There Is A Real Downside To Abortion

[PoliticalChic]

And, no, I'm not wishing it on anybody, simply reporting.


1. Journal of Psychiatric Research
Volume 187, July 2025, Pages 304-310

Induced abortion and implications for long-term mental health: a cohort study of 1.2 million pregnancies​

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625003309?via%3Dihub

2. "...researchers found that women who have abortions are more than twice as likely to end up hospitalized for psychiatric problems compared to women who carry their pregnancies to term. This isn’t some fringe finding; it’s based on a massive study tracking over 1.2 million pregnancies for up to 17 years. The numbers don’t lie: for every 10,000 person-years, 104 women who aborted ended up hospitalized for serious mental health issues like psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, and suicide attempts, while only 42 women who gave birth faced the same fate.



3. ... the risk spikes with repeated abortions.
Women who had more than one abortion saw an even higher chance of mental health crises that required hospitalization..... this risk hangs heavy for at least five years after the procedure. This kind of clear connection between abortion and mental health isn’t new either. A 2023 study using Medicaid data found that women who had an abortion during their first pregnancy were significantly more likely to need inpatient mental health treatment afterward than those who instead chose to give birth.



4..... why? And the answer seems obvious. While the pro abortion movement insists there’s no moral or ethical issue in terminating a pregnancy because it’s “just a bunch of cells,” deep down, I think they all know better, and the weight of the actions of women who have abortions weighs heavier on them than they realize. This new study makes it impossible to ignore the grim aftermath so many women face. We’re not just talking about fleeting emotions here, but deep psychological scars, depression, regret, and in some cases, a lifetime of pain that never fully goes away.



5.....that helps explain why so many liberal women seem completely detached from reality. We see them on TikTok, parading their abortions like badges of honor, or screaming in the streets about “bodily autonomy” as if the child inside them is just an inconvenient lump of cells. But scratch beneath the surface of that bravado, and you find a movement that is trying desperately to cover up the guilt, trauma, and regret with empty slogans and angry theatrics. It makes them look a little unhinged because deep down, they know the truth they’ve been denying."

This Must Be Why Liberal Women Are Bonkers

A study reveals the mental health risks of abortion among women, shedding light on liberal women's behavior.

pjmedia.com

Abortion, murder, is simply one more of the myriad lies the Left tells.

 

[Hafar1014]

And, no, I'm not wishing it on anybody, simply reporting.


1. Journal of Psychiatric Research
Volume 187, July 2025, Pages 304-310

Induced abortion and implications for long-term mental health: a cohort study of 1.2 million pregnancies​

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625003309?via%3Dihub

2. "...researchers found that women who have abortions are more than twice as likely to end up hospitalized for psychiatric problems compared to women who carry their pregnancies to term. This isn’t some fringe finding; it’s based on a massive study tracking over 1.2 million pregnancies for up to 17 years. The numbers don’t lie: for every 10,000 person-years, 104 women who aborted ended up hospitalized for serious mental health issues like psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, and suicide attempts, while only 42 women who gave birth faced the same fate.



3. ... the risk spikes with repeated abortions.
Women who had more than one abortion saw an even higher chance of mental health crises that required hospitalization..... this risk hangs heavy for at least five years after the procedure. This kind of clear connection between abortion and mental health isn’t new either. A 2023 study using Medicaid data found that women who had an abortion during their first pregnancy were significantly more likely to need inpatient mental health treatment afterward than those who instead chose to give birth.



4..... why? And the answer seems obvious. While the pro abortion movement insists there’s no moral or ethical issue in terminating a pregnancy because it’s “just a bunch of cells,” deep down, I think they all know better, and the weight of the actions of women who have abortions weighs heavier on them than they realize. This new study makes it impossible to ignore the grim aftermath so many women face. We’re not just talking about fleeting emotions here, but deep psychological scars, depression, regret, and in some cases, a lifetime of pain that never fully goes away.



5.....that helps explain why so many liberal women seem completely detached from reality. We see them on TikTok, parading their abortions like badges of honor, or screaming in the streets about “bodily autonomy” as if the child inside them is just an inconvenient lump of cells. But scratch beneath the surface of that bravado, and you find a movement that is trying desperately to cover up the guilt, trauma, and regret with empty slogans and angry theatrics. It makes them look a little unhinged because deep down, they know the truth they’ve been denying."

