid.

Cohen testified in a Manhattan courtroom that in the final stretch of the former president’s first campaign, adult-film actress Stormy Daniels threatened to come forward with her allegation of an affair with Trump at a golf event a decade earlier. Trump was fuming because he thought Cohen, his longtime personal lawyer and fixer, had handled the matter five years earlier, Cohen told the jury.

“I thought you had this under control,” Cohen said Trump told him, later instructing, “Just take care of it.”

Trump told Cohen to drag out any negotiations on payment as long as possible. “Just get past the election,” Cohen said Trump told him. “I win, it has no relevance because I’m president, and if I lose, I don’t really care.”

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/michael-cohen-witness-testimony-trump-trial-79b66d8d

What more "connect the dots" you idiots are looking for? Cohen testified that Trump asked him directly to "take care of it".

Pretty damning if you take into account that Cohen has gone to prison for the exact same crime of Campaign Finance Violations relating to paying Stormy.

Cohen said isn't evidence.

 

[meaner gene]

But what crime does the logic show that Trump committed?

Or should I say, how does it show that Trump falsified a business record with the intent to defraud and to conceal another crime?

That's in the indictment.

That other crime could be federal election law, or New York State election law, or even a violation of federal and state income tax laws, since Trump wrote the bribe off as a legal expense.

 

[candycorn]

Again, you lying twat. I don’t have any sick accounts. I never have. How many do you have?

You didn't have previous accounts? LOL

It’s funny when you constantly trot out that insipid “go to” when you’re getting your dopey ass kicked.

306>232...your president--Joe Biden--won the election. He kicked your blob's ass.

Happy to have educated on that minor point. And again, it won’t matter once the sentence and conviction gets overturned on appeal.

Your blob has a losing streak going right now in court. Or haven't you noticed?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

That will be proven by Cohen's testimony if the jury accepts it.

But what crime does the logic show that Trump committed?

Or should I say, how does it show that Trump falsified a business record with the intent to defraud and to conceal another crime?

That's in the indictment.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Cohen said isn't evidence.

The testimony is evidence, as are the documents that back it.

 

[Hellokitty]

The testimony is evidence, as are the documents that back it.

Where are the documents?

 

[Rawley]

That other crime could be federal election law, or New York State election law, or even a violation of federal and state income tax laws, since Trump wrote the bribe off as a legal expense.

1,000 Ratty. Kudos

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Where are the documents?

Introduced earlier as evidence. Don't you follow the trial?

 

[yidnar]

What the fuck do you think we are talking about? Retard. This is your thread. You brought up the issue.

Man, just when I think I trumptards can't get any dumber, you turn up.

 

[yidnar]

The jury will not trust Cohen to tell the truth. But there is little that Cohen testified to, that hasn't been testified to by Pecker, and others. All Cohen is doing is confirming the documentary evidence they already presented was true.
Plus he is needed to verify the tapes he has of his conversations with Trump and Pecker. His cancelled checks signed by Trump, and his emails with Weisselberg.

I have concerns that the hatred of Trump by the leftists overseeing and prosecuting this trial that the juniors will feel pressured to convict .

 

[yidnar]

You didn't have previous accounts? LOL

306>232...your president--Joe Biden--won the election. He kicked your blob's ass.

Your blob has a losing streak going right now in court. Or haven't you noticed?

and that's your biggest hope to win the election .. but what if a conviction actually boosts Trumps support ? and if he isn't convicted it may boost his support ! the Dems may have shot their corrupt Stalinist asses in the foot with there banana republic lawfare .

 

[yidnar]

You didn't have previous accounts? LOL

306>232...your president--Joe Biden--won the election. He kicked your blob's ass.

Your blob has a losing streak going right now in court. Or haven't you noticed?

even your posts contain 2000 calories .. go on a diet .

 

[candycorn]

and that's your biggest hope to win the election .. but what if a conviction actually boosts Trumps support ? and if he isn't convicted it may boost his support ! the Dems may have shot their corrupt Stalinist asses in the foot with there banana republic lawfare .

Its funny to expect a felony conviction to get more support from the average voter. But if it does, it does I guess.

We'll see what happens. I don't recall a lot of sympathy for OJ once he was convicted.

 

[yidnar]

Its funny to expect a felony conviction to get more support from the average voter. But if it does, it does I guess.

We'll see what happens. I don't recall a lot of sympathy for OJ once he was convicted.

lol ! this trial isn't the oj trial ... and yes we shall see ... but hey ! look on the bright side Briben may be able to claim that he will not debate a man found guilty in the corrupt trial ... do you think the basement strategy will work again ? and remember the October surprise that both parties release every election year ... as far as the lefts October surprise ... what more can they do that they haven't already done ? deep down the left is very concerned about the chances of losing the election .