This is scary

[guno]

He sits on the science and energy committee

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Well yabut, he's one of those incredibly dumb Repubs ... like Bachmann and Gohmert and

Never mind. The list is way too long.

 

[Mr. H.]

He's half correct anyway. Energy is neither created nor destroyed. It's simply transferred.

Do you think there is absolutely no importance to the energy contained in the winds that encircle the earth?

These turbines take energy out of winds, reducing it's purpose and effectiveness. It is a scientific fact that wind turbines disrupt the weather.

...you do believe in science, don't you?

 

[Mr. H.]

Let's expound on this a bit. There are about one billion motorized vehicles on this planet.

World Vehicle Population Tops 1 Billion Units News Analysis content from WardsAuto

By the laws of physics these motorized vehicles consume more gasoline (however infinitesimal) when daytime running lights are activated as well as when headlights are illuminated at night.

How much extra gasoline would Americans use if daytime running lights were mandatory - HowStuffWorks

If we de-activated our daytime running lights and cut down on our nighttime driving, we would save gasoline and reduce the use of fossil fuels thereby reducing the amount of C02 in the atmosphere thereby reducing the effects of "Global Warming".

You with me so far?

Do you even get the fucking picture?

 

[ScienceRocks]

He sits on the science and energy committee

View attachment 44793

This guys a kook

 

[guno]

He's half correct anyway. Energy is neither created nor destroyed. It's simply transferred.

Do you think there is absolutely no importance to the energy contained in the winds that encircle the earth?

These turbines take energy out of winds, reducing it's purpose and effectiveness. It is a scientific fact that wind turbines disrupt the weather.

...you do believe in science, don't you?

Did you ever "think" how much that would take to alter wind patterns over the surface of the earth, ever visit places like mt washington or other very high wind areas.

Please show me the impact studies

"you do believe in science"

Science requires no "belief" science can be demonstrated. and when new information it is updated to reflect the new information as to causes. There is NO ancient book of science that requires "belief" in science

 

[Mr. H.]

He's half correct anyway. Energy is neither created nor destroyed. It's simply transferred.

Do you think there is absolutely no importance to the energy contained in the winds that encircle the earth?

These turbines take energy out of winds, reducing it's purpose and effectiveness. It is a scientific fact that wind turbines disrupt the weather.

...you do believe in science, don't you?

Did you ever "think" how much that would take to alter wind patterns over the surface of the earth, ever visit places like mt washington or other very high wind areas.

Please show me the impact studies

"you do believe in science"

Science requires no "belief" science can be demonstrated. and when new information it is updated to reflect the new information as to causes. There is NO ancient book of science that requires "belief" in science

It's math and physics. Or didn't you get that memo?

 

[Agit8r]

He sits on the science and energy committee

View attachment 44793

He would have us believe that humans DO have the power to cause climate change, as long as it isn't being done by the monied interests that he is beholden to.