The True Difference Between Liberals and "PROGRESSIVES"

[RhodyPatriot]

Liberals have absolutely horrible ideas. Progressives are just batshit crazy woke socialists.

Fair enough.

But most of the Liberals I know would be willing to agree to disagree.

Same with Conservatives and Libertarians.

Progressives are the only ones who, in which instance, would almost inevitably proceed to freak out and go full retard because you've just committed a thought crime and instigated a micro-aggression upon their safe space.

And if you don't comprehend what any of that means you're clearly a Russian racist.

 

[Hum Dinger]

Witness here what we'll call Exhibit B.

The lack of any substantive argument, the ad-hominem screed, the vague allusions to strawmen while he is the one conjuring one from the depths of his own anguish.

Yep, a PROGRESSIVE.

P.S. However, if Richard-H stands for Richard Hell - you at least get points for some modicum of musical taste.

There's no point in arguing the OP because it's pure BULLSHIT.

You have no idea what Liberals & Progressives believe or want. So you've built an entirely FALSE narrative based on pure delusions. An absolute STRAWMAN.

Since I can assume that you're not living in isolation, you've obviously ignored reality for your fantasy world. It's not my job to save you from yourself.

Try posting something intelligent and I'll be happy to debate it.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

There's no point in arguing the OP because it's pure BULLSHIT.

There's no point in arguing because it's pure BULLSHIT, because....

And nada.

You have no idea what Liberals & Progressives believe or want.

I was a Democrat for 16 years.

But you're right, that's not enough of a qualifier, clearly, because.....

And nada.

So you've built an entirely FALSE narrative based on pure delusions.

My narrative is FALSE and purely delusional because....

And nada.

An absolute STRAWMAN.

You already said that, and just like this time, you also didn't provide any basic argument or receipts to support the assertion.

Since I can assume that you're not living in isolation, you've obviously ignored reality for your fantasy world.

My "World" (??) is a fantasy becaaaaauuuuuse.....

And nada.

It's not my job to save you from yourself.

Thank God for that, or I'd be well and truly fucked.

Try posting something intelligent and I'll be happy to debate it.

My post was not intelligent becaaaaaauuuuuse.....

Well, you know.

And there you have it folks, modern New Left PROGRESSIVE tautological "thinking" at its finest.

Take a pill already.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Yep.

Liberalism is not an authoritarian ideology and has all but disappeared from the left.

For starters, it is egalitarian in nature. So-called "progressives" assign privilege by group. Secondly, it acts to protect the individual from the tyranny of the elites. "Progressives" merely act as tools for the elites as they shut down small business to enrich the technocrats.

I can go on and on, but one thing I am sure of is not one single leftist "progressive" here has read so much as a single word by any of the great liberal political philosophers through history.

Liberalism Is the Gateway Drug for Neo-Communism

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Liberalism Is the Gateway Drug for Neo-Communism

I just don't believe that.

I'm no longer a Liberal. I do think it takes a high degree of naivete regarding not only economics, but human nature itself.

However, you can't compare it to Communism - not even at a lower transitional level.

It's still rooted in the potential for discussion and a back and forth dialogue.

Both of those are like poison to the Modern Left who are now utterly steeped in Chairman Mao's repugnant legacy of censorship and death.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I just don't believe that.

I'm no longer a Liberal. I do think it takes a high degree of naivete regarding not only economics, but human nature itself.

However, you can't compare it to Communism - not even at a lower transitional level.

It's still rooted in the potential for discussion and a back and forth dialogue.

Both of those are like poison to the Modern Left who are now utterly steeped in Chairman Mao's repugnant legacy of censorship and death.

When Liberals Get a Reality Check, It Bounces

 

[22lcidw]

For all of us we have a view on hundreds of issues. We have a choice of two major entities to vote for. We narrow it down with our political views on the major in front side looked at and that is not perfect as they can be broken down in segments. the minor ones we do not pay attention to have been added to government legislation passed for years and decades. And when people complain someone will say that law was passed in a certain year. And force it on us all. It was disheartening finding Republican politicians running over to Ukraine when it started. It showed the real traitors, and they came home to their masters when needed.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

For all of us we have a view on hundreds of issues. We have a choice of two major entities to vote for. We narrow it down with our political views on the major in front side looked at and that is not perfect as they can be broken down in segments. the minor ones we do not pay attention to have been added to government legislation passed for years and decades. And when people complain someone will say that law was passed in a certain year. And force it on us all. It was disheartening finding Republican politicians running over to Ukraine when it started. It showed the real traitors, and they came home to their masters when needed.

Man Up and Take Down the Upper Class

Quit worshipping the ruling class's Constitution. Free people would vote on the issues through referendums. That way, we're not stuck with having to accept all the positions of one Party or the other, as we have to do in this elitist republic, where we are nothing but spectators.

The legislators would be no more than law clerks, drawing up bills for us to vote on. There's too much pushy brainwashing in America about basic things. Those who support the ruling snakes' republic are pathetic. They want to pretend they are associated with a Higher Power and, by that fantasy, are superior to the majority.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Man Up and Take Down the Upper Class

Quit worshipping the ruling class's Constitution. Free people would vote on the issues through referendums. That way, we're not stuck with having to accept all the positions of one Party or the other, as we have to do in this elitist republic, where we are nothing but spectators.

The legislators would be no more than law clerks, drawing up bills for us to vote on. There's too much pushy brainwashing in America about basic things. Those who support the ruling snakes' republic are pathetic. They want to pretend they are associated with a Higher Power and, by that fantasy, are superior to the majority.

I dunno....that all sounds a bit Marxist.

How about just create a space where people can thrive, cut out the identity politics, and lift the boot of Government off the common man's throat?

I could live with that.

Class envy summons forth the wrong kind of radicalism that takes down the middle classes.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I dunno....that all sounds a bit Marxist.

How about just create a space where people can thrive, cut out the identity politics, and lift the boot of Government off the common man's throat?

I could live with that.

Class envy summons forth the wrong kind of radicalism that takes down the middle classes.

A Republic Is a Foster Government

Marx and most of the Communist leaders came from the upper class. It was a scam from the beginning. They all established republics, which was not a perversion of the term. By design, elitist oligarchies are all we get from republics, whether elected or not. Electing is different from voting; it's citizens giving up the right to vote on the issues to some know-it-all from the pre-ordained political class. If you accept that kind of system, you have nothing to complain about its results. Besides, the present electorate wasn't franchised by the direct and separate vote of the American people, so its majority is not democratic.

For starters after we remove this electorate of ferals, fairies, and foreigners, any law that the Supreme Court declares to be unConstitutional has to be judged by a national referendum. Second, taxpayers can determine on their tax forms what percentage of their taxes should go to each Department.

People, both on the Right and the Left, mistake Communist ideals for what the Communist actually do. The motivations of both one-party republics and Donkephant republics are the same. Those who control both have a "Born to Rule" attitude.