IcebergSlim
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 2013
- 10,886
- 9,143
- 2,255
- Banned
- #21
So it's NOT about the "numbers of people" then?Nah. The people who voted far outnumber the billionaires. There may be influence at the top, but in the end it's sheer numbers.“I think there’s no doubt that we reflect the will of the people to an overwhelming extent. I don’t think we were successful in conveying the spirit behind those policies, and I don’t think we were successful in transmitting the urgency behind those policies.”
Everyone understands what you reflect. Because of the results, fewer people are buying it. That's just the way it is, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future.
Biggest Dem donor thinks party needs new message
“I think there’s no doubt that we reflect the will of the people to an overwhelming extent. I don’t think we were successful in conveying the spirit behind those policies, and I don’t think we were successful in transmitting the urgency behind those policies.”
Everyone understands what you reflect. Because of the results, fewer people are buying it. That's just the way it is, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future.
Biggest Dem donor thinks party needs new message
Because of the results, fewer people are buying it.
60%+ of "the people" polled on the question approve of the POTUS who preceded the current occupant.
Of course they do. The polls say so.
The Current Occupant received considerably FEWER of the people's votes than his opponent....
Illegals didn't vote for "The Current Occupant".
What must you tell dirt to change its "mind"?
Apparently not what the Democrats told.![]()
So......post the vote totals for these.......uh.........numbersous "people"......
The Electoral College numbers are all that counts. So shall it remain.