That didn't take long, enviros suing Trump over repeal of climate endangerment finding

EMH

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2021
Messages
30,859
Reaction score
18,217
Points
2,788
And here we go again. Trump EOs don't last long. Congress needs to stamp its approval. But Congress with Mike and Thune doesn't do jack.

So Trump removes endangerment finding, and to the surprise of absolutely nobody with an IQ over 5....





So now back to Pam Bondi. Does Pam Bondi want to bust CO2 FRAUD?

We know the case has been there for 15 years...



Pam was sworn in a year ago. The transition, led by Blanche, is four months older. Still, NOTHING.... Prosecuting the crimes against the author of the scientific analysis and theory of that case.... still, NOTHING...


The Dems know where they want the game to be played, in a DC court with Pam "Kamala of the GOP" Bondi in charge of the other side. Will Pam have the author of the case Obama hid there to argue it?

LOL!!!


Just like Epstein, if it is treason, Pam Bondi covers up and sides with Alliance for Treason. Until there is evidence to the contrary, that is the take here.


All the work Trump and Zeldin just did means nothing, because Pam Bondi is on the other side...
 
And here we go again. Trump EOs don't last long. Congress needs to stamp its approval. But Congress with Mike and Thune doesn't do jack.

So Trump removes endangerment finding, and to the surprise of absolutely nobody with an IQ over 5....





So now back to Pam Bondi. Does Pam Bondi want to bust CO2 FRAUD?

We know the case has been there for 15 years...



Pam was sworn in a year ago. The transition, led by Blanche, is four months older. Still, NOTHING.... Prosecuting the crimes against the author of the scientific analysis and theory of that case.... still, NOTHING...


The Dems know where they want the game to be played, in a DC court with Pam "Kamala of the GOP" Bondi in charge of the other side. Will Pam have the author of the case Obama hid there to argue it?

LOL!!!


Just like Epstein, if it is treason, Pam Bondi covers up and sides with Alliance for Treason. Until there is evidence to the contrary, that is the take here.


All the work Trump and Zeldin just did means nothing, because Pam Bondi is on the other side...


This is excellent! Just as the Democratic Party calls for the release of the Epstein Files set the stage for the arrest of Prince Andrew and the release of lots of video so also this lawsuit will set the stage for a Class Action Lawsuit against the Ottawa Swamp and the Washington Swamp for the way that flawed data was interpreted by elected officials and bureaucrats into horrible policies that led to the Supply Chain Crisis of the past few years.


Rest assured that P. M. Mark Carney wanted to keep the Carbon Tax personally but he knew that his political career would be over if he had not:


Following high-profile political campaigns, the federal consumer carbon tax was eliminated in April 2025 by the new government, though industrial pricing remains. Amid an affordability crisis, many Canadians became tired of the tax, citing high fuel costs and questioning its effectiveness, with 68% of respondents in a 2024 poll indicating they believed the tax was ineffective. While the tax was designed with rebates, a 2030 projection suggested a net loss for many households.
inFocus with David Coletto +4
Key Aspects of the Anti-Carbon Tax Sentiment:
  • "Axe the Tax" Campaign: Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre successfully made the repeal of the tax a central, popular, and polarizing issue, leading to the removal of the consumer-level charge in 2025.
  • Affordability Concerns: Many Canadians, particularly in western provinces, felt the tax increased the cost of daily life, including gas and home heating, during a period of high inflation.
  • Effectiveness Skepticism: Nearly half of Canadians surveyed by Nanos in late 2023 believed the tax was ineffective at fighting climate change, even as emissions decreased slightly.
  • Provincial Opposition: Seven premiers spoke out against the tax, urging for a pause or elimination of the scheduled increases.
    Facebook +5
Impact of Removing the Consumer Carbon Tax:
  • Immediate Costs: Gas prices dropped by approximately 10 to 15 cents per litre in some areas immediately following the elimination of the federal fuel charge.
  • Lost Rebates: The removal of the tax also means the end of the quarterly Canada Carbon Rebate, which, according to some analyses, was higher than the cost paid for 80% of households.
  • Economic Impact: While popular, some analysts argue removing the tax takes Canada a step back on its climate goals and may not significantly improve the long-term financial situation for lower-income households that relied on the rebates.
  • Industrial Focus: The industrial carbon price, which impacts large emitters, remains in place and is a focus for future policy discussions.
    The Hill Times +2
Public Sentiment Trends:
  • Shift in Priority: Recent polling has indicated a shift from prioritizing environmental action to focusing on cost-of-living concerns, with 60% of Canadians prioritizing jobs over climate action, according to data from 2025.
  • Communication Gaps: The policy was often perceived as a simple "tax" rather than a "rebate" system, which contributed to public dissatisfaction.
  • Regional Differences: Opposition was stronger in Western Canada and the Prairies compared to other regions
 
And here we go again. Trump EOs don't last long. Congress needs to stamp its approval. But Congress with Mike and Thune doesn't do jack.