This Must Be Why Liberal Women Are Bonkers

A study reveals the mental health risks of abortion among women, shedding light on liberal women's behavior.

pjmedia.com

ccs
Abortion, murder, is simply one more of the myriad lies the Left tells.

There are situations when abortion is necessary. A fetus with Tay Sacs Disease, anencephaly, mother has cancer and chemo will kill the fetus. Then we have rape and incest. Thats must be by choice.
Your data doesn't distinguish between preexisting emotional problems.

If we force a birth then there is an adoption both baby and mother will experience a life long trauma.

The emotional problems are the result of hormones to a great degree.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There are situations when abortion is necessary. A fetus with Tay Sacs Disease, anencephaly, mother has cancer and chemo will kill the fetus. Then we have rape and incest. Thats must be by choice.
Your data doesn't distinguish between preexisting emotional problems.

If we force a birth then there is an adoption both baby and mother will experience a life long trauma.

The emotional problems are the result of hormones to a great degree.

Rarely, and certainly NOT in the vast majority of abortions, which are no more than late birth control.

Please try to keep things in perspective.


AI Overview

According to the Guttmacher Institute, an estimated 1,038,000 abortions were provided in the United States in 2024. This represents a slight increase from 2023, when there were approximately 1,050,000 abortions.




The point: there is a psychological penalty for abortion.

 

[toobfreak]

There Is A Real Downside To Abortion​

The obvious downside is not being able to tell if the fetus would after growing up, be a supporter of abortion. After all, what pro-choice supporter could object to themselves being aborted as a fetus and having their own choices savagely taken away if they are willing to do it to others?

...researchers found that women who have abortions are more than twice as likely to end up hospitalized for psychiatric problems

And who could really be surprised by that? I'm not saying the abortions CAUSE the mental problems, I'm suggesting the mental problems are what lead to the unwanted pregnancies and abortions in the first place.

compared to women who carry their pregnancies to term.

Just as nothing could lead to a more sanguine, secure satisfaction than planning for a family, then having and raising your own children.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The obvious downside is not being able to tell if the fetus would after growing up, be a supporter of abortion. After all, what pro-choice supporter could object to themselves being aborted as a fetus and having their own choices savagely taken away if they are willing to do it to others?


And who could really be surprised by that? I'm not saying the abortions CAUSE the mental problems, I'm suggesting the mental problems are what lead to the unwanted pregnancies and abortions in the first place.


Just as nothing could lead to a more sanguine, secure satisfaction than planning for a family, then having and raising your own children.

Seems we're in agreement.

 

[The Duke]

And, no, I'm not wishing it on anybody, simply reporting.


1. Journal of Psychiatric Research
Volume 187, July 2025, Pages 304-310

Induced abortion and implications for long-term mental health: a cohort study of 1.2 million pregnancies​

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625003309?via%3Dihub

2. "...researchers found that women who have abortions are more than twice as likely to end up hospitalized for psychiatric problems compared to women who carry their pregnancies to term. This isn’t some fringe finding; it’s based on a massive study tracking over 1.2 million pregnancies for up to 17 years. The numbers don’t lie: for every 10,000 person-years, 104 wohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OcMksVqNA0men who aborted ended up hospitalized for serious mental health issues like psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, and suicide attempts, while only 42 women who gave birth faced the same fate.



3. ... the risk spikes with repeated abortions.
Women who had more than one abortion saw an even higher chance of mental health crises that required hospitalization..... this risk hangs heavy for at least five years after the procedure. This kind of clear connection between abortion and mental health isn’t new either. A 2023 study using Medicaid data found that women who had an abortion during their first pregnancy were significantly more likely to need inpatient mental health treatment afterward than those who instead chose to give birth.



4..... why? And the answer seems obvious. While the pro abortion movement insists there’s no moral or ethical issue in terminating a pregnancy because it’s “just a bunch of cells,” deep down, I think they all know better, and the weight of the actions of women who have abortions weighs heavier on them than they realize. This new study makes it impossible to ignore the grim aftermath so many women face. We’re not just talking about fleeting emotions here, but deep psychological scars, depression, regret, and in some cases, a lifetime of pain that never fully goes away.



