&
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
☭proletarian☭;1802828 said:
pair 2!
**pats self on back**
☭proletarian☭;1802640 said:all fetuses start out as women.
Not quite. They all start out as pretty much asexual prior to the masculinazation or feminization of the fetus.
thats just a bite of the similarites which have compelled biologists to class us together with chimps. there are more considerations that makes us quite different from an orangutan.....
Ok, you got me on that one.... It seems a bit more ridiculous seeing it in writing, where 3 different types of apes came from this hominid and only one human, in the evolution of things..... why not 3 different humans with one ape form coming out of the great ape? Too strange to be true imho and we will see once again that science will REVISE its theories on this...
Which assumes evolution is directional and occurs with a distinct end in mind. It is not. In fact, mutations that are not immediately deleterious are neither good nor bad on their own. They become good or bad based on the environment in which the species evolves and if they confer an advantage to the species.
For example, penguins have evolved a complex retrograde blood circulation system that allows them to stay warm in the artic.
If you took a penguin and placed them in the equator, they'd be screwed.
Within humans, you can find a jillion design flaws and other genetic flaws that can occur. They confer no real advantage, and the age old question is; why would an intelligent designer create a design with so many flaws?
why not 3 different humans with one ape form coming out of the great ape? Too strange to be true imho and we will see once again that science will REVISE its theories on this...
why not 3 different humans with one ape form coming out of the great ape? Too strange to be true imho and we will see once again that science will REVISE its theories on this...
but, Care, there's homo erectus and australopithicus [sp?] on the more human side of things. neanderthal, perhaps. we'll need to wait for your future revisions to call that one human or not. ever-revising - wait and see or join in the research.
The word "hominid" in this website refers to members of the family of humans, Hominidae, which consists of all species on our side of the last common ancestor of humans and living apes. Hominids are included in the superfamily of all apes, the Hominoidea, the members of which are called hominoids. Although the hominid fossil record is far from complete, and the evidence is often fragmentary, there is enough to give a good outline of the evolutionary history of humans.
The time of the split between humans and living apes used to be thought to have occurred 15 to 20 million years ago, or even up to 30 or 40 million years ago. Some apes occurring within that time period, such as Ramapithecus, used to be considered as hominids, and possible ancestors of humans. Later fossil finds indicated that Ramapithecus was more closely related to the orang-utan, and new biochemical evidence indicated that the last common ancestor of hominids and apes occurred between 5 and 10 million years ago, and probably in the lower end of that range (Lewin 1987). Ramapithecus therefore is no longer considered a hominid.
The field of science which studies the human fossil record is known as paleoanthropology. It is the intersection of the disciplines of paleontology (the study of ancient lifeforms) and anthropology (the study of humans). Hominid Species
why not 3 different humans with one ape form coming out of the great ape? Too strange to be true imho and we will see once again that science will REVISE its theories on this...
but, Care, there's homo erectus and australopithicus [sp?] on the more human side of things. neanderthal, perhaps. we'll need to wait for your future revisions to call that one human or not. ever-revising - wait and see or join in the research.
yes humans have changed but there is still just ONE GENERA of humans that scientists state came from this ancient hominid yet there are THREE different genera of ape like animals that come from this same hominid, the chimp the orangutan and the gorilla according to scientists speculation or hypothesis...
Can you show any other multiple genera coming from the same ancestor whose chromosome count is different among them ...
hmmm, when i was a child we WERE TAUGHT that we came from apes and apes were directly related to us
Hominids are included in the superfamily of all apes
why not 3 different humans with one ape form coming out of the great ape? Too strange to be true imho and we will see once again that science will REVISE its theories on this...
but, Care, there's homo erectus and australopithicus [sp?] on the more human side of things. neanderthal, perhaps. we'll need to wait for your future revisions to call that one human or not. ever-revising - wait and see or join in the research.
yes humans have changed but there is still just ONE GENERA of humans that scientists state came from this ancient hominid yet there are THREE different genera of ape like animals that come from this same hominid, the chimp the orangutan and the gorilla according to scientists speculation or hypothesis....it has NOT BEEN SEALED that this is the real deal yet and for GOOD reason....just in some of the links ya'll have linked up, scientists just a few years ago thought that the XY chromosome began 170 million years ago and NOW they are saying 300 million years ago....they were OFF by nearly 50% on their first assumption or hypothesis....science is ever changing AS IT SHOULD BE.... when newer and more revelations come forward.
We DO NOT know all yet, we are far from it in the scientific realm....and to say that we have concluded or science has concluded is far from the truth....and I am not denying evolution in any manner, just saying that in this particular case....this is not explained or proven in any manner that could lead one to believe it is FACT or even THEORY, but is just hypothesis at this point imho....
Can you show any other multiple genera coming from the same ancestor whose chromosome count is different among them besides humans vs the gorilla, chimp and orangutan? Maybe there is evidence of such and I just missed it? It would help me in believing this hypothesis of human ancestry from a great ape
the ethics of some religious leaders who choose to promote, well, stupidity as a virtue of christianity is a concern ive got