CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 160,823
- 87,215
- 2,645
We need principled Democrats to step up and tell Hillar...er, OK I see the problem
The Washington Times says that Hillary Clinton is in a corner on suicide watch
- Thread starter Bassman007
- Start date
We need principled Democrats to step up and tell Hillar...er, OK I see the problem
JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,540
- 2,165
- Banned
- #62
The far right reactionaries start whining because they can't take what they dish out. The accuse everyone else of doing the crap they are doing. And the day will come that Trump will crush them as Hitler crushed the SA.
HenryBHough
Diamond Member
We must bow to Jake's intimate knowledge of Hitler's "best" practices.
Insider knowledge is always better than even the most informed external speculation.
Insider knowledge is always better than even the most informed external speculation.
browsing deer
Silver Member
Goodwyn states when an idiot drags hitler into a conversation, that person is surrendering
From Wiki!
"
There are many corollaries to Godwin's law, some considered more canonical (by being adopted by Godwin himself)[3] than others.[1] For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress.[8] This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's law.
Godwin's law applies especially to inappropriate, inordinate, or hyperbolic comparisons of other situations (or one's opponent) with Nazis – often referred to as "playing the Hitler card". The law and its corollaries would not apply to discussions covering known mainstays of Nazi Germany such as genocide, eugenics, or racial superiority, nor, more debatably, to a discussion of other totalitarian regimes or ideologies,[citation needed] if that was the explicit topic of conversation, because a Nazi comparison in those circumstances may be appropriate, in effect committing the fallacist's fallacy, or inferring that an argument containing a fallacy must necessarily come to incorrect conclusions. Whether it applies to humorous use or references to oneself is open to interpretation, because this would not be a fallacious attack against a debate opponent.
Although falling foul of Godwin's law tends to cause the individual making the comparison to lose his argument or credibility, Godwin's law itself can be abused as a distraction, diversion or even as censorship, fallaciously miscasting an opponent's argument as hyperbole when the comparisons made by the argument are actually appropriate.[9] Similar criticisms of the "law" (or "at least the distorted version which purports to prohibit all comparisons to German crimes") have been made by Glenn Greenwald.[10]
"
From Wiki!
"
There are many corollaries to Godwin's law, some considered more canonical (by being adopted by Godwin himself)[3] than others.[1] For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress.[8] This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's law.
Godwin's law applies especially to inappropriate, inordinate, or hyperbolic comparisons of other situations (or one's opponent) with Nazis – often referred to as "playing the Hitler card". The law and its corollaries would not apply to discussions covering known mainstays of Nazi Germany such as genocide, eugenics, or racial superiority, nor, more debatably, to a discussion of other totalitarian regimes or ideologies,[citation needed] if that was the explicit topic of conversation, because a Nazi comparison in those circumstances may be appropriate, in effect committing the fallacist's fallacy, or inferring that an argument containing a fallacy must necessarily come to incorrect conclusions. Whether it applies to humorous use or references to oneself is open to interpretation, because this would not be a fallacious attack against a debate opponent.
Although falling foul of Godwin's law tends to cause the individual making the comparison to lose his argument or credibility, Godwin's law itself can be abused as a distraction, diversion or even as censorship, fallaciously miscasting an opponent's argument as hyperbole when the comparisons made by the argument are actually appropriate.[9] Similar criticisms of the "law" (or "at least the distorted version which purports to prohibit all comparisons to German crimes") have been made by Glenn Greenwald.[10]
"
Maryland Patriot
Gold Member
- Jun 10, 2015
- 9,966
- 1,395
- 290
as long as the joke works, run with it.
A quick count shows this is the 30th thread on Hillary Clinton that you've started in the last week.
and hillary is a joke.
Maryland Patriot
Gold Member
- Jun 10, 2015
- 9,966
- 1,395
- 290
is that top or bottom?You would love to be in my position.
JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,540
- 2,165
- Banned
- #67
is that top or bottom?
You are so interested in gay sex. Are you not getting enought? I am talking about one's position in life, such as yours at the car wash.
JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,540
- 2,165
- Banned
- #68
"Goodwyn states when an idiot drags hitler into a conversation, that person is surrendering"
That is often but not always accurate. In the case above, the attack against Godwin is silly.
Trump is potentially a very dangerous individual to be president of the United States. He will, as we have seen, go after those he perceives as his enemies. And some fools in this country want to make him commander in chief.
That is often but not always accurate. In the case above, the attack against Godwin is silly.
Trump is potentially a very dangerous individual to be president of the United States. He will, as we have seen, go after those he perceives as his enemies. And some fools in this country want to make him commander in chief.
Bassman007
Platinum Member
- Sep 10, 2015
- 6,995
- 1,241
- 1,095
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #70
No, because Hillary Clinton rips the heads off of little poor babies, in order to fulfill her ideal of a perfect America.And tell me something dear Bass, if she didn't delete any work related emails, will you vote for her?
Are you going to start a new thread about Hillary Clinton every single time you find some ridiculous Op-Ed to cut and paste?
PS. If she deleted any work e-mail, this is a crime, as these do not belong to her, they belong to me, and every other American, and she had no right to take what belonged to us, which is why every good American is taking notice.
Have you ripped the head off of a small baby yet today? you do know that this is your duty as a Democrap. So go find a small poor child, one with a dirty shirt perhaps and decapitate him or her, then you can join Hillary's campaign staff.
JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,540
- 2,165
- Banned
- #71
Bassman007, no, she doesn't. No, you are not a judge of reality. No, good Americans are not following weirdos like you for advice.
Bassman007
Platinum Member
- Sep 10, 2015
- 6,995
- 1,241
- 1,095
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #73
Thanks for helping me get it................ Next post.
LordBrownTrout
Diamond Member
There are reports that she's been having seizures and has had multiple aneurysms. Not good when the brain is deprived of oxygen.
Bassman007
Platinum Member
- Sep 10, 2015
- 6,995
- 1,241
- 1,095
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #75
And these reports will become the truth, on the day that she believes that she can not escape prosecution. Then she will bow out and head off to a fake FBI monitored witness protection program hospital visit where she will be given just months to live. Then the Democrap Obumma will pardon her to allow Hillary to live in peace in her last days. It's all set in stone already.
billyerock1991
Gold Member
- Apr 24, 2012
- 7,106
- 506
- 140
what has she lied about ... so far all we have heard from the right is she might have sent classified documents to her server ... might have, could have, maybe, isn't a fact its a unfounded accusation ....so far none of them have been proven to be classified at the time they were sent ... so what's your point, other then you hate Hillary .... she has stated she hasn't sent any classified documents to her private server to her knowledge ... how is that a lie ... do you automatically assume its a lie because of your hate towards Hillary ??? and you are hoping that its true, when clearly, so far its not...
Wildman
Gold Member
i have one good one but if i stated it publicly, the FBI would busting down my home with a bulldozer.., e.g., WACO!!
...
Bassman007
Platinum Member
- Sep 10, 2015
- 6,995
- 1,241
- 1,095
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #79
She lied about turning over all work related e-mails, regardless of classification. She did this under oath and the lie is a felony. She also let State dept business come to her e-mail from Google, which means that Google has all of these e-mails on their servers as well, and these are all over the World.
billyerock1991
Gold Member
- Apr 24, 2012
- 7,106
- 506
- 140
don't waste you time on morons like Maryland Patriot... they're usually suffer from sexual frustration and troll the boards for imagenary sex to get off...is that top or bottom?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
brainstorm question for light experiment- Started by trevorjohnson83
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
