The Clinton-Kremlin Connection

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,102
2,645
:rolleyes:How the Clintons Sold Out U.S. National Interests to the Putin Regime

On June 29, 2010, three weeks after Rosatom proposed to Uranium One, Bill Clinton keynoted a seminar staged by Renaissance Capital in Moscow, a reputedly Kremlin-controlled investment bank that promoted this transaction. Renaissance Capital paid Clinton $500,000 for his one-hour speech.


The Clintons’ Neoliberal Dystopian Ties to Russia’s Billionaires

"This courtship of the world’s most wealthy individuals and corporations extended into Russia’s oligarchy. Forbes lists 77 Russian billionaires, and many of them have a relationship with the Clintons. In 2015, The New York Times reported on the ties between the Clinton Foundation and its board member, Canadian Financier Frank Giustra, as a Russian company pushed for control of United States based uranium resources. In 2008, The New York Times reported that Giustra donated millions of dollars to gain access to the Clintons and used his relationship as leverage in a multi-million-dollar uranium deal in the former Soviet Union Republic of Kazakhstan, which Bill Clinton visited with him.

In June 2010, Bill Clinton
visited Moscow to give a keynote speech for $500,000 to Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank owned by Mikhail Prokhorov, who owns the Brooklyn Nets, Barclays Center Arena, and several other entertainment venues in Brooklyn. In 2015, The Wall Street Journal reported that Clinton received a personal thank you note for the speech from Vladimir Putin and a press release from Renaissance Capital noted that the conference was attended by several Russian officials and corporate leaders. However, Clinton’s relationship with Russian elites began long before this speech.

In 2003, Bill Clinton
presented the Golden Plate Award of the International Academy of Achievement in Washington D.C. to billionaire Mikhail Fridman, the founder and owner of the Russia-based Alfa Bank..."


http://nypost.com/2016/07/31/report-raises-questions-about-clinton-cash-from-russians-during-reset/

"Key players in a main component of the reset — a Moscow-based, Silicon Valley-styled campus for developing biomed, space, nuclear and IT technologies called “Skolkovo” — poured tens of millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation, the report by journalist Peter Schweizer alleges.

As the Obama administration’s top diplomat, Hillary Clinton was at the center of US efforts on the reset in general and Skolkovo in particular"


http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

"During a heated Fox Business interview with Maria Bartiromo, Hillary Clinton’s former campaign chief John Podesta made a series of misleading statements when questioned about his involvement in a company that received $35 million from the Russian government while Clinton served as secretary of state.

On Jan. 18, 2011, a small green-energy company named Joule Unlimited announced Podesta’s appointment to its board. Months later, Rusnano, a Kremlin-backed investment fund founded by Vladimir Putin, pumped $35 million into Joule. Serving alongside Podesta on Joule’s board were senior Russian official Anatoly Chubais and oligarch Ruben Vardanyan, who has been appointed by Putin to a Russian economic modernization council.

Bartiromo asked Podesta why he failed to disclose his role in Joule as required by law when he entered the White House in January 2014 to serve as counselor to President Barack Obama.

“Maria, that’s not true. I fully disclosed and was completely compliant,” Podesta shot back.

But according to his own financial disclosure form, Podesta only listed two of the three entities that made up Joule Unlimited, failing to disclose his presence on the board of the Dutch-registered Stichting Joule Global Foundation."



John Podesta and the Russians

"Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta has responded to the WikiLeaks publication of his private emails by suggesting they were stolen by the Russians to elect Donald Trump. What he doesn’t like to talk about is the business he’s done with a Kremlin-backed investment firm and the lengths he’s gone to avoid scrutiny of this relationship"


EXCLUSIVE: John Podesta May Have Been Target Of Russian ‘Influence Campaign’

"Podesta’s Russian connection is also a family affair, as his brother Tony lobbied for the sale of Uranium One to Rusatom, Russia’s atomic agency, a transaction which occurred between 2009 and 2013. The sale gave Moscow control of one-fifth of America’s domestic uranium production capacity."


EXCLUSIVE: Podesta Didn’t Register As A ‘Foreign Agent’ When He Represented A Bank With Ties To Russian Spy Agencies

"Democratic super lobbyist Tony Podesta failed to register under the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) when he agreed to represent Sberbank, Russia’s largest bank.

Sberbank allegedly has close ties to Russia’s intelligence services...Sberbank was once known informally as the “KGB bank,” and now has a reputation for close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin and to Russian intelligence services."


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/former-presidents-putin-and-clinton-talk-russian-spy-arrests/

"Clinton followed Putin, stating that he was also encouraged that "relations between American and Russia will be getting better and better. I frequently addressed our government with request to speed up Russia's entry into the WTO."

Russia has been seeking entry into the World Trade Organization for years.
President Medvedev's meeting with President Obama last week resulted in an agreement that will allow U.S. exports of poultry to Russia, which had been a roadblock in Russia's WTO bid."

The fact that the Clinton Foundation was receiving generous donations and Putin Ex-KGB Pals hired him to give speeches had absolutely nothing to do with Bill Clinton wanting to do such a big favor for Putin...
 
For being so concerned about America's national security and safety, believing Russia to be such a threat, the Clintons and their associates sure made a lot of money / profit working with / for the Russians.

:rolleyes:
 
There is 1 problem with your analysis. The Kremlin clearly wanted Trump to win and did everything they could to help. If the Clintons are so close to Russia then why did they not help her?
 
The Kremlin clearly wanted Trump to win and did everything they could to help.

Thank you for sharing that amazing information - can you please scan and post the letter they sent you admitting that? I figure YOU have to have the only evidence of this because, as pointed out, Democrats have been unable to provide any evidence of what you claim.

