The closest the US government has admitted to the existence of UFO's

[Votto]

Navy Officer Says Underwater UFOs Are Legitimate Threats. The Evidence Is Hard to Ignore.

Some of the most credible encounters with nonhuman aircraft have happened over the world’s oceans. Now, the witnesses want answers.

www.yahoo.com

Object seen on film and by military people see object move in ways that defy explanation, and even fly into the ocean without slowing down and no observable splash even.

Radar locks in on them, and film takes pictures of them, but otherwise are totally mysterious.

 

[MarathonMike]

There are multiple videos of flying "tic tac" shaped objects. A pill shape is about as non-aerodynamic as it gets. No visible exhaust or propulsion.

 

[Votto]

There are multiple videos of flying "tic tac" shaped objects. A pill shape is about as non-aerodynamic as it gets. No visible exhaust or propulsion.

My guess is that they are drones and not manned.

 

[MarathonMike]

My guess is that they are drones and not manned.

There is no drone shaped like a pill, period. Drones have wings and propulsion that would be detected on FLIR cameras. The military videos we are seeing show NO PROPULSION SIGNATURE.

 

[Unkotare]

Can it be a uFo if it's underwater?

 

[toobfreak]

Object seen on film and by military people see object move in ways that defy explanation, Radar locks in on them, and film takes pictures of them, but otherwise are totally mysterious.

Interesting. The one triangular object in the video reminds me of this object I photographed afocally through a telescope back in 2004:

Then there are these images I collected the other day. I think these were shot in Japan, by a person taking a video of a UFO saucer hovering over the ocean, when this lightning bolt struck.

Notice how the bolt was diverted from an otherwise straight line from where it was headed.

Strangely, it almost looks like the lightning bolt was repelled by the ship going around it.

But what really caught my eye was this: After the bolt struck and was done, a second or two later, for just a split second, maybe an eighth of a second, the UFO disappeared. It just blinked off then was back again.

At first I thought it was a defect in the video or something. Here is the split-second frame that the UFO just disappeared.

But upon studying the video, I realized that nothing else other than the saucer disappeared for a split-second or blinked like that. Here is the saucer back after that split second:

One could wonder if somehow the saucer attracted the lightning, expected it and was studying it, if the saucer being there just precipitated the bolt, or whether the bolt being there somehow caused the saucer to blink off and back on again for a split second due to some external stress?

It almost looks like the saucer was exerting some sort of field around it that repelled the lightning forcing it to go around.

 

[Votto]

There is no drone shaped like a pill, period. Drones have wings and propulsion that would be detected on FLIR cameras. The military videos we are seeing show NO PROPULSION SIGNATURE.

Whether manned or not, the technology is not known, at least publicly.

The fact that there are no "windows" fuels my speculation about them not being manned.

Unmanned expeditions are also the travel of choice by NASA, for obvious reasons.

 

[petro]

 

[sparky]

IIRC, ot was the Truman administration in the late 40;s that instituted a national security council

which, in retrospect, was far more protective of our government from 'we the peeps' , thus ending clarity and transparency in said issues

~S~

 

[Silent Warrior]

Can it be a uFo if it's underwater?

It would be a USO. Unidentified Submersible Object.

 

[Unkotare]

It would be a USO. Unidentified Submersible Object.

That's what I become when I try to swim.