There is a provision in the CR that requires House members to be advised by companies such as Google, X, etc., if they get a grand jury subpoena ...

[excalibur]

This is outrageous! They would declare themselves completely above the law. Able to break any law, and get subpoenas quashed.

While the instant purpose is to protect the criminality of Schiff and Swalwell, who a grand jury believes gave classified information to the media, and to protect the illegtitimate J6 committee, it would allow complete lawlessness by any member of Congress, including retroactively.

There is a provision in the CR that requires House members to be advised by companies such as Google, X, etc., if they get a grand jury subpoena for records of members, and gives them the power to quash such subpoenas.

The provision includes language that it depended Ed or preempts and statute [sic], court rule or regulation to the contrary.

This is to block any investigation of the J6 Comm or other Congressional committees or members.​

 

[White 6]

This is outrageous! They would declare themselves completely above the law. Able to break any law, and get subpoenas quashed.

While the instant purpose is to protect the criminality of Schiff and Swalwell, who a grand jury believes gave classified information to the media, and to protect the illegtitimate J6 committee, it would allow complete lawlessness by any member of Congress, including retroactively.

There is a provision in the CR that requires House members to be advised by companies such as Google, X, etc., if they get a grand jury subpoena for records of members, and gives them the power to quash such subpoenas. ​

​

The provision includes language that it depended Ed or preempts and statute [sic], court rule or regulation to the contrary. ​

​

This is to block any investigation of the J6 Comm or other Congressional committees or members.​

Do you have a link to the CR or just the shipwreck X poster?

 

[progressive hunter]

 

[1srelluc]

Do you have a link to the CR or just the shipwreck X poster?

It's GTG as a linked source, show me in the rules where it isn't.

 

[excalibur]

Do you have a link to the CR or just the shipwreck X poster?

The man is a former AUSA having served 22 years in that position.

 

[White 6]

It's GTG as a linked source, show me in the rules where it isn't.

Not looking for a rule, as have no problem with it being here. Looking for the CR, to know what it says.

 

[1srelluc]

Not looking for a rule, as have no problem with it being here. Looking for the CR, to know what it says.

I found something from The Hill but it's one cluster fuck of an article.....Must be two pages long and never makes a point.

 

[progressive hunter]

Not looking for a rule, as have no problem with it being here. Looking for the CR, to know what it says.

thats because youre not smart enough to look it up yourself,,

everytime you dumb fucks try and attack the messenger instead of addressing the message you look like idiots,, as you do right now,,

I even posted a video where he pulled it up on screen so you can read it,,

but again youre to stupid to look at it,,

 

[White 6]

The man is a former AUSA having served 22 years in that position.

So, I should trust without reference? Why?

 

[progressive hunter]

So, I should trust without reference? Why?

youre a sad human being,,

 

[White 6]

I found something from The Hill but it's one cluster fuck of an article.....Must be two pages long and never makes a point.

I haven't even accessed that. Unusual for me not to be able to look something up.

 

[White 6]

thats because youre not smart enough to look it up yourself,,

everytime you dumb fucks try and attack the messenger instead of addressing the message you look like idiots,, as you do right now,,

I even posted a video where he pulled it up on screen so you can read it,,

but again youre to stupid to look at it,,

Fuck you, dumb ass. I still like to see real documents for validity, unlike you, who will believe anything, if some internet guy shows you a video.

 

[progressive hunter]

Fuck you, dumb ass. I still like to see real documents for validity, unlike you, who will believe anything, if some internet guy shows you a video.

before meeting you I have never seen someone so proud of their ignorance,,

you should be so proud,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Fuck you, dumb ass. I still like to see real documents for validity, unlike you, who will believe anything, if some internet guy shows you a video.

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrFcrW3O2NnkAIAWx9XNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNiZjEEcG9zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1735766199/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.axios.com%2fpro%2fenergy-policy%2f2024%2f12%2f18%2fcr-text-released/RK=2/RS=Kbdj7oWH3yiGPLzCQnmksMyPnM4-

 

[progressive hunter]

White 6

OK so you disagree with being proud of your ignorance,,

thats progress,,

ignorance is nothing to be proud of,, but only you can correct that,,

 

[1srelluc]

I haven't even accessed that. Unusual for me not to be able to look something up.

I kept looking for a "was this article helpful" button to click and let them have it.

 

[Doc7505]

This is outrageous! They would declare themselves completely above the law. Able to break any law, and get subpoenas quashed.

While the instant purpose is to protect the criminality of Schiff and Swalwell, who a grand jury believes gave classified information to the media, and to protect the illegtitimate J6 committee, it would allow complete lawlessness by any member of Congress, including retroactively.

There is a provision in the CR that requires House members to be advised by companies such as Google, X, etc., if they get a grand jury subpoena for records of members, and gives them the power to quash such subpoenas. ​

​

The provision includes language that it depended Ed or preempts and statute [sic], court rule or regulation to the contrary. ​

​

This is to block any investigation of the J6 Comm or other Congressional committees or members.​

~~~~~~
Just another reason to kill this Bill....