The rightwing certainly hates liberals/democrats, but they can't seem to defend the GOP

[Wyatt earp]

GOP voters can't explain WHY the poor and middle class should vote republican, but they themselves as poor and middle class earners vote R anyway.

Am I a broken record? Hell yeah. Someone has to drive this point home. Idiots only learn through repetition.

What do you think one day we will have a change of heart and want to.pay high taxes and high cost of living retard?

.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

This figure relates to amnesty of illegals having lived in the US for years. As far as actual border security goes, deportation was up under Obama.

Not even according to left-wing Snopes it isn't:

However, that statistic is somewhat misleading, as a significant portion of it was due to a change in the way “deportations” are defined that began during the Bush administration, not in the actual number of persons turned out of the U.S. As the Los Angeles Times noted, if not for that change in definition about what constitutes a “deportation,” the Obama administration likely would not have been a record-setting one in this area:

The number of people deported at or near the [U.S.-Mexico] border has gone up — primarily as a result of changing who gets counted in the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency’s deportation statistics.

The vast majority of those border crossers would not have been treated as formal deportations under most previous administrations. If all removals were tallied, the total sent back to Mexico each year would have been far higher under those previous administrations than it is now.

Until recent years, most people caught illegally crossing the southern border were simply bused back into Mexico in what officials called “voluntary returns,” but which critics derisively termed “catch and release.” Those removals, which during the 1990s reached more 1 million a year, were not counted in Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s deportation statistics.

Now, the vast majority of border crossers who are apprehended get fingerprinted and formally deported. The change began during the George W. Bush administration and accelerated under Obama. The policy stemmed in part from a desire to ensure that people who had crossed into the country illegally would have formal charges on their records.

In the Obama years, all of the increase in deportations has involved people picked up within 100 miles of the border, most of whom [had] just recently crossed over. In 2013, almost two-thirds of deportations were in that category.

Were More People Deported Under the Obama Administration Than Any Other?

Lol I'm curious. Why didn't Obama just reverse Bush's order?

Why would he? The new definition of deportation only helped him BS people like you. DumBama and his minions ran to the MSM and lied about his success on immigration; making claims that were non-factual; never giving Bush any credit for the change in the definition of deportation.

If he reversed Bush's definition of deportation, it would only reveal that he's done less than his predecessors and not more.

 

[JBond]

GOP voters can't explain WHY the poor and middle class should vote republican, but they themselves as poor and middle class earners vote R anyway.

Am I a broken record? Hell yeah. Someone has to drive this point home. Idiots only learn through repetition.

What we have to do as reasonable human beings is give up the notion that ignorance is just a minority liberal thing....and embrace and except the fact that white people are just as stupid, just as ignorant as everybody else...and then you can understand their rationalization on things. I concluded a long long time ago that the white man and his off spring are really just dumb fucks with privileges allotted by virture of white skin....case in point, the people of ky....here you have 86% of the population hillbilly nut fucks, all on some form of welfare and yet they vote time after time after time the most anti government senators of all time, Paul and Mitch...and these mf's reeeeekkkkkk of handouts!!

Triggered59 is a known racist. He also continues to misspell his own name, so we know he is kinda dumb also.

 

[Billy000]

This figure relates to amnesty of illegals having lived in the US for years. As far as actual border security goes, deportation was up under Obama.

Not even according to left-wing Snopes it isn't:

However, that statistic is somewhat misleading, as a significant portion of it was due to a change in the way “deportations” are defined that began during the Bush administration, not in the actual number of persons turned out of the U.S. As the Los Angeles Times noted, if not for that change in definition about what constitutes a “deportation,” the Obama administration likely would not have been a record-setting one in this area:

The number of people deported at or near the [U.S.-Mexico] border has gone up — primarily as a result of changing who gets counted in the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency’s deportation statistics.

