The Pedophilia accusations rule?

[manifold]

I understand why it's against the rules to accuse other posters of supporting and/or engaging in pedophilia, but is it really fair to enforce that rule when the poster in question openly flaunts their predilection, more or less daring anyone and everyone to call them on it, thereby earning themselves a ban?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

How about expanding it to include accusations of child abuse, child predator?

openly flaunts their predilection

How about requiring proof of nasty accusations?

 

[manifold]

How about expanding it to include accusations of child abuse, child predator?

openly flaunts their predilection

How about requiring proof of nasty accusations?

English, do you speak it ************?

 

[Moonglow]

Ruff!

normally you would PM the Mod Squad Unit Patrol of the subject..and ask....

 

[Howey]

Ruff!

normally you would PM the Mod Squad Unit Patrol of the subject..and ask....

Why?

 

[Moonglow]

To get a faster answer...

 

[Luddly Neddite]

How about expanding it to include accusations of child abuse, child predator?

openly flaunts their predilection

How about requiring proof of nasty accusations?

English, do you speak it ************?

There's a good reason why we have the Cesspool, er, uh, I mean, the Flame Zone.

 

[Moonglow]

How about expanding it to include accusations of child abuse, child predator?



How about requiring proof of nasty accusations?

English, do you speak it ************?

There's a good reason why we have the Cesspool, er, uh, I mean, the Flame Zone.

At my age they are mothers.....sooooo..A-l-l day long I dream of hump-ing~Alice in Chains

 

[Howey]

No Accusations of other members relating to bestiality or pedophilia.

The previous seems fairly concise.

However, posts such as this are prevalent on this forum with obviously direct reference to paedophiliac activity when taken in context:

I don't think he/she was talking just about watching

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-f...-about-sex-ed-for-9-to-11-year-old-girls.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-f...-phil-robertson-a-paedophile.html#post9518816

The trend was noticed here...

I do, this poster is trench coat creepy to me. Creepy
Seems like all he posts about is gay sex, bi sex, porn ect ect ect.

Delta4
http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...hy-harm-children-who-view-it.html#post9452354

Delta4 - My guess is he gets a perverted sexual gratification out of it - there are many bizarre and strange fetishes among the perverted realm and Delta4 seems to exhibit a "creepy - trenchcoat" delight in exposing himself to normal people. He most likely masturbates while posting , or flips back and forth between gay porn sites while posting on USMB. Other than that , so long as he limits himnself to the internet - all he can do is give you the Heeby Jeebies, just put him on ignore.

What's creepy are the posters who insist on drawing incorrect conclusions even though they have nothing to support their opinions.

You say you "guess" but what you're really saying is that you have decided that the real reason Delta posted about FACTS is that "he gets a perverted sexual gratification out of it".

Two of our resident fake christians pulled the same shit on me and there's now a new thread in the Flame Zone where several are doing it to Howey.

The real creeps are people like you and them who lie about other posters and are so lacking in basic human decency that you think there's nothing wrong in accusing other posters of being child predators.

There have been, by my estimation, five to six posts today reported by myself and others regarding these soooooooooooooooooooooclose accusations of paedophilia, it is my opinion that a change to the Forum Rules is necessary.

No Accusation or inference to other members relating to bestiality or pedophilia is strictly prohibited and will result in a ban.

Much like the "family" rule....one that's so broadly applied it's ridiculous.

Another suggestion is to make obvious flaming and/or taunting posts outside of the Flame Zone punishable. There are two or three members of this forum who contribute nothing, absolutely nothing to the forum, but taunting.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

 

[Howey]

To get a faster answer...

...

 

[rightwinger]

I always thought that was off limits

 

[TheOldSchool]

Yup it's off limits. I know because my hilarious pajama boy joke was pulled before it even had a chance

 

[Defiant1]

I'm going to ask my mommy....

 

[Mad Scientist]

I personally don't see it but I think NLT summed it up quite nicely here:

"Not only are u a POS faggoty whining little *****, you are a rat bastard tattle tale as well."

 

[boedicca]

No Accusation or inference to other members relating to bestiality or pedophilia is strictly prohibited and will result in a ban.

(snip)

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

So, let me get this straight. You want to ban anyone who reads another person's post and infers from said post that it is a reference to bestiality or pedophilia?

That's Rather Harsh....Just sayin'.

 

[mal]

I'm not being reported?...



peace...

 

[mal]

No Accusations of other members relating to bestiality or pedophilia.

The previous seems fairly concise.

However, posts such as this are prevalent on this forum with obviously direct reference to paedophiliac activity when taken in context:

I don't think he/she was talking just about watching

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-f...-about-sex-ed-for-9-to-11-year-old-girls.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-f...-phil-robertson-a-paedophile.html#post9518816

The trend was noticed here...

What's creepy are the posters who insist on drawing incorrect conclusions even though they have nothing to support their opinions.

You say you "guess" but what you're really saying is that you have decided that the real reason Delta posted about FACTS is that "he gets a perverted sexual gratification out of it".

Two of our resident fake christians pulled the same shit on me and there's now a new thread in the Flame Zone where several are doing it to Howey.

The real creeps are people like you and them who lie about other posters and are so lacking in basic human decency that you think there's nothing wrong in accusing other posters of being child predators.

There have been, by my estimation, five to six posts today reported by myself and others regarding these soooooooooooooooooooooclose accusations of paedophilia, it is my opinion that a change to the Forum Rules is necessary.

No Accusation or inference to other members relating to bestiality or pedophilia is strictly prohibited and will result in a ban.

Much like the "family" rule....one that's so broadly applied it's ridiculous.

Another suggestion is to make obvious flaming and/or taunting posts outside of the Flame Zone punishable. There are two or three members of this forum who contribute nothing, absolutely nothing to the forum, but taunting.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

You be sure to be Honest and Report Ravi while yoar at it.

She makes MANY Inferences... I even think you might have "Thanked" one.



peace...

 

[Yurt]

if you notice, he is making these "questions" public in order to try to get a certain poster or posters banned and because he made the "question" public, he thinks everyone will now know why (if a ban) the person is banned.

if these were really general questions, he wouldn't need to cite a specific person. he is just a troll.

 

[R.D.]

I understand why it's against the rules to accuse other posters of supporting and/or engaging in pedophilia, but is it really fair to enforce that rule when the poster in question openly flaunts their predilection, more or less daring anyone and everyone to call them on it, thereby earning themselves a ban?

I guess posters can brag, but others may not take notice and discuss it

 

[Samson]

Edit.