The NYPD is editing Wiki pages and got caught red handed

ClosedCaption

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2010
53,233
6,719
1,830
Edits to Wikipedia pages on Bell Garner Diallo traced to 1 Police Plaza Capital New York

Edits to Wikipedia pages on Bell, Garner, Diallo traced to 1 Police Plaza

Computer users identified by Capital as working on the NYPD headquarters' network have edited and attempted to delete Wikipedia entries for several well-known victims of police altercations, including entries for Eric Garner, Sean Bell, and Amadou Diallo. Capital identified 85 NYPD addresses that have edited Wikipedia, although it is unclear how many users were involved, as computers on the NYPD network can operate on the department’s range of IP addresses.

NYPD IP addresses have also been used to edit entries on stop-and-frisk, NYPD scandals, and prominent figures in the city’s political and police leadership.

skip

On three separate occasions between October 2012 and March 2013, a user on the 1 Police Plaza network edited the “Stop-and-frisk” entry. The changes are as follows; bolded words indicate edits:

“The stop-and-frisk program of New York City is a practice of the New York City Police Department to stop, question, and search people.” was changed to “The stop-and-frisk program of New York City is a practice of the New York City Police Department to stop, question and, if the circumstances of the stop warrant it, conduct a frisk of the person stopped.”

● “The stop-and-frisk program of New York City is a practice of the New York City Police Department to stop, question and, if the circumstances of the stop warrant it, conduct a frisk of the person stopped.” was changed to “The stop-and-frisk program of New York City is a practice of the New York City Police Department by which a police officer who reasonably suspects a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a felony or a Penal Law misdemeanor, stops and questions that person, and, if the circumstances of the stop warrant it, conducts a frisk of the person stopped.”

● “The rules for stop and frisk are found in New York State Criminal Procedure Law section 140.50, and are based on the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Terry v. Ohio” was added to the entry.

● “if the circumstances of the stop warrant it, conducts a frisk of the person stopped” was changed to “if the officer reasonably suspects he or she is in danger of physical injury, frisks the person stopped for weapons.”

● An extraneous “and” was removed from a sentence.

On two separate occasions, a user on the 1 Police Plaza network edited sections of Wikipedia’s “New York City Police Department” entry that described police misconduct. On June 30, 2006, the user deleted 1,502 characters from the “scandals and corruption” section, including a sentence that claimed “at the end of March, 2006, NYPD started to make changes to this very article in an attempt to censor scandals and corruption information.” The full deleted text can be read here.

On June 19, 2008, a user on the 1 Police Plaza network deleted the entire “Allegations of police misconduct and the Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB)” and “Other incidents” sections from the entry, for a combined total of 25,611 deleted characters. The full deleted text can be read here and here.

Wikipedia discourages users from making edits that might constitute a conflict of interest. “COI [conflict of interest] editing involves contributing to Wikipedia to promote your own interests, including your business or financial interests, or those of your external relationships, such as with family, friends or employers,” Wikipedia states in its behavioral guidelines. “COI editing is strongly discouraged.”

A list of all anonymous Wikipedia edits made by NYPD IP addresses is available here.
 
Thank you for reminding us of this. I know I've read wiki articles and then several months later they have changed, and one always has to check the footnotes out, and then other sources as well. Sometimes they even say Citation needed, so we must be careful.
 
so what? The NYPD isn't allowed to edit Wiki articles about them that they feel are wrong?

Much ado over nothing

Meanwhile, who cares that Democrats break laws left and right LOL idiots.
 
Anything that can have any hint of a political bias, can't be trusted on wiki. Only one side of the spectrum usually wins out in keeping their 'stories', as I call them, in tact.
 
so what? The NYPD isn't allowed to edit Wiki articles about them that they feel are wrong?

Much ado over nothing

Meanwhile, who cares that Democrats break laws left and right LOL idiots.


Thanks, I got you down in the "truth dont matter" category. Oh and the NYPD themselves care a lot

“The matter is under internal review,” an NYPD spokeswoman, Det. Cheryl Crispin, wrote in an email to Capital after examples of the changes were presented to the NYPD.

So although you dont care about it...they seem to
 
so what? The NYPD isn't allowed to edit Wiki articles about them that they feel are wrong?

Much ado over nothing

Meanwhile, who cares that Democrats break laws left and right LOL idiots.


Thanks, I got you down in the "truth dont matter" category.


Truth? LOL

this thread isn't about the truth, it's a whine about the NYPD changing wiki articles.

If it turns out what they changed it to is false, then that is a different matter.
 
They were correcting liberal lies. That's why Wiki can be edited.


If it turns out that the NYPD lied,, then I would agree that is wrong, But it is NOT wrong for them to edit Wiki articles that are editable for a reason, and THAT is what the OP was whining about.

OP an idiot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top