5.....that helps explain why so many liberal women seem completely detached from reality. We see them on TikTok, parading their abortions like badges of honor, or screaming in the streets about “bodily autonomy” as if the child inside them is just an inconvenient lump of cells. But scratch beneath the surface of that bravado, and you find a movement that is trying desperately to cover up the guilt, trauma, and regret with empty slogans and angry theatrics. It makes them look a little unhinged because deep down, they know the truth they’ve been denying."

This Must Be Why Liberal Women Are Bonkers

A study reveals the mental health risks of abortion among women, shedding light on liberal women's behavior.

pjmedia.com

Abortion, murder, is simply one more of the myriad lies the Left tells.

Extinguishing the spark of innocent life is evil.

 

[toobfreak]

Extinguishing the spark of innocent life is evil.

I've heard of this before and I'd like to know more about that. It sounds like some sort of bio-electric energy.

If I were a pure theist, I might even speculate this was the soul entering the zygote.

But since no one can probably say for sure with absolute authority, I would suggest we owe the fetus the benefit of the doubt.

 

[The Duke]

I've heard of this before and I'd like to know more about that. It sounds like some sort of bio-electric energy.

If I were a pure theist, I might even speculate this was the soul entering the zygote.

But since no one can probably say for sure with absolute authority, I would suggest we owe the fetus the benefit of the doubt.

I would posit the same as well.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Cause and effect.
Does abortion cause mental health and emotional problems? Are women with emotional problems, substance abuse, or mental health issues likely to have unplanned pregnancies.

Women in sensitive states are better off with an abortion rather than adoption. The threat of exposure will hang over them for the rest of their lives.

 

[Trickster]

You anti-abortionists absolutely suck. You offer no sound arguments and always rely on emotionalism. This is no exception.

You do not care about the women and by pretending you do you are lying to yourself.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You anti-abortionists absolutely suck. You offer no sound arguments and always rely on emotionalism. This is no exception.

You do not care about the women and by pretending you do you are lying to yourself.

Let's check:

How about handcuffs? That make two people one?


Of course it is a separate being.
Did you want to explain the different fingerprints? DNA? Blood types?



And this: In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.


Makes you look like a dope, doesn't it?

 

[Trickster]

Let's check:

How about handcuffs? That make two people one?

This analogy makes no sense.

Of course it is a separate being.
Did you want to explain the different fingerprints? DNA? Blood types?

Corpses have unique fingerprints, DNA and blood too - do they have rights?

Ridiculous.

And this: In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.

Congrats, you know maths, but your understanding for rights and concepts is very poor.

"unborn child" is an anti-concept. It is a reference to nothing and just something anti-abortipnists use to appeal to emotion. Your great-great-great-great-great-great-grandchildren are "unborn children" too -- do they have rights?

You are an "undead corpse" - should we take away your righta?

Makes you look like a dope, doesn't it?

Lmao.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This analogy makes no sense.

Corpses have unique fingerprints, DNA and blood too - do they have rights?

Ridiculous.

Congrats, you know maths, but your understanding for rights and concepts is very poor.

"unborn child" is an anti-concept. It is a reference to nothing and just something anti-abortipnists use to appeal to emotion. Your great-great-great-great-great-great-grandchildren are "unborn children" too -- do they have rights?

You are an "undead corpse" - should we take away your righta?

Lmao.

Since the actuality of murder is not a consideration to one of your views, the science doesn't seem to be either.


That's a misunderstanding of biology.....the individual being put to death for nothing more than convenience, is not her body.


The unborn human receiving sustenance from its mother, is, nonetheless, a separate and distinct human being.

There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.
2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.
3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.
4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1
5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.
6. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
7. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).
8. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.
9. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"

Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

1. The late Christopher Hitchens, a prominent public intellectual, atheist, and abortion advocate wrote the following in his book, God is Not Great:

As a materialist, I think it has been demonstrated that an embryo is a separate body and entity, and not merely (as some really did used to argue) a growth on or in the female body. There used to be feminists who would say that it was more like an appendix or even—this was seriously maintained—a tumor. That nonsense seems to have stopped… Embryology confirms morality. The words “unborn child,” even when used in a politicized manner, describe a material reality.3

Hitchens had other reasons for supporting legal abortion, but he recognized the absurdity of claiming that unborn children are simply part of the mother's body.

