Try reading the board as I have given it many times, so many times in fact that only one moronic ISLAMONAZI STOOGE still wants it repeating. Try the LoN treaties from 1920, 1922 and 1924 that entered International Law.
Oh look, another deflection...
View attachment 35856
Huh??? What "deflection"? Phoenall's comment is right on. Gosh, no wonder you seem so upset.
Upset? No, just bored with the continual use of 'CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW' by some when they have no real understanding of what it is and how it is applied...
Just because I piss on an olive tree for 35 years, a custom to me, does not make it a 'LAW' that I can apply to that olive tree or any olive tree inexistence.
How far do you want to take it? Governments accept, in principle, the existence of customary international law...
So, beheading is a custom, circumcision is a custom...
Bombing civilians is a custom to some...
The use of the word 'LAW' is misleading as it is only a "consideration" under international law, it is not a law unto itself...
Some 'CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAWS' do become law through treaty... But not so many!
When Phoney throws out the "CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW" he knows that he is going to get his ass kicked off the face of the forum for his 'CUSTOMARY STUPIDITY' that we have all now come to associate him with...
So, am I upset?
No, fools, never upset me, their continued foolery is just a basic annoyance that proves they are out of their depth and have little to no intelligence to get involved in something that they actually have no understanding about!
Once a fool, always a fool... Repeating the same foolish BS is about as useful as putting super glue on your fingers, touching them together and wondering why your fingers stick over, and, over, and, over, and, over, and, over...
Fortunately, Phoney isn't the only fool who repeats his own BS there are plenty from both side of the argument...
Thank you and good night!