The vast majority of those border crossers would not have been treated as formal deportations under most previous administrations. If all removals were tallied, the total sent back to Mexico each year would have been far higher under those previous administrations than it is now.

Until recent years, most people caught illegally crossing the southern border were simply bused back into Mexico in what officials called “voluntary returns,” but which critics derisively termed “catch and release.” Those removals, which during the 1990s reached more 1 million a year, were not counted in Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s deportation statistics.

Now, the vast majority of border crossers who are apprehended get fingerprinted and formally deported. The change began during the George W. Bush administration and accelerated under Obama. The policy stemmed in part from a desire to ensure that people who had crossed into the country illegally would have formal charges on their records.

In the Obama years, all of the increase in deportations has involved people picked up within 100 miles of the border, most of whom [had] just recently crossed over. In 2013, almost two-thirds of deportations were in that category.

Were More People Deported Under the Obama Administration Than Any Other?

Lol I'm curious. Why didn't Obama just reverse Bush's order?

Why would he? The new definition of deportation only helped him BS people like you. DumBama and his minions ran to the MSM and lied about his success on immigration; making claims that were non-factual; never giving Bush any credit for the change in the definition of deportation.

If he reversed Bush's definition of deportation, it would only reveal that he's done less than his predecessors and not more.

Lol if the bullshit narrative was true that democrats want an open borders, that's exactly what he wouldn't have done.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

This figure relates to amnesty of illegals having lived in the US for years. As far as actual border security goes, deportation was up under Obama.

Not even according to left-wing Snopes it isn't:

However, that statistic is somewhat misleading, as a significant portion of it was due to a change in the way “deportations” are defined that began during the Bush administration, not in the actual number of persons turned out of the U.S. As the Los Angeles Times noted, if not for that change in definition about what constitutes a “deportation,” the Obama administration likely would not have been a record-setting one in this area:

The number of people deported at or near the [U.S.-Mexico] border has gone up — primarily as a result of changing who gets counted in the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency’s deportation statistics.

The vast majority of those border crossers would not have been treated as formal deportations under most previous administrations. If all removals were tallied, the total sent back to Mexico each year would have been far higher under those previous administrations than it is now.

Until recent years, most people caught illegally crossing the southern border were simply bused back into Mexico in what officials called “voluntary returns,” but which critics derisively termed “catch and release.” Those removals, which during the 1990s reached more 1 million a year, were not counted in Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s deportation statistics.

Now, the vast majority of border crossers who are apprehended get fingerprinted and formally deported. The change began during the George W. Bush administration and accelerated under Obama. The policy stemmed in part from a desire to ensure that people who had crossed into the country illegally would have formal charges on their records.

In the Obama years, all of the increase in deportations has involved people picked up within 100 miles of the border, most of whom [had] just recently crossed over. In 2013, almost two-thirds of deportations were in that category.

Were More People Deported Under the Obama Administration Than Any Other?

Lol I'm curious. Why didn't Obama just reverse Bush's order?

Why would he? The new definition of deportation only helped him BS people like you. DumBama and his minions ran to the MSM and lied about his success on immigration; making claims that were non-factual; never giving Bush any credit for the change in the definition of deportation.

If he reversed Bush's definition of deportation, it would only reveal that he's done less than his predecessors and not more.

Lol if the bullshit narrative was true that democrats want an open borders, that's exactly what he wouldn't have done.

You didnt think that through at all.....
barry couldn't call for wide open borders or he would have been crucified.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This figure relates to amnesty of illegals having lived in the US for years. As far as actual border security goes, deportation was up under Obama.

Not even according to left-wing Snopes it isn't:

However, that statistic is somewhat misleading, as a significant portion of it was due to a change in the way “deportations” are defined that began during the Bush administration, not in the actual number of persons turned out of the U.S. As the Los Angeles Times noted, if not for that change in definition about what constitutes a “deportation,” the Obama administration likely would not have been a record-setting one in this area:

The number of people deported at or near the [U.S.-Mexico] border has gone up — primarily as a result of changing who gets counted in the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency’s deportation statistics.

