Donāt Make Me Shoot You
Nafeez Ahmed reports that,
ā
White highlights a
Haāaretz report from 2009 which revealed that āIDF officers were receiving legal advice that allowed for large numbers of civilian casualties and the targeting of government buildings.ā
āThe people who go into a house despite a warning
do not have to be taken into account in terms of injury to civilians, because they are voluntary human shields,ā
said one senior official of the international law division (ILD) of the Israeli Military Advocate Generalās Office.
āFrom the legal point of view
, I do not have to show consideration for them. In the case of people who return to their home in order to protect it, they are taking part in the fighting.ā (emphasis added)
This statement presupposes that Israel has the right to order people out of their homes, without having to give a justification, without having to prove that it is a military outpost, just an arbitrary pronouncement by the military and either the civilians must flee or be murdered in cold blood by the IDF, in which case they will be referred to as āhuman shieldsā and their extrajudicial slaughter justified in the eyes of the military machine and its legal aides; even if the civilian does flee, Israel presupposes the right to destroy their homes, property, and belongings- in other words, their property (and as well their lives) belong to us, because we say so.
According to U.S. Army Manuals terrorism is defined as, the
ācalculated use of unlawful violence
or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear. It is intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies ā¦
[to attain] political, religious, or ideological goals.ā [U.S. Army Field Manual No. FM 3-0, Chapter 9, 37 (14 June 2001).]
Israelās actions are therefore the exact definition of terrorism according to the U.S. army, where even just
the threat of violence to obtain political goals is terrorism; Israel is saying to the civilian population āleave your homes, or else,ā while then presupposing that if their orders are not heeded they are thus absolved from the responsibility of the murder which they will then go about committing. Even if they were just to threaten the use of violence to get people out of their homes it would be an extreme terroristic crime, let alone when they actually go through with the bombing, indiscriminate of who is inside.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/israel...ack-civilians-because-they-deserve-it/5394525