No matter how you spin it, women don't have four arms and four legs when they're pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother's body.

Footnotes

1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You anti-abortionists absolutely suck. You offer no sound arguments and always rely on emotionalism. This is no exception.

You do not care about the women and by pretending you do you are lying to yourself.

Ignorant of history and morality, you fail to recognize that you echo every Bolshevik principle:

“"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

 

[Trickster]

Since the actuality of murder is not a consideration to one of your views, the science doesn't seem to be either.

Murder applies only to human beings. A ZEF is only a potential human being and thus does not have any rights.

That's a misunderstanding of biology.....the individual being put to death for nothing more than convenience, is not her body.


The unborn human receiving sustenance from its mother, is, nonetheless, a separate and distinct human being.

Are you seriously going to argue a zygote is a human being? You are not serious. Also, the ZEF is by definition not a separate being. It is attached to, lives in- and off of the pregnant woman.

Anti-abortionists do nlt understand words and certainly do not understand concepts nor do they understand rights.

you are all emotions.

There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.

What the heck is an "unborn child"? Stop using anti-concepts.

1. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.

Bloodtype has no relation to rights, so no idea why you are going vampire mode here.

1. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.

And?

1. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1

This has nothing to do with rights either.

1. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.

In no context can the rights of to individuals be in conflict. My right to life does not conflict with ypur right to liberty. A ZEF has no rights.

1. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.

Still no mention of rights. Geez. I bet this post contains zero mentions of that word. But, you might surprise me.

1. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).

It is not yet a human being.

1. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.

Yeah because the woman owns her body, her life and her decisions. The standard of value is the woman. Only she has the right to terminate her pregnancy.

1. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"

Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

What an idiot.

1. The late Christopher Hitchens, a prominent public intellectual, atheist, and abortion advocate wrote the following in his book, God is Not Great:

As a materialist, I think it has been demonstrated that an embryo is a separate body and entity, and not merely (as some really did used to argue) a growth on or in the female body. There used to be feminists who would say that it was more like an appendix or even—this was seriously maintained—a tumor. That nonsense seems to have stopped… Embryology confirms morality. The words “unborn child,” even when used in a politicized manner, describe a material reality.3

Yeah, he is fundamentally wrong. The term "unborn child" is a self-contradiction (umborn = anyone who does not exist, child = existing, born, young human offspring. As I said before it is like calling a newborn an "undead corpse".

Hitchens had other reasons for supporting legal abortion, but he recognized the absurdity of claiming that unborn children are simply part of the mother's body.

He was clearly wrong then.

No matter how you spin it, women don't have four arms and four legs when they're pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother's body.

OK and a pregnant woman has as many limbs she had before pregnancy, but limbs is not what gives us rights.

Footnotes

1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.

Cute.

 

[Trickster]

Ignorant of history and morality, you fail to recognize that you echo every Bolshevik principle:

“"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

Whether you like it or not women have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit if happiness.

Abortion is a moral right.

But, anti-abortionists clearly lack the capacity to present actual argu,ents and to address those of others. I will not engage with you scumbags anymore.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Murder applies only to human beings. A ZEF is only a potential human being and thus does not have any rights.

Are you seriously going to argue a zygote is a human being? You are not serious. Also, the ZEF is by definition not a separate being. It is attached to, lives in- and off of the pregnant woman.

Anti-abortionists do nlt understand words and certainly do not understand concepts nor do they understand rights.

you are all emotions.

What the heck is an "unborn child"? Stop using anti-concepts.

Bloodtype has no relation to rights, so no idea why you are going vampire mode here.

And?

This has nothing to do with rights either.

In no context can the rights of to individuals be in conflict. My right to life does not conflict with ypur right to liberty. A ZEF has no rights.

Still no mention of rights. Geez. I bet this post contains zero mentions of that word. But, you might surprise me.

It is not yet a human being.

Yeah because the woman owns her body, her life and her decisions. The standard of value is the woman. Only she has the right to terminate her pregnancy.

What an idiot.

Yeah, he is fundamentally wrong. The term "unborn child" is a self-contradiction (umborn = anyone who does not exist, child = existing, born, young human offspring. As I said before it is like calling a newborn an "undead corpse".