The vast majority of those border crossers would not have been treated as formal deportations under most previous administrations. If all removals were tallied, the total sent back to Mexico each year would have been far higher under those previous administrations than it is now.

Until recent years, most people caught illegally crossing the southern border were simply bused back into Mexico in what officials called “voluntary returns,” but which critics derisively termed “catch and release.” Those removals, which during the 1990s reached more 1 million a year, were not counted in Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s deportation statistics.

Now, the vast majority of border crossers who are apprehended get fingerprinted and formally deported. The change began during the George W. Bush administration and accelerated under Obama. The policy stemmed in part from a desire to ensure that people who had crossed into the country illegally would have formal charges on their records.

In the Obama years, all of the increase in deportations has involved people picked up within 100 miles of the border, most of whom [had] just recently crossed over. In 2013, almost two-thirds of deportations were in that category.

Were More People Deported Under the Obama Administration Than Any Other?

Lol I'm curious. Why didn't Obama just reverse Bush's order?

Why would he? The new definition of deportation only helped him BS people like you. DumBama and his minions ran to the MSM and lied about his success on immigration; making claims that were non-factual; never giving Bush any credit for the change in the definition of deportation.

If he reversed Bush's definition of deportation, it would only reveal that he's done less than his predecessors and not more.

Lol if the bullshit narrative was true that democrats want an open borders, that's exactly what he wouldn't have done.

Then why you guys so against the wall?





.

 

[toobfreak]

GOP voters can't explain WHY the poor and middle class should vote republican, but they themselves as poor and middle class earners vote R anyway.

Am I a broken record? Hell yeah. Someone has to drive this point home. Idiots only learn through repetition.

Then maybe if I repeat this one more time you will begin to get it. GOP voters have NO problem explaining why the poor and middle class should vote republican! You just must not be listening to the right places. They should vote republican so that they have greater opportunities for getting OUT of staying poor or in the lower middle class. Poor and middle class people vote democratic mainly because they want to STAY that way and want the government to continue to administer to their lives through government programs.

No government program ever raised a person out of poverty. Freedom, autonomy, self-actualization and hard work do. Democrats want big government to run your life. Republicans believe people are better at making their own decisions and running their lives themselves.

 

[K9Buck]

GOP voters can't explain WHY the poor and middle class should vote republican, but they themselves as poor and middle class earners vote R anyway.

Am I a broken record? Hell yeah. Someone has to drive this point home. Idiots only learn through repetition.

Yea, we need to flood American with another ten-million penniless illegals as well as import a few hundred thousand Muslim "refugees". That will certainly enhance the quality of life for the average American, right, chump?

 

[JBond]

Another list

Lower taxes
Less regulations
Support for the free market
Enforced borders
Federalism

Etc

And now you're going to pretend that you haven't been answered until this thread gets old and start up another one with the same dishonest assertion.

I already addrsssed the bullshit narrative about taxes and regulations earlier in the thread. Those policies ONLY benefit the rich. Oh and as far as "enforced borders" go, Obama deported more illegals than any president before him.

High deportation figures are misleading

Court Deportations Drop 43 Percent in Past Five Years

Over 140,000 Illegal Aliens Obtained Amnesty Through the "U" Visa Under Obama Admin. | NumbersUSA

This figure relates to amnesty of illegals having lived in the US for years. As far as actual border security goes, deportation was up under Obama.

How deportations were counted was completely changed under Obama to inflate the numbers. You can not compare previous numbers.

High deportation figures are misleading

 

[Billy000]

GOP voters can't explain WHY the poor and middle class should vote republican, but they themselves as poor and middle class earners vote R anyway.

Am I a broken record? Hell yeah. Someone has to drive this point home. Idiots only learn through repetition.

