The real reason Democrats support illegal immigration

JGalt

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
83,969
Reaction score
111,073
Points
3,635
It's not about "compassion", nor is it because they believe "We are a nation of immigrants."

It's all about political power.


"Every 740,000 deportations in a blue state is another Congressional seat flipped from blue to red

Democrats stole these seats with an open border

Time to take them back..."

 
Yet Republicans get elected and some even as the president.
 
It's not about "compassion", nor is it because they believe "We are a nation of immigrants."
Oh no, we never believed any of that. One thing democrats aren't is compassionate. And practically none of the people saying that about these immigrants is Latino/Asian themselves.

It's all about political power.
On linear math alone going by those figures, one might assume that Democrats have stolen more than 50 congressional districts.

And that would not surprise me.
 
If the Democrats were without the benefit of illegals, Republicans would control the entire country forever.

"Democrat power in California rests on that mixture of cronyism, corruption and illegal aliens.

Indeed, California is a prime example of a state where political power is built around illegal aliens. Whether or not the illegals actually vote in any number matters less than whether they’re counted for ‘ghost’ districts filled with non-citizens. California’s millions of illegal aliens represent local, statewide and congressional seats that give the Democrats a total lock on power.

The state lost a congressional seat because its population only grew from 37.3 million to 39.5 million. How many congressional seats would California lose without its illegal alien population?

Subtract even the most liberal number of illegal aliens and California would lose 4 seats (in addition to the one it already lost) bringing its congressional delegation down to 48 seats. That would be bad news for efforts by the Democrats to retake the House, but it would also cut California’s power in the electoral college and would make it harder for the Dems to win presidential elections. That is why they’re willing to risk civil war for illegals.

Another way of looking at ‘sanctuary states’ and ‘cities’ is that they serve the purpose of ensuring that illegal aliens take part in local affairs to the maximum degree possible and that when a census taker shows up, they’re happy to answer questions and be counted. That, as both Democrats and Justice Roberts understood during Trump’s first term, is almost as important as actually going out there and voting. It’s why Democrats fight against not only Voter ID, but any restrictions on the participation of illegal aliens in any area of public life.

What would the Democrats look like without an illegal population somewhere in the 30 million range? (Estimates vary wildly of the actual number. And that’s part of the problem.)

The tens of millions of illegal aliens around the country inflate Democrat political power much as the number of slaves once did before the Civil War. If America’s illegals were to be deported, Democrats could lose as many as 15 electoral college votes and close elections would naturally trend toward Republicans. The political map would change. Democrats would cease to be competitive in national elections without fundamentally reorienting their message.

And that is why the Democrats are willing to risk civil war to fight for illegal aliens in California."

Why Dems Are Fighting a Civil War Over Illegal Aliens | Frontpage Mag
 
Six hours and not a single Democrat has shown up to deny it. :laughing0301:
 
It's not about "compassion", nor is it because they believe "We are a nation of immigrants."

It's all about political power.


"Every 740,000 deportations in a blue state is another Congressional seat flipped from blue to red

Democrats stole these seats with an open border

Time to take them back..."
Reality is not so simple, both Red and Blue states would be affected:
In 2022, California and Texas had the highest numbers of unauthorized immigrants, with 2.6 million and 2.1 million respectively, according to the Office of Homeland Security Statistics. These two states accounted for 42% of the total unauthorized immigrant population. Other states with large populations include Florida (590,000), New Jersey (490,000), Illinois (420,000), and New York (410,000).​
 
Reality is not so simple, both Red and Blue states would be affected:
In 2022, California and Texas had the highest numbers of unauthorized immigrants, with 2.6 million and 2.1 million respectively, according to the Office of Homeland Security Statistics. These two states accounted for 42% of the total unauthorized immigrant population. Other states with large populations include Florida (590,000), New Jersey (490,000), Illinois (420,000), and New York (410,000).​

Still a net increase for the Red, and you don't factor in that there would be shifts in States themselves as cities would lose part of their populations far more than the suburban rural areas.
 
Reality is not so simple, both Red and Blue states would be affected:
In 2022, California and Texas had the highest numbers of unauthorized immigrants, with 2.6 million and 2.1 million respectively, according to the Office of Homeland Security Statistics. These two states accounted for 42% of the total unauthorized immigrant population. Other states with large populations include Florida (590,000), New Jersey (490,000), Illinois (420,000), and New York (410,000).​

Texas and Florida are resolving that problem. So why aren't California, New Jersey. Illinois, and New York? They seem to be the states that are most adamantly-opposed to ICE roundups.
 
Texas and Florida are resolving that problem. So why aren't California, New Jersey. Illinois, and New York? They seem to be the states that are most adamantly-opposed to ICE roundups.
I don't think there was any issue with deporting criminals as Trump promised in the campaign. Turns out that they constituted a tiny fraction of the illegals already here. Now they are deporting people that have jobs and families and add to the local economy. What benefit do the states get by deporting them?
 
Increased tax collection, Social Security payments, and other reasons for illegal immigrants.
 
I don't think there was any issue with deporting criminals as Trump promised in the campaign. Turns out that they constituted a tiny fraction of the illegals already here. Now they are deporting people that have jobs and families and add to the local economy. What benefit do the states get by deporting them?

More jobs openings. Won't that look great in the next jobs report? :laughing0301:
 
Still a net increase for the Red, and you don't factor in that there would be shifts in States themselves as cities would lose part of their populations far more than the suburban rural areas.
Farms and factories, where a lot of illegals work are in rural areas too.
 
Farms and factories, where a lot of illegals work are in rural areas too.

Not as many that crowd cities.

And the ones that work farms move around a lot and I doubt get counted.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom