They Come Back

The pure hearted residents of Martha's Vineyard were so anxious to virtue signal their kindness to criminals they never thought they were really advertising their vulnerability to every criminal looking for a safe place to victimize.

Welcome to the rest of the world.
Did the guns make it out safety?

I need to know that their safe.
 
The pure hearted residents of Martha's Vineyard were so anxious to virtue signal their kindness to criminals they never thought they were really advertising their vulnerability to every criminal looking for a safe place to victimize.

Welcome to the rest of the world.

I love it! Snotty leftist phonies getting butt fucked by those they supported, until the rubber actually hit the road, is a SHITLOAD OF FUN!


.
 
Last edited:
A link related to THIS story please.

I said what I said. It applies to all of their stories. Once a liar always a liar. If you want me to read something, find a source other than one that admits to lying to push stories.
 
I said what I said. It applies to all of their stories. Once a liar always a liar. If you want me to read something, find a source other than one that admits to lying to push stories.

I don't personally use AmericanThinker as a source nor msnbc nor cnn nor ABC.

That said, you do realize that Leftist "Fact-checkers" will always say conservatives sources are biased and false (for the most part)
And Right wing sources likely do the same.

Do you consider any media sources "trustworthy" ?
 
You do realize that Leftist "Fact-checkers" will always say conservatives sources are biased and false (for the most part)
And Right wing sources likely do the same.

Do you consider any media sources "trustworthy" ?

I guess you didn't bother to read the link.

Retraction
 
I guess you didn't bother to read the link.

Retraction

I did. And as I said, one mistake does not a history make. Common sense.
They explained they relied on bad sources.

I guess you could not comprehend my question.

Again.....

Do you consider any media sources "trustworthy" ?

And if not, it would be interesting to know how you draw your conclusions.
 
I guess you could not comprehend the question.

Again.....

Do you consider any media sources "trustworthy" ?

And if not, it would be interesting to know how you draw your conclusions.

I consider media sources that admit to lying as untrustworthy.
 
I consider media sources that admit to lying as untrustworthy.

You're circle jerking.

READ the article. They explain how it happened.
Not defending them, just saying that an experiment based on ONE sample is flawed.

Maybe you have other examples of them caught lying?
You seem to know a lot about them.

Also, you clearly avoid naming any sources you trust.
 

Forum List

Back
Top