Then maybe if I repeat this one more time you will begin to get it. GOP voters have NO problem explaining why the poor and middle class should vote republican! You just must not be listening to the right places. They should vote republican so that they have greater opportunities for getting OUT of staying poor or in the lower middle class. Poor and middle class people vote democratic mainly because they want to STAY that way and want the government to continue to administer to their lives through government programs.

No government program ever raised a person out of poverty. Freedom, autonomy, self-actualization and hard work do. Democrats want big government to run your life. Republicans believe people are better at making their own decisions and running their lives themselves.

lol what are you even talking about? Republicans do nothing to provide opportunities to the poor.

 

[toobfreak]

GOP voters can't explain WHY the poor and middle class should vote republican, but they themselves as poor and middle class earners vote R anyway.

Am I a broken record? Hell yeah. Someone has to drive this point home. Idiots only learn through repetition.

Then maybe if I repeat this one more time you will begin to get it. GOP voters have NO problem explaining why the poor and middle class should vote republican! You just must not be listening to the right places. They should vote republican so that they have greater opportunities for getting OUT of staying poor or in the lower middle class. Poor and middle class people vote democratic mainly because they want to STAY that way and want the government to continue to administer to their lives through government programs.

No government program ever raised a person out of poverty. Freedom, autonomy, self-actualization and hard work do. Democrats want big government to run your life. Republicans believe people are better at making their own decisions and running their lives themselves.

lol what are you even talking about? Republicans do nothing to provide opportunities to the poor.

You poor, mindless twit. Opportunities don't come in more government programs, opportunities come in the form of less encumbrances for keeping you poor, for those willing to work their way out of poverty.

 

[JBond]

GOP voters can't explain WHY the poor and middle class should vote republican, but they themselves as poor and middle class earners vote R anyway.

Am I a broken record? Hell yeah. Someone has to drive this point home. Idiots only learn through repetition.

Then maybe if I repeat this one more time you will begin to get it. GOP voters have NO problem explaining why the poor and middle class should vote republican! You just must not be listening to the right places. They should vote republican so that they have greater opportunities for getting OUT of staying poor or in the lower middle class. Poor and middle class people vote democratic mainly because they want to STAY that way and want the government to continue to administer to their lives through government programs.

No government program ever raised a person out of poverty. Freedom, autonomy, self-actualization and hard work do. Democrats want big government to run your life. Republicans believe people are better at making their own decisions and running their lives themselves.

lol what are you even talking about? Republicans do nothing to provide opportunities to the poor.

There is a fundamental disconnect between what you believe and reality. Let's start with the quality of education in large cities. Let's examine Democrat strongholds. The producers create the money, the government spends it. Then what? Return on investment?

 

[Wyatt earp]

GOP voters can't explain WHY the poor and middle class should vote republican, but they themselves as poor and middle class earners vote R anyway.

Am I a broken record? Hell yeah. Someone has to drive this point home. Idiots only learn through repetition.

Then maybe if I repeat this one more time you will begin to get it. GOP voters have NO problem explaining why the poor and middle class should vote republican! You just must not be listening to the right places. They should vote republican so that they have greater opportunities for getting OUT of staying poor or in the lower middle class. Poor and middle class people vote democratic mainly because they want to STAY that way and want the government to continue to administer to their lives through government programs.

No government program ever raised a person out of poverty. Freedom, autonomy, self-actualization and hard work do. Democrats want big government to run your life. Republicans believe people are better at making their own decisions and running their lives themselves.

lol what are you even talking about? Republicans do nothing to provide opportunities to the poor.

Yeh we know you are a lefty and the word "jobs" is a dirty word.



.

 

[Chuz Life]

Republicans do nothing to provide opportunities to the poor.

How many "poor" impoverished Dimocraps have ever given YOU a job?

How many have you worked for?

 

[Spare_change]

It's been discussed a billion times here. Will one billion and one clue you in?

