Things Zionists never condemn

[toomuchtime_]

You do like to misread stuff don't you, that's the zionist training kicking in I suppose.

It only seems that way to you because you are too stupid to understand what I said.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

It only seems that way to you because you are too stupid to understand what I said.

Yes that'll be the reason.

 

[rosends]

Well the thesis "Islam is a religion of violence" is a different thesis to "Islamic terrorism has been around since 600AD".

We were talking about the latter and the sources I used in support of my position support the view that Islamic terrorism is quite new, starting around mid 20th century.

If one wants to argue that "Islam is a religion of violence" by invoking interpretations of sacred texts then it is easy to show that Judaism too is a religion of violence, much of the recorded history of the Israelites involves violence, why single out the Koran in this respect?

Neither Jews nor Muslims have used terrorism much at all before the rise of extremist Zionism - Islamic terrorism was spawned by Zionist terrorism. It's an abuse of history to speak of Islamic terrorism as being unrelated to extremist Zionism.

Arguably Christian terrorism is far older than Zionist or Islamic terrorism.

There are strong arguments one can form that show how Zionist terrorism in the 1920s, circuitously led to the destruction of the World Trade center eighty years later, there's a causal link between the two.

How do you define Islamic terrorism? If entire villages are killed as Islam forces itself on parts of the world, is that terrorism?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

How do you define Islamic terrorism? If entire villages are killed as Islam forces itself on parts of the world, is that terrorism?

In exactly the same way we define Israeli terrorism, any terrorism.

 

[rosends]

In exactly the same way we define Israeli terrorism, any terrorism.

And what is that way?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

And what is that way?

I suggest you learn these basics before wasting my time pretending to know what you're talking about.

 

[rosends]

I suggest you learn these basics before wasting my time pretending to know what you're talking about.

You want to create a category as distinct from other categories but don't want to define it. OK.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You want to create a category as distinct from other categories but don't want to define it. OK.

If I didn't define it then how can you decide it's distinct from something? This is called logic or in your case an absence thereof.

 

[rosends]

If I didn't define it then how can you decide it's distinct from something? This is called logic or in your case an absence thereof.

You said the thesis based on one concept was different from the thesis based on another concept in post 20. You decided it was different, not I. Pay attention.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You said the thesis based on one concept was different from the thesis based on another concept in post 20. You decided it was different, not I. Pay attention.

The only things I differentiated in post #20 were:

Well the thesis "Islam is a religion of violence" is a different thesis to "Islamic terrorism has been around since 600AD".

We were talking about the latter and the sources I used in support of my position support the view that Islamic terrorism is quite new, starting around mid 20th century.

Islam is not a "religion of violence" any more than Christianity or Judaism - that's where you came unstuck.

 

[Deadstick]

So no condemnation of human shields then, very well so human shields are OK after all? funny thing is it's the Israelis who complain about this. Many Zionists here are always shouting "human shields" as if it was a bad thing...

Your avatar too, is William Wallace - a man regarded as a terrorist by the English, sought to liberate his people from foreign occupation - did you not know that or are you just that stupid?

They can use it as a defence at their war crimes trials but i doubt it will help.

 

[rosends]

The only things I differentiated in post #20 were:

Do then I'll just ask for a clarification because of my own densrnrss: what distinguishes between violence and terrorism. If it would be easier simply to define terrorism then that would also be helpful.

Islam is not a "religion of violence" any more than Christianity or Judaism - that's where you came unstuck.

So you reacted to the title of the page instead of the content and how it supported a different point. Got it.