The WSJ does not appear to be intimidated.

Trump: I will release the Epstein files!
Bondi: Sir, you’re all over them
Trump: There are no Epstein files
MAGA: wut?
Trump: Obama is a crook, coke needs sugar, damn the paper straws!

Exactly!
 
What happened? I thought the WSJ was the official maga cult newspaper.
 
Why is He in the files?

Just my personal opinion, but I don't think MAGA supporters really care if Trump's name is in the files per se. I think they know Trump is a man-whore with some pervy tendencies. They accepted that long ago.

But even they have lines that can't be crossed. Trump's strengths is that he's self-aware when it comes to his branding and the branding of his image. He knows 'his people'. He knows what turns them on and what would turn them off. My 'spidey' senses tell me he's really afraid that whatever's in those files is going to imprint an image in the minds of his supporters they'll never be able to erase.

I suspect they will quite selectively release redacted files at some point. They can't just alter files in whatever way they want, though -- not legally anyway. Records laws are a thing.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JLW
You seem to have the order of things reversed. But then, you were ordered to lie that way, so it's not like you had a choice. Cultists have to obey.

Also, Gabbard is a known Russia asset. Anyone believing here is echoing orders from Moscow. Only the most vile traitors would do that, thus the Trump cultists do it.

Known Russian asset. Too funny.
 

Dems accuse Trump of coverup after WSJ reports he was told he was in Epstein files​

Democrats are continuing their attacks on President Donald Trump after The Wall Street Journal published a new story about the Trump administration’s handling of the investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed Trump in May that his name appears multiple times in files related to the federal investigation into Epstein, including instances of hearsay about Trump previously socializing with Epstein, who died by suicide in jail in 2019.


Attempts to silence the media don't seem to be working. What's next, sue them for a trillion dollars?
LOL. If you are going to "report" shit like that then you should be showing the evidence up front and not concealing it. The media have reported enough shit that they never provide proof of. It's about time they were called out on it and paid a price for it.
 
The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed Trump in May

Details of the president reportedly being briefed by DOJ about the Epstein investigation sent Democrats into attack mode.
What are the chances that Trumps DoJ and FBI are fabricating evidence against Obama? I'd say it's pretty high, considering the whole Epstein issue.
Explain why Clapper admitted lawyering up on Kaitlin Collins show last night.
 
LOL. If you are going to "report" shit like that then you should be showing the evidence up front and not concealing it. The media have reported enough shit that they never provide proof of. It's about time they were called out on it and paid a price for it.

Laughable. When you show evidence, we will start listening to you. Get to skippy.
 
15th post

Dems accuse Trump of coverup after WSJ reports he was told he was in Epstein files​

Democrats are continuing their attacks on President Donald Trump after The Wall Street Journal published a new story about the Trump administration’s handling of the investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed Trump in May that his name appears multiple times in files related to the federal investigation into Epstein, including instances of hearsay about Trump previously socializing with Epstein, who died by suicide in jail in 2019.


Attempts to silence the media don't seem to be working. What's next, sue them for a trillion dollars?
The Journal is just one of those in the big club. The media is not fair and/or objective as much as it is politically motivated today. Yet you would call it free speech. The FCC needs to bring rules back into TV and have newspapers/magazines show proof. Real proof unlike now where apologies show up months later after the damage is done.
 

Dems accuse Trump of coverup after WSJ reports he was told he was in Epstein files​

Democrats are continuing their attacks on President Donald Trump after The Wall Street Journal published a new story about the Trump administration’s handling of the investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed Trump in May that his name appears multiple times in files related to the federal investigation into Epstein, including instances of hearsay about Trump previously socializing with Epstein, who died by suicide in jail in 2019.


Attempts to silence the media don't seem to be working. What's next, sue them for a trillion dollars?
The investigation into Epstein was conducted years and ago and was concluded when he was indicted

What a weird post
 
See the kids are back in action again --- MadTeeth and Horsey Horse .
It's odd, how this Russian troll wants to make every topic about her support of Russonazis committing genocide.

She never tries to justify the RussoNazi invasion. She just loveslovesloves those RussoNazis, and she gets so upset at anyone who opposes RussoNazis.

I think she's most upset because Trump isn't dancing on Putin's puppet strings like he used to. That's the problem with making an ally of a senile man. Trump can't remember that Russia pays him off.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom