barryqwalsh
Gold Member
- Sep 30, 2014
- 3,397
- 252
- 140
LETTERS
If 324 million Americans, spending billions of dollars on their election process, can’t come up with a better result than a couple of seriously flawed and unpopular candidates who seem to be capable only of dividing the nation, why would we ever contemplate taking the risk of going down a similar path?
The notion of having an elected Australian president sounds fine and democratic until you sit down and try to work out a sensible way for getting a president elected that doesn’t end like this US fiasco. This lends weight to the argument for retaining a constitutional monarchy in Australia — it may not be perfect but it’s better than anything else around.
Chris Lloyd-Bostock,
Connellys Marsh, Tas
- The Australian
- October 12, 2016
If 324 million Americans, spending billions of dollars on their election process, can’t come up with a better result than a couple of seriously flawed and unpopular candidates who seem to be capable only of dividing the nation, why would we ever contemplate taking the risk of going down a similar path?
The notion of having an elected Australian president sounds fine and democratic until you sit down and try to work out a sensible way for getting a president elected that doesn’t end like this US fiasco. This lends weight to the argument for retaining a constitutional monarchy in Australia — it may not be perfect but it’s better than anything else around.
Chris Lloyd-Bostock,
Connellys Marsh, Tas