He was clearly wrong then.

OK and a pregnant woman has as many limbs she had before pregnancy, but limbs is not what gives us rights.

Cute.

"Are you seriously going to argue a zygote is a human being? "



The zygote is formed when male and female gametes join, producing a unique genetic code.

Yes, that is a human being, and it would go on to look you in the eye and demand to know why you wished to slaughter it, if you didn't demand to kill it.


Your posts are important as they verify what we on the Right have said about you pagans.

 

[the watcher]

And, no, I'm not wishing it on anybody, simply reporting.


1. Journal of Psychiatric Research
Volume 187, July 2025, Pages 304-310

Induced abortion and implications for long-term mental health: a cohort study of 1.2 million pregnancies​

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625003309?via%3Dihub

2. "...researchers found that women who have abortions are more than twice as likely to end up hospitalized for psychiatric problems compared to women who carry their pregnancies to term. This isn’t some fringe finding; it’s based on a massive study tracking over 1.2 million pregnancies for up to 17 years. The numbers don’t lie: for every 10,000 person-years, 104 women who aborted ended up hospitalized for serious mental health issues like psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, and suicide attempts, while only 42 women who gave birth faced the same fate.



3. ... the risk spikes with repeated abortions.
Women who had more than one abortion saw an even higher chance of mental health crises that required hospitalization..... this risk hangs heavy for at least five years after the procedure. This kind of clear connection between abortion and mental health isn’t new either. A 2023 study using Medicaid data found that women who had an abortion during their first pregnancy were significantly more likely to need inpatient mental health treatment afterward than those who instead chose to give birth.



4..... why? And the answer seems obvious. While the pro abortion movement insists there’s no moral or ethical issue in terminating a pregnancy because it’s “just a bunch of cells,” deep down, I think they all know better, and the weight of the actions of women who have abortions weighs heavier on them than they realize. This new study makes it impossible to ignore the grim aftermath so many women face. We’re not just talking about fleeting emotions here, but deep psychological scars, depression, regret, and in some cases, a lifetime of pain that never fully goes away.



5.....that helps explain why so many liberal women seem completely detached from reality. We see them on TikTok, parading their abortions like badges of honor, or screaming in the streets about “bodily autonomy” as if the child inside them is just an inconvenient lump of cells. But scratch beneath the surface of that bravado, and you find a movement that is trying desperately to cover up the guilt, trauma, and regret with empty slogans and angry theatrics. It makes them look a little unhinged because deep down, they know the truth they’ve been denying."

This Must Be Why Liberal Women Are Bonkers

A study reveals the mental health risks of abortion among women, shedding light on liberal women's behavior.

pjmedia.com

Abortion, murder, is simply one more of the myriad lies the Left tells.

It doesn't seem to do the baby much good either.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Whether you like it or not women have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit if happiness.

Abortion is a moral right.

But, anti-abortionists clearly lack the capacity to present actual argu,ents and to address those of others. I will not engage with you scumbags anymore.

"Whether you like it or not women have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit if happiness."

As does the new human being that she participated in allowing to be created.



I provided moral, scientific and historic evidence that describes the pagan that you are.


What does being pagan mean?


AI Overview

To be Pagan generally means to follow a spiritual path that is not part of the mainstream Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam), often involving the worship of nature, deities, or ancestral traditions, and can be used self-referentially by adherents to describe their polytheistic or nature-based beliefs and practices.


Here is your religion:

For the Democrats, Liberals, Communists, Nazis, Fascists.....Militant Secularism. Lacking self-awareness, the Democrats, Liberals, Progressives ridicule religion as superstition......but kneel to their false religion, Militant Secularism.
From the Amazon review of Godless, by Coulter…


Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, it bears all the attributes of a religion. In Godless, Coulter throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us its sacraments (abortion), its holy writ (Roe v. Wade), its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal), its clergy (public school teachers), its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free), its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland), and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident).

Then, of course, there's the liberal creation myth: Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.



Here we can watch their religious service:

 

[Leo123]

You anti-abortionists absolutely suck. You offer no sound arguments and always rely on emotionalism. This is no exception.

You do not care about the women and by pretending you do you are lying to yourself.

Women control sex and they are giving it away to men who only want a warm place to put their penis.