You can't explain it and you know it. You'll say "they cut taxes!" And then I'll say "only for the wealthy and trickle down economics has proven to be a complete joke." Then you'll say "well they get rid of regulations!" And I'll say, regulations have an insignificant effect on job loss for the lower classes.

I guess if you're a bigot who hates gay people, maybe that's a reason to vote R. At least be honest about it.

Childish.

 

[JBond]

It's been discussed a billion times here. Will one billion and one clue you in?

You can't explain it and you know it. You'll say "they cut taxes!" And then I'll say "only for the wealthy and trickle down economics has proven to be a complete joke." Then you'll say "well they get rid of regulations!" And I'll say, regulations have an insignificant effect on job loss for the lower classes.

I guess if you're a bigot who hates gay people, maybe that's a reason to vote R. At least be honest about it.

I understand you are at a disadvantage (obvious handicaps), but W cut taxes for everyone and revenue continued to climb.

Regarding regulations, how many employees do you have? Have you hit the magic 50 number yet?

 

[Billy000]

GOP voters can't explain WHY the poor and middle class should vote republican, but they themselves as poor and middle class earners vote R anyway.

Am I a broken record? Hell yeah. Someone has to drive this point home. Idiots only learn through repetition.

Then maybe if I repeat this one more time you will begin to get it. GOP voters have NO problem explaining why the poor and middle class should vote republican! You just must not be listening to the right places. They should vote republican so that they have greater opportunities for getting OUT of staying poor or in the lower middle class. Poor and middle class people vote democratic mainly because they want to STAY that way and want the government to continue to administer to their lives through government programs.

No government program ever raised a person out of poverty. Freedom, autonomy, self-actualization and hard work do. Democrats want big government to run your life. Republicans believe people are better at making their own decisions and running their lives themselves.

lol what are you even talking about? Republicans do nothing to provide opportunities to the poor.

You poor, mindless twit. Opportunities don't come in more government programs, opportunities come in the form of less encumbrances for keeping you poor, for those willing to work their way out of poverty.

lol you can't give specific examples of what you're talking about because you're just making shit up.

 

[Billy000]

It's been discussed a billion times here. Will one billion and one clue you in?

You can't explain it and you know it. You'll say "they cut taxes!" And then I'll say "only for the wealthy and trickle down economics has proven to be a complete joke." Then you'll say "well they get rid of regulations!" And I'll say, regulations have an insignificant effect on job loss for the lower classes.

I guess if you're a bigot who hates gay people, maybe that's a reason to vote R. At least be honest about it.

I understand you are at a disadvantage (obvious handicaps), but W cut taxes for everyone and revenue continued to climb.

Regarding regulations, how many employees do you have? Have you hit the magic 50 number yet?

No, revenue climbed in raw dollars. The actual measure of valued revenue decreased under Bush. You do understand inflation right?

 

[JBond]

It's been discussed a billion times here. Will one billion and one clue you in?

You can't explain it and you know it. You'll say "they cut taxes!" And then I'll say "only for the wealthy and trickle down economics has proven to be a complete joke." Then you'll say "well they get rid of regulations!" And I'll say, regulations have an insignificant effect on job loss for the lower classes.

I guess if you're a bigot who hates gay people, maybe that's a reason to vote R. At least be honest about it.

I understand you are at a disadvantage (obvious handicaps), but W cut taxes for everyone and revenue continued to climb.

Regarding regulations, how many employees do you have? Have you hit the magic 50 number yet?

No, revenue climbed in raw dollars. The actual measure of valued revenue decreased under Bush. You do understand inflation right?

I absolutely understand inflation. 9/11 and poor planning in the south, in particular the chocolate city, as their mayor called it, stalled the effects. Revenue over his tenure was up.

Federal Receipt and Outlay Summary

 

[FA_Q2]

You really need to change the title of this thread.

Clearly it has been explained to you. Clearly you think that disagreement with the concepts is the same as not having any in the first place. It would be difficult to find a more ignorant position to take.