WHY would the Russians bother to waste time trying to hack the DNC's e-mails when they could have just contacted Debbie Wasserman Schultz and her Pakistani Spy, Awan, whom she gave access to DNC e-mails, their usernames, and passwords?!

Awan was so much about money that the Russians could have paid him a chunk of change and gotten whatever they wanted...if DWS and Awan wasn't already working for them.
 
There is 1 problem with your analysis. The Kremlin clearly wanted Trump to win and did everything they could to help. If the Clintons are so close to Russia then why did they not help her?
The Russians goals were to create distrust between the people and it's government. If you read all the leftist posts here you can tell they achieved that goal via lemmings too stupid to realize they're doing Russia's bidding.
As to Trump you may be right about them wanting him to win as they may have thought he'd be an easy pushover. That means NOTHING in the grand scheme of things unless you are one of the lemmings mentioned above. ALL governments, including ours, attempt to influence other elections in order to achieve certain goals. This is nothing new, it's just that emotionally shattered leftists are trying to use it as a scapegoat for their election loss.

All of this is easy to figure out for anyone capable of critical thinking and a bit of honesty, thus it leaves a lot of this board in la-la land.
 
For being so concerned about America's national security and safety, believing Russia to be such a threat, the Clintons and their associates sure made a lot of money / profit working with / for the Russians.

:rolleyes:

I'll bet you think all your deflection makes Trump less guilty, eh?
 
I'll bet you think all your deflection makes Trump less guilty, eh?
I bet you still think that without any evidence of even a crime having been committed, let alone Trump involvement, that Trump is 'guilty'.

Bwuhahahaha........
 
There is 1 problem with your analysis. The Kremlin clearly wanted Trump to win and did everything they could to help. If the Clintons are so close to Russia then why did they not help her?
+1
putin´s LDPR party, drunk 136 battles of Cristal after Trump victory


wx1080.jpg


1935.jpg


_93109033_putin_trupm_ap.jpg
 
For being so concerned about America's national security and safety, believing Russia to be such a threat, the Clintons and their associates sure made a lot of money / profit working with / for the Russians.

:rolleyes:

I'll bet you think all your deflection makes Trump less guilty, eh?
Less guilty of what? What crime was he charged or convicted of?
Thinking he's guilty of a crime =/= being guilty of a crime.
 
The Russians goals were to create distrust between the people and it's government.
And liberals / snowflakes have been willing collaborators in order to defend their criminal nominee and attack Trump for Party benefit.
 
For being so concerned about America's national security and safety, believing Russia to be such a threat, the Clintons and their associates sure made a lot of money / profit working with / for the Russians.

:rolleyes:

I'll bet you think all your deflection makes Trump less guilty, eh?
Less guilty of what? What crime was he charged or convicted of?
Thinking he's guilty of a crime =/= being guilty of a crime.

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Trump's frightening and tightening legal noose
 
For being so concerned about America's national security and safety, believing Russia to be such a threat, the Clintons and their associates sure made a lot of money / profit working with / for the Russians.

:rolleyes:

I'll bet you think all your deflection makes Trump less guilty, eh?
Less guilty of what? What crime was he charged or convicted of?
Thinking he's guilty of a crime =/= being guilty of a crime.

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Trump's frightening and tightening legal noose
An opinion. No more valid than any other opinion.

Do you understand what an opinion is? Do you remember his opinion on Hillary?
 
For being so concerned about America's national security and safety, believing Russia to be such a threat, the Clintons and their associates sure made a lot of money / profit working with / for the Russians.

:rolleyes:

I'll bet you think all your deflection makes Trump less guilty, eh?
Less guilty of what? What crime was he charged or convicted of?
Thinking he's guilty of a crime =/= being guilty of a crime.

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Trump's frightening and tightening legal noose
An opinion. No more valid than any other opinion.

Do you understand what an opinion is? Do you remember his opinion on Hillary?

I know the difference between a sound legal opinion and the opinion of Trump cultists.
 
For being so concerned about America's national security and safety, believing Russia to be such a threat, the Clintons and their associates sure made a lot of money / profit working with / for the Russians.

:rolleyes:

I'll bet you think all your deflection makes Trump less guilty, eh?
Less guilty of what? What crime was he charged or convicted of?
Thinking he's guilty of a crime =/= being guilty of a crime.

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Trump's frightening and tightening legal noose
An opinion. No more valid than any other opinion.

Do you understand what an opinion is? Do you remember his opinion on Hillary?

I know the difference between a sound legal opinion and the opinion of Trump cultists.
Sound legal opinion eh? Like when he thought Hillary should be charged & convicted? That kind of sound legal opinion?
 
what cracks me up the most is all this is fine. none of it is an issue.

but "super secret meetings" are evidence to some of wrong doing.
 
There is 1 problem with your analysis. The Kremlin clearly wanted Trump to win and did everything they could to help. If the Clintons are so close to Russia then why did they not help her?


No.....you are wrong, they had already bought and paid for hilary.......to the tune of 145 million dollars....they wanted her to win, they just wanted to weaken her hand even more. Everyone expected her to win easily......even the Russians.
 
I'll bet you think all your deflection makes Trump less guilty, eh?
Less guilty of what? What crime was he charged or convicted of?
Thinking he's guilty of a crime =/= being guilty of a crime.

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Trump's frightening and tightening legal noose
An opinion. No more valid than any other opinion.

Do you understand what an opinion is? Do you remember his opinion on Hillary?

I know the difference between a sound legal opinion and the opinion of Trump cultists.
Sound legal opinion eh? Like when he thought Hillary should be charged & convicted? That kind of sound legal opinion?

Even the a stopped clock is right once a day. :lol:

It's not just Napolitano that is saying it. He's just a voice y'all in your bubble will listen to.
 

Forum List

Back
Top