The "Wise Latina" Sotomayer muffs it again

[JGalt]

Investigative stop of a vehicle is reasonable if the egistered owner has a revoked drivers license. The opinion written by Clarence Thomas.

8-1 decision. You can guess who the dissenting Justice was.

"The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a Kansas police officer acted lawfully when he stopped a car whose owner’s license was suspended before confirming it was in fact the owner behind the wheel.

In an 8-1 opinion, the justices said the officer’s assumption that the owner was driving was reasonable, given the officer had no reason to think the vehicle was being operated by someone else.

“We hold that when the officer lacks information negating an inference that the owner is the driver of the vehicle, the stop is reasonable,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the majority in a case that pit road safety against drivers’ privacy rights.

The ruling was a defeat for defendant Charles Glover, who had argued the traffic stop violated the Constitution’s ban on unreasonable search and seizure, and could encourage similar police stops across the country, even in cases where someone other than the car’s owner is driving."

Supreme Court sides with police in traffic stop case

 

[MindWars]

and what is so fkd up by law we don't even need a D.L. Some constitutional thingyee.
What else is new the police today are not mayberry RFD any more.

 

[JGalt]

The original case with mugshot of perp:

Re: STATE OF KANSAS v.CHARLES GLOVER

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

One must not discriminate against dudes wearing earrings.

 

[MindWars]

Ever wonder why the courts NEVER want an ex convict or a legal professional in court for lets say Jury duty. -- or the c.v. thye cant vote ...... IT's because when you become informed on either side the system doesn't want that power taken back by the ppl. It's kind of hard to explain on here but thats a tiny gist of it i suppose.

 

[Jitss617]

Another reason we shouldn’t allow Latinos here .. low iq

 

[MindWars]

One must not discriminate against dudes wearing earrings.

Hey now he could get is degree to be a doctor now . they have fast paced online classes for ppl . Yes i'm serious onn the fast track doc. thingyee too lmfao.

 

[MarathonMike]

It shows how screwed up our legal system is when a nonsense case like this makes it all the way to the Supreme Court. How much time and money was wasted on this crap because lower court judges won't do their job?

 

[danielpalos]

Investigative stop of a vehicle is reasonable if the egistered owner has a revoked drivers license. The opinion written by Clarence Thomas.

8-1 decision. You can guess who the dissenting Justice was.

"The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a Kansas police officer acted lawfully when he stopped a car whose owner’s license was suspended before confirming it was in fact the owner behind the wheel.

In an 8-1 opinion, the justices said the officer’s assumption that the owner was driving was reasonable, given the officer had no reason to think the vehicle was being operated by someone else.

“We hold that when the officer lacks information negating an inference that the owner is the driver of the vehicle, the stop is reasonable,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the majority in a case that pit road safety against drivers’ privacy rights.

The ruling was a defeat for defendant Charles Glover, who had argued the traffic stop violated the Constitution’s ban on unreasonable search and seizure, and could encourage similar police stops across the country, even in cases where someone other than the car’s owner is driving."

Supreme Court sides with police in traffic stop case

Equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States could ensure all persons have reasonable recourse to capital to enable participation in our market based economy and pay all fees and fines.

 

[Christ_on_a_croissant]

and what is so fkd up by law we don't even need a D.L. Some constitutional thingyee.
What else is new the police today are not mayberry RFD any more.

Yes, you do need a DL to drive, sov cit, yes, you do

 

[harmonica]

..Sotomayor is a undeniable racist--but gets a pass cause she's not white
..this is a no brainer
TYPICAL of leftists = they LOVE criminals/law breakers

 

[danielpalos]

..Sotomayor is a undeniable racist--but gets a pass cause she's not white
..this is a no brainer
TYPICAL of leftists = they LOVE criminals/law breakers

It is about equality and equal protection of the laws. The People should have recourse to equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States. Capitalism requires that capital circulate for market participation. That can be accomplished via existing legal and physical infrastructure.

 

[harmonica]

..Sotomayor is a undeniable racist--but gets a pass cause she's not white
..this is a no brainer
TYPICAL of leftists = they LOVE criminals/law breakers

It is about equality and equal protection of the laws. The People should have recourse to equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States. Capitalism requires that capital circulate for market participation. That can be accomplished via existing legal and physical infrastructure.

what are you saying? she's not a racist?