The Envirowhackos are Melting!

● Shot: ‘Climate grief’: The growing emotional toll of climate change — Extreme weather and dire climate reports are intensifying the mental health effects of global warming: depression and resignation about the future.

—Headline and subhead, NBC News, Christmas Eve.

● Chaser: Chuck Todd Bans ‘Climate Deniers’ from Climate Change Special:

Chuck Todd gave a stunning example of the phenomenon this morning in his introduction of a Meet the Press special edition on climate change. Todd quite literally announced that dissent would not be tolerated. Here was Todd:

“Just as important as what we are going to do this hour is what we’re not going to do. We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The Earth is getting hotter, and human activity is a major cause. Period. We’re not going to give time to climate deniers. The science is settled, even if political opinion is not.”

* * * * * * * *

“The epithet ‘climate denier,’ intended to invoke Holocaust denial, has always been tasteless and inapt . . . But climate activists delighted in defining their opposition this way.”

NewsBusters, today.

‘Denier’ is a political term, not a scientific term.
Do you deny that AGW is real and a real problem?


lol.....doesn't matter what we think dummy...….matters what the public thinks as a whole. And of course we know, they don't care much at all. Which makes your question moot.:abgg2q.jpg:
Lol, you guys are being sooooo very careful not to say the "D" word!!

View attachment 237630

Lol....s0n....denier... skeptic.....we are all of those and waaaaay more. What matters is......who's winning!!:2up:
 
So then "denier" is a good term for all of you climate change denying nut-jobs.

Prosecution rests.
 
So then "denier" is a good term for all of you climate change denying nut-jobs.

I would never deny climate ... I pay a lot to vacation in a good one...

2ee402df64d35db681f479dfac7110fb.jpg
 
● Shot: ‘Climate grief’: The growing emotional toll of climate change — Extreme weather and dire climate reports are intensifying the mental health effects of global warming: depression and resignation about the future.

—Headline and subhead, NBC News, Christmas Eve.

● Chaser: Chuck Todd Bans ‘Climate Deniers’ from Climate Change Special:

Chuck Todd gave a stunning example of the phenomenon this morning in his introduction of a Meet the Press special edition on climate change. Todd quite literally announced that dissent would not be tolerated. Here was Todd:

“Just as important as what we are going to do this hour is what we’re not going to do. We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The Earth is getting hotter, and human activity is a major cause. Period. We’re not going to give time to climate deniers. The science is settled, even if political opinion is not.”

* * * * * * * *

“The epithet ‘climate denier,’ intended to invoke Holocaust denial, has always been tasteless and inapt . . . But climate activists delighted in defining their opposition this way.”

NewsBusters, today.

‘Denier’ is a political term, not a scientific term.
Poor little uneducated science deniers
 
● Shot: ‘Climate grief’: The growing emotional toll of climate change — Extreme weather and dire climate reports are intensifying the mental health effects of global warming: depression and resignation about the future.

—Headline and subhead, NBC News, Christmas Eve.

● Chaser: Chuck Todd Bans ‘Climate Deniers’ from Climate Change Special:

Chuck Todd gave a stunning example of the phenomenon this morning in his introduction of a Meet the Press special edition on climate change. Todd quite literally announced that dissent would not be tolerated. Here was Todd:

“Just as important as what we are going to do this hour is what we’re not going to do. We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The Earth is getting hotter, and human activity is a major cause. Period. We’re not going to give time to climate deniers. The science is settled, even if political opinion is not.”

* * * * * * * *

“The epithet ‘climate denier,’ intended to invoke Holocaust denial, has always been tasteless and inapt . . . But climate activists delighted in defining their opposition this way.”

NewsBusters, today.

‘Denier’ is a political term, not a scientific term.
Poor little uneducated science deniers
Yes, Leftards do deny science.
 
That must be why I've posted "www.ipcc.ch" about 200 times while my right wing opponents continuously lie about its contents, accuse the world's scientists of being in a grand and completely unbelievable conspiracy to lie to the public so that they might grow rich somehow on research grants. That would be why the Trump Administration, in a bid to please his base, has destroyed the scientific credentials and cast aside the objective scientific inputs to the White House, the EPA, the FDA, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of the Interior and everywhere else they find objective science interfering with the process of the rich growing richer.
 
Last edited:
● Shot: ‘Climate grief’: The growing emotional toll of climate change — Extreme weather and dire climate reports are intensifying the mental health effects of global warming: depression and resignation about the future.

—Headline and subhead, NBC News, Christmas Eve.

● Chaser: Chuck Todd Bans ‘Climate Deniers’ from Climate Change Special:

Chuck Todd gave a stunning example of the phenomenon this morning in his introduction of a Meet the Press special edition on climate change. Todd quite literally announced that dissent would not be tolerated. Here was Todd:

“Just as important as what we are going to do this hour is what we’re not going to do. We’re not going to debate climate change, the existence of it. The Earth is getting hotter, and human activity is a major cause. Period. We’re not going to give time to climate deniers. The science is settled, even if political opinion is not.”

* * * * * * * *

“The epithet ‘climate denier,’ intended to invoke Holocaust denial, has always been tasteless and inapt . . . But climate activists delighted in defining their opposition this way.”

NewsBusters, today.

‘Denier’ is a political term, not a scientific term.
Do you deny that AGW is real and a real problem?
Of course.
 
People throw around the term 'science' today in the same way the church wielded religion in the Spanish Inquisition (which everyone expected).

By doing so, they can brand unbeliever as heretics and apostates. They can seize land and property and strengthen the authority of the state.

Believing in anything that you don't fully understand, including science, is equivalent to superstition.

Just as faith and religion have different beliefs, science can have different and competitive theories.

Scientists can argue facts and data, but they don't get to declare the skeptics as heretics and condemn them to the metaphorical stake.
 
Why is it this particular topic generates so much personal vitriol from both sides?
The bitching back and forth becomes tedious and convinces nobody of anything.
Meanwhile we all dance on the deck of the Titanic.
 
People throw around the term 'science' today in the same way the church wielded religion in the Spanish Inquisition (which everyone expected).
By doing so, they can brand unbeliever as heretics and apostates. They can seize land and property and strengthen the authority of the state.
Believing in anything that you don't fully understand, including science, is equivalent to superstition.
ust as faith and religion have different beliefs, science can have different and competitive theories.
Scientists can argue facts and data, but they don't get to declare the skeptics as heretics and condemn them to the metaphorical stake.
 

Forum List

Back
Top