The Word "Fascism" and its over-use as an attack on Conservatives.

When the Pro-Abort Left accuses Trump and Conservatives of being fascists, they are Projecting.

  • 2. False - Denying personhood and basic human rights to those human beings is not "fascist"

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1

Chuz Life

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
12,792
Reaction score
6,512
Points
1,050
Location
USA
Fascism is probably the most over-used go-to attacks/ labels as of late.

One doesn't have to search very deep to find hundreds, if not thousands of examples of the left using the word "Fascist" or "fascism" to attack Trump and/ or his "MAGA" supporters.

But it's a projection on their part.

One of the most basic identifiers of fascism is the denial of basic human rights and the recognition of all human beings as equally deserving of basic human rights and protections.

Consider this Q&A I had with AI (Co Pilot and Grok.)

I have two examples of social-political positions that I have observed.

1. 'All human beings are persons and should be recognized as persons from the very earliest moment that a human being's life can be scientifically determined (conception).'

2. 'A human being is not a human being, a child is not a child, nor worthy of personhood , recognition, or legal protection, unless and until they live long enough and develop past some arbitrarily decided point (sentience, sapience, ability to breathe, etc.) - a point of development where after, their basic human rights can't be denied any longer.'

Briefly, can you explain which of those two views is most in line with a fascist's mindset and why?

Co Pilot's response
1754513049952.webp
 
It is not overused on right wingers. You guys whine that everything describing your behavior is overused. What's overused is the fascist ideology/behavior you guys believe and support.

Everything co pilot describes is what you right wingers believe.
 
If the Constitution serves to legally protect the right to life, the question arises “when does the life of a person begin?” Unfortunately, the Constitution speaks in terms of persons and of citizens.

Scientifically we already know that life does indeed begin on conception. “Personhood” may or may not require being born.

But that’s different than the underlying question of when a human life begins. It absolutely begins upon conception.

See: When Human Life Begins - American College of Pediatricians
 
If the Constitution serves to legally protect the right to life, the question arises “when does the life of a person begin?” Unfortunately, the Constitution speaks in terms of persons and of citizens.

Scientifically we already know that life does indeed begin on conception. “Personhood” may or may not require being born.

But that’s different than the underlying question of when a human life begins. It absolutely begins upon conception.

See: When Human Life Begins - American College of Pediatricians
This thread is about the ideological aspects.

Which approach towards the answer to the points that you are making are more in line with fascism and which ideology is more in kune with natural law and even progressivism?

The one that is inclusive and does not seek to discard or disqualify any human beings based on their only temporary level of development?

Or the one that so narrowly defines a "person" as to exclude certain human beings for the convenience of others?

Which view or approach is more in line with fascism?
 
It is not overused on right wingers. You guys whine that everything describing your behavior is overused. What's overused is the fascist ideology/behavior you guys believe and support.

Everything co pilot describes is what you right wingers believe.
Ok, "Macaca" you don't seem to have any "gravitas" on this matter. "You are no Jack Kennedy."
 
This thread is about the ideological aspects.

Which approach towards the answer to the points that you are making are more in line with fascism and which ideology is more in kune with natural law and even progressivism?

The one that is inclusive and does not seek to discard or disqualify any human beings based on their only temporary level of development?

Or the one that so narrowly defines a "person" as to exclude certain human beings for the convenience of others?

Which view or approach is more in line with fascism?
Well, if we (meaning reasonable people) look back in horror at what the Nazis did and can’t believe how anyone or society could choose to accept such mass slaughter, then I wonder how future people will look “back” on how cavalierly we treated the massive slaughter of helpless completely innocent preborn human lives.
 
The definition of "Fascism" is "government control of the production and distribution of goods and services". It's exactly what Americans endured during the Covid restrictions by doddering old Joe and Dr. Fauci who had no political power. Apparently the crazy TDS left has a concept of authorized Fascism during democrat administrations but they reserve the option to shout "fascist" when they are arrested/
 
The definition of "Fascism" is "government control of the production and distribution of goods and services". It's exactly what Americans endured during the Covid restrictions by doddering old Joe and Dr. Fauci who had no political power. Apparently the crazy TDS left has a concept of authorized Fascism during democrat administrations but they reserve the option to shout "fascist" when they are arrested/
This is noteworthy!
1754525570898.webp
 
 
Back
Top Bottom