The Question is No Longer, "Was the 2020 Election Stolen," it is...

No, there isn't. I understand you think there is and are hoping to string this bullshit into the 2024 elections next year...but the result will be the same.
Still no evidence.

Thanks for playing.
There has never been the slightest iota or scintilla of meaningful evidence against Trump but that fact doesn’t deter you assholes from ignoring the lack of evidence in his case.

Meanwhile, more and more stuff keeps coming out about Potato. Accumulating the evidence of potato rot takes time. I keep telling you nitwits.

I know you’d prefer to ignore reality. BUT, tough shit. 😎
 
There has never been the slightest iota or scintilla of meaningful evidence against Trump but that fact doesn’t deter you assholes from ignoring the lack of evidence in his case.

Meanwhile, more and more stuff keeps coming out about Potato. Accumulating the evidence of potato rot takes time. I keep telling you nitwits.

I know you’d prefer to ignore reality. BUT, tough shit. 😎
4 cases and 91 counts would seem to suggest otherwise for the Orange Roughy. Don't worry, they got him. Just a matter of how badly he's gonna pay.
Meanwhile, still nothing on Biden. And it's not like you haven't had your chances. But just like presenting evidence of voter fraud in 2020, your snipe hunt on the Bidens is turning out the same way. :abgg2q.jpg:
 
4 cases and 91 counts would seem to suggest otherwise for the Orange Roughy. Don't worry, they got him. Just a matter of how badly he's gonna pay.
Meanwhile, still nothing on Biden. And it's not like you haven't had your chances. But just like presenting evidence of voter fraud in 2020, your snipe hunt on the Bidens is turning out the same way. :abgg2q.jpg:
The don't suggest anything of the sort. All they show is how corrupt Democrat government employees are.
 
4 cases and 91 counts would seem to suggest otherwise for the Orange Roughy.
False. All it points to is that the Brandon Miscarriage of Justice Department and some other liberal Democrat persecutors are more interested in political persecutions than anything approaching fairness or honesty.

But fear not. You assclowns wil need a lot more than this persecution bullshit. You would need for the failure of our entire justice system including the appellate courts. That won’t happen.
 
False. All it points to is that the Brandon Miscarriage of Justice Department and some other liberal Democrat persecutors are more interested in political persecutions than anything approaching fairness or honesty.

But fear not. You assclowns wil need a lot more than this persecution bullshit. You would need for the failure of our entire justice system including the appellate courts. That won’t happen.
Except that it was a jury of his peers that returned the 91 counts against him. Not Democrats.
He is being "prosecuted"..not "persecuted".

Again, they got him. Only question is how badly he's going to pay.
 
The don't suggest anything of the sort. All they show is how corrupt Democrat government employees are.
Again, Democrats didn't return any indictments against him. Several grand juries of his peers did.
All it shows is that your savior is corrupt. That's all.
 
Except that it was a jury of his peers that returned the 91 counts against him. Not Democrats.
He is being "prosecuted"..not "persecuted".

Again, they got him. Only question is how badly he's going to pay.
They weren't his peers. They were drones hand picked by the prosecutor. They were almost certainly all Democrats. He is being persecuted.
 
Again, Democrats didn't return any indictments against him. Several grand juries of his peers did.
All it shows is that your savior is corrupt. That's all.
Yes, Democrats did. Again, they aren't his peers. That's a myth. All it shoes is that Democrats are corrupt.
 
Except that it was a jury of his peers that returned the 91 counts against him. Not Democrats.
Nope. There were only grand juries getting political persecution one-sided efforts from diseased vermin.

That doesn’t mean a thing. No indictment ever qualifies as evidence of any charged crime.
He is being "prosecuted"..not "persecuted".

Non he is being persecuted; not prosecuted.
Again, they got him. Only question is how badly he's going to pay.
No. They don’t “got” anything.

The only question is whether any convictions could possibly withstand appellate scrutiny. And I doubt any of them will.
 
Lol, these retards are always good for a hefty old laugh. Guess owning the lib is a thing of the past. According to them the lib owns them. How does it feel to be owned by the lib so well?
 
Nope. There were only grand juries getting political persecution one-sided efforts from diseased vermin.
No. There weren't. These were his peers, hearing the evidence, and returning the indictments.
That doesn’t mean a thing. No indictment ever qualifies as evidence of any charged crime.
No. An indictment is only the beginning. The trial will show any evidence of a charged crime. But the charge comes first.
Non he is being persecuted; not prosecuted.
Prosecuted.
No. They don’t “got” anything.
Yeah, they got him.
The only question is whether any convictions could possibly withstand appellate scrutiny. And I doubt any of them will.
That's what the appeals process is for. But the trial happens first.
And he's gonna be convicted on at least a few of those 91 counts.
 
No. There weren't. These were his peers, hearing the evidence, and returning the indictments.

No. An indictment is only the beginning. The trial will show any evidence of a charged crime. But the charge comes first.

Prosecuted.

Yeah, they got him.
uh huh... and like a dog chasing a car, what are they going to do with him when the catch him?
 
uh huh... and like a dog chasing a car, what are they going to do with him when the catch him?
Confine him to Mar-A-Lago with an ankle bracelet and no access to Internet and social media...for the rest of his existence.
Treat it just like prison. Hey...he can have Melania for those conjugal visits. :auiqs.jpg:
 
No. There weren't. These were his peers, hearing the evidence, and returning the indictments.

You’re too retarded to know what “peers” even means. But whatever. They were still nothing but grand juries. And grand juries often hear but one side. And the law is given to them by prosecutors. They may then accuse. But that’s all they do.

An indictment remains legally of no evidentiary value.
No. An indictment is only the beginning. The trial will show any evidence of a charged crime. But the charge comes first.
I’m happy you seem to have finally grasped that accusations necessarily precede trials. :itsok:

Of course, I never said, suggested or implied anything else.
Prosecuted.
Persecuted.
Yeah, they got him.
No. They only have gotten some charges. None are proved. And even obtaining convictions (if any) won’t mean shit. Reversals in cases like this shit are subject to reversalsnon appeal.
That's what the appeals process is for. But the trial happens first.
Again. I’m glad the order of things is finally being grasped by you. You idiot.
And he's gonna be convicted on at least a few of those 91 counts.

And none of his convictions are likely to withstand appellate scrutiny.
 
Confine him to Mar-A-Lago with an ankle bracelet and no access to Internet and social media...for the rest of his existence.
Treat it just like prison. Hey...he can have Melania for those conjugal visits. :auiqs.jpg:
you're THAT terrified of the guy.
 
you're THAT terrified of the guy.
Not at all. But if he's convicted and sentenced, he should be treated like any other convict. We both know he won't be sent to any kind of prison, not even a Camp Cupcake. So this would be acceptable. And fitting. A prisoner in the palace he built. :auiqs.jpg:

No one is above the law.
 
Not at all. But if he's convicted and sentenced, he should be treated like any other convict. We both know he won't be sent to any kind of prison, not even a Camp Cupcake. So this would be acceptable. And fitting. A prisoner in the palace he built. :auiqs.jpg:

No one is above the law.
Wrong. High ranking Dims are above the law. Only Republicans go to prison.
 
Confine him to Mar-A-Lago with an ankle bracelet and no access to Internet and social media...for the rest of his existence.
Treat it just like prison. Hey...he can have Melania for those conjugal visits. :auiqs.jpg:
That in no way deals with the problem. (hint: the problem isn't Trump)
 

Forum List

Back
Top