Fascism is probably the most over-used go-to attacks/ labels as of late.
One doesn't have to search very deep to find hundreds, if not thousands of examples of the left using the word "Fascist" or "fascism" to attack Trump and/ or his "MAGA" supporters.
But it's a projection on their part.
One of the most basic identifiers of fascism is the denial of basic human rights and the recognition of all human beings as equally deserving of basic human rights and protections.
Consider this Q&A I had with AI (Co Pilot and Grok.)
I have two examples of social-political positions that I have observed.
1. 'All human beings are persons and should be recognized as persons from the very earliest moment that a human being's life can be scientifically determined (conception).'
2. 'A human being is not a human being, a child is not a child, nor worthy of personhood , recognition, or legal protection, unless and until they live long enough and develop past some arbitrarily decided point (sentience, sapience, ability to breathe, etc.) - a point of development where after, their basic human rights can't be denied any longer.'
Briefly, can you explain which of those two views is most in line with a fascist's mindset and why?
Co Pilot's response
One doesn't have to search very deep to find hundreds, if not thousands of examples of the left using the word "Fascist" or "fascism" to attack Trump and/ or his "MAGA" supporters.
But it's a projection on their part.
One of the most basic identifiers of fascism is the denial of basic human rights and the recognition of all human beings as equally deserving of basic human rights and protections.
Consider this Q&A I had with AI (Co Pilot and Grok.)
I have two examples of social-political positions that I have observed.
1. 'All human beings are persons and should be recognized as persons from the very earliest moment that a human being's life can be scientifically determined (conception).'
2. 'A human being is not a human being, a child is not a child, nor worthy of personhood , recognition, or legal protection, unless and until they live long enough and develop past some arbitrarily decided point (sentience, sapience, ability to breathe, etc.) - a point of development where after, their basic human rights can't be denied any longer.'
Briefly, can you explain which of those two views is most in line with a fascist's mindset and why?
Co Pilot's response
