"The Billionaire Behind Britain's Digital ID"

Should babies be I. D. chipped?

  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, this will make kids less easy to be kidnapped.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, this will help the police to find them later on if they get into trouble.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Maybe??? There are both positives as well as negatives?!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • What about chipping the printed currency notes, rather than babies?

    Votes: 1 100.0%

  • Total voters
    1

DennisPTate

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2025
Messages
2,930
Reaction score
1,129
Points
163
What effect will a digital I.D. probably have on England?

Will a digital I. D. make it nearly impossible to be a successful criminal, [unless you are perhaps connected with MI5 or the British Secret Service somehow]?

You would think that the London "mafia" would be on the side of the ordinary Brits when it comes to this topic?

How many billions and billions will the billionaires have to pass out to the leaders in organized crime to convince them to support a "digital I. D.?"




"The Billionaire Behind Britain's Digital ID"​


" I have spent the last five weeks trying to write about the UK Digital ID, and every time I sat down to finish, I found another thread. Another connection. Another name that linked back to the same technocratic megalomaniacs I keep writing about in America. At some point I had to accept that this was not a story about Britain at all, or at least not only about Britain; it was the same story I have been telling for months now, just with different accents. The machinery is identical, like the same word written in different fonts, or in this case, the same name:

Larry Ellison. (I am once again asking the techno-fascism genre to introduce a new antagonist.)

To bring you up to date: in January of this year, nearly three million British citizens signed a petition opposing mandatory digital ID, making it one of the largest petition responses in the country’s history, and the government folded, or at least it seemed that way. Keir Starmer announced that digital ID would now be optional, the newspapers declared victory, democracy had worked, and everyone could go back to their lives feeling good about the system."

 
The stupid British elected Sir Queer Harmer as our leader and PM thinking that they were replacing a useless Conservative bunch of Clowns with something more representative and left wing oriented .
Our own Turdy Tommy was as vocal a supporter of these as any hysterical individual could be , which gave you a guarantee that voting for UK Labour would be a disaster .
It was .And remains so .

And now you have the worst ever UK Prime Minister ( on a par with Dementia Ridden Biden).
Deep State . 100%
Team GBs version of pervert Deep State Macaroon in France .


It is relatively academic where Deep State sponsorship is coming from , though OP may well be right that Larry Ellison is a leading figure , if not the prime mover .

But most important by far ;-
Get rid of this Deep State Government spearheaded by their old Poster Boy --- Sir Queer Harmer.
 
Rumours are that Starmer may resign soon, my sources say within hours.

We will see if this is accurate or not.
 
What effect will a digital I.D. probably have on England?

Will a digital I. D. make it nearly impossible to be a successful criminal, [unless you are perhaps connected with MI5 or the British Secret Service somehow]?

You would think that the London "mafia" would be on the side of the ordinary Brits when it comes to this topic?

How many billions and billions will the billionaires have to pass out to the leaders in organized crime to convince them to support a "digital I. D.?"
Hmm, you obviously don't realise the UK digital ID idea was scrapped.
 
Back
Top Bottom