The riots are why Americans have the 2nd Amendment...the government can't or won't protect us...

like the man said, when seconds count the cops are only minutes away
In that case you don’t need guns unless you want to murder black people like a good lil trumper.

Your homies have already said they're going to take it to the burbs.
Bring your ratchty ass HighPoint and come on down boi.

:auiqs.jpg: Big bad suburbs. That is the funniest shit I've read all day.

Maybe where you live suburbanites are a bunch of pussies.
Not in Texas.
We all know how to shoot,buy top end firearms and have a shitload of ammo.
So tell me how this invasion of the suburbs would work?
The first house they hit would warn all the others.
The darkies would be walking into a shistorm of lead.
They dont have the guts to try it anyway. They'll just continue to burn down their own neighborhoods and I'll continue to laugh at em and their impotent rage.

Yes, most suburbanites are pussies. Thanks for the funny story, tho
 
Having a gun to protect you business is problematic when facing a mob in a neighborhood that you live and work in. I think its best to retreat and let the police deal with it.
What police?

They need back up that is why they retreated which is the intelligent thing to do. Still anyone with a gun who thinks it's a good idea to get involved when it would be better to stay home and protect your family. That is my opinion. My only point was is it better to protect your family or your business. Businesses can be rebuilt. Still if the police are retreating why would a business owner be concerned with standing ones ground.
If the police had come down on that mob the moment they illegally entered targets with whatever force necessary the city might have been spared. Due to lack of leadership there is no fucking city to defend.


are you suggesting shoot first and ask questions later. It would have caused more problems

The Detroit race riot 1967
The result was 43 dead, 1,189 injured, over 7,200 arrests, and more than 2,000 buildings destroyed. Johnson sent the federal troops. Needless to say it was ugly with tanks in the streets and accusations of the police and national guards of indiscriminate shooting.

LA riots in 1992

63 people had been killed, 2,383 people had been injured, more than 12,000 had been arrested, It was problematic either way.
 
Having a gun to protect you business is problematic when facing a mob in a neighborhood that you live and work in. I think its best to retreat and let the police deal with it.
What police?

They need back up that is why they retreated which is the intelligent thing to do. Still anyone with a gun who thinks it's a good idea to get involved when it would be better to stay home and protect your family. That is my opinion. My only point was is it better to protect your family or your business. Businesses can be rebuilt. Still if the police are retreating why would a business owner be concerned with standing ones ground.
If the police had come down on that mob the moment they illegally entered targets with whatever force necessary the city might have been spared. Due to lack of leadership there is no fucking city to defend.


are you suggesting shoot first and ask questions later. It would have caused more problems

The Detroit race riot 1967
The result was 43 dead, 1,189 injured, over 7,200 arrests, and more than 2,000 buildings destroyed. Johnson sent the federal troops. Needless to say it was ugly with tanks in the streets and accusations of the police and national guards of indiscriminate shooting.

LA riots in 1992

63 people had been killed, 2,383 people had been injured, more than 12,000 had been arrested, It was problematic either way.
63 killed by the “protestors except for one! And, i did not say shoot first and ask questions later. In stead of standing there watching the lawbreakers leave with their looted shit they should have started arresting the thugs!
 
like the man said, when seconds count the cops are only minutes away
In that case you don’t need guns unless you want to murder black people like a good lil trumper.
Lol, vermin scum are staying busy while their kids burn the country down and the coward police hide in shame.
I think the cops are maybe being ordered to stand down by socialist/progressive mayor of the city
Yup. I wouldn't do it. I'd just take my badge to the mayor and copy dirty Harry and tell him to use it as a suppository.
Some people might

But imagine you are 40 and not eligible to retire

if yiu quit it means starting all over and maybe not being able to take care of your family

thats a tough decision for most people to make
 
We can keep and bear arms as well.


Me for the last 40 years...

Screenshot_2020-05-30-19-25-54(1).png

You, since last Tuesday...

Screenshot_2020-05-30-19-23-23(1).png

Good luck.
 
Bring your ratchty ass HighPoint and come on down boi.

Hells bells man...even I want a Yeet Cannon.

I'd prefer they brought a Lorcin, Davis, Raven or a Phoenix Arms.

I still have my wife's Bryco she had from before we met 23 years ago. Selling it to some poor sap would be a crime... so I'm waiting for a gun buy back in Kansas City. :lmao:
 
Having a gun to protect you business is problematic when facing a mob in a neighborhood that you live and work in. I think its best to retreat and let the police deal with it.
What police?

They need back up that is why they retreated which is the intelligent thing to do. Still anyone with a gun who thinks it's a good idea to get involved when it would be better to stay home and protect your family. That is my opinion. My only point was is it better to protect your family or your business. Businesses can be rebuilt. Still if the police are retreating why would a business owner be concerned with standing ones ground.
If the police had come down on that mob the moment they illegally entered targets with whatever force necessary the city might have been spared. Due to lack of leadership there is no fucking city to defend.


are you suggesting shoot first and ask questions later. It would have caused more problems

The Detroit race riot 1967
The result was 43 dead, 1,189 injured, over 7,200 arrests, and more than 2,000 buildings destroyed. Johnson sent the federal troops. Needless to say it was ugly with tanks in the streets and accusations of the police and national guards of indiscriminate shooting.

LA riots in 1992

63 people had been killed, 2,383 people had been injured, more than 12,000 had been arrested, It was problematic either way.
63 killed by the “protestors except for one! And, i did not say shoot first and ask questions later. In stead of standing there watching the lawbreakers leave with their looted shit they should have started arresting the thugs!

Police have arrested nearly 1,669 people in 22 U.S. cities since Thursday . People are being arrested but it has not stop it from spreading

Still it now about what will Trump do. Will he call for people to be calm or will he condemn the riots and call in the troops. In messages in traditional media he has urged calm

Yet using his tweeter account he has used violent rhetoric "when the looting starts the shooting starts,"

Yes that what we need the President urging shooting

The riots will end but it does matter how it ends.
 
The riots will end but it does matter how it ends.
The riots should end in such a way that causes anyone even remotely contemplating rioting and looting to soil themselves in fear of the consequences. Speaking softly and carrying a big stick only succeeds because, when warranted, you use the stick.
 

Forum List

Back
Top