So Trump removes endangerment finding, and to the surprise of absolutely nobody with an IQ over 5....





So now back to Pam Bondi. Does Pam Bondi want to bust CO2 FRAUD?

We know the case has been there for 15 years...



Pam was sworn in a year ago. The transition, led by Blanche, is four months older. Still, NOTHING.... Prosecuting the crimes against the author of the scientific analysis and theory of that case.... still, NOTHING...


The Dems know where they want the game to be played, in a DC court with Pam "Kamala of the GOP" Bondi in charge of the other side. Will Pam have the author of the case Obama hid there to argue it?

LOL!!!


Just like Epstein, if it is treason, Pam Bondi covers up and sides with Alliance for Treason. Until there is evidence to the contrary, that is the take here.


All the work Trump and Zeldin just did means nothing, because Pam Bondi is on the other side...
LOL Well if you like more lead and mercury in your food and atmosphere, Trump is your buddy. But fools like you will probably insist that it does no harm. Ah well, fools and idiots we will always have with us, until they win a Darwin Award.
 
LOL Well if you like more lead and mercury in your food and atmosphere, Trump is your buddy. But fools like you will probably insist that it does no harm. Ah well, fools and idiots we will always have with us, until they win a Darwin Award.


All these "threats" and the only way to "save us" is to spend spend spend spend, and don't ask any questions....


Do you work for a climate "non profit" getting $500k per year?
 
This is excellent! Just as the Democratic Party calls for the release of the Epstein Files set the stage for the arrest of Prince Andrew and the release of lots of video so also this lawsuit will set the stage for a Class Action Lawsuit against the Ottawa Swamp and the Washington Swamp for the way that flawed data was interpreted by elected officials and bureaucrats into horrible policies that led to the Supply Chain Crisis of the past few years.


Rest assured that P. M. Mark Carney wanted to keep the Carbon Tax personally but he knew that his political career would be over if he had not:



Dennis, we, the American People, and the rest of the sane world, need to "beat down" the CO2 FRAUD in this lawsuit. You don't see anyone "refuting" a word of what I post. The question is whether Pam Bondi wants to win, not whether she can win, she can, easily, just get the author of what caused this...


 
All these "threats" and the only way to "save us" is to spend spend spend spend, and don't ask any questions....


Do you work for a climate "non profit" getting $500k per year?
Is everything a conspiracy to you? Lol
 
And here we go again. Trump EOs don't last long. Congress needs to stamp its approval. But Congress with Mike and Thune doesn't do jack.

So Trump removes endangerment finding, and to the surprise of absolutely nobody with an IQ over 5....





So now back to Pam Bondi. Does Pam Bondi want to bust CO2 FRAUD?

We know the case has been there for 15 years...



Pam was sworn in a year ago. The transition, led by Blanche, is four months older. Still, NOTHING.... Prosecuting the crimes against the author of the scientific analysis and theory of that case.... still, NOTHING...


The Dems know where they want the game to be played, in a DC court with Pam "Kamala of the GOP" Bondi in charge of the other side. Will Pam have the author of the case Obama hid there to argue it?

LOL!!!


Just like Epstein, if it is treason, Pam Bondi covers up and sides with Alliance for Treason. Until there is evidence to the contrary, that is the take here.


All the work Trump and Zeldin just did means nothing, because Pam Bondi is on the other side...
Do we not care about our grandchildren?
 
Do we not care about our grandchildren?
You're talking to somebody that eyeballs hurricane damage and then argues there's a conspiracy because the reported strength of the hurricane doesn't match his perception of what the damage should look like.

Just so you know.
 
You're talking to somebody that eyeballs hurricane damage and then argues there's a conspiracy because the reported strength of the hurricane doesn't match his perception of what the damage should look like.

Just so you know.



Science has properties.

Force and size matter.

When a Cat 5 comes ashore as a Cat 5, it levels all trees and wooden buildings. There were a handful of trees down on Jamaica, 95%+ of trees are still standing, because no Cat 5 came ashore, a Cat 1 did...
 
Science has properties.

Force and size matter.

When a Cat 5 comes ashore as a Cat 5, it levels all trees and wooden buildings. There were a handful of trees down on Jamaica, 95%+ of trees are still standing, because no Cat 5 came ashore, a Cat 1 did...
Eyeballing destruction isn’t a reliable measure of wind speed. Meteorologists calculate hurricane categories based on sustained wind measurements, central pressure, and satellite/airborne reconnaissance, not tree damage alone.

Local terrain, building standards, and even the timing of gusts can make a Cat 5 appear much weaker in some spots. The physical definition of a Category 5 isn’t “everything is flattened everywhere,” it’s sustained winds ≥157 mph. Damage patterns are too variable to substitute for instrumentation.
 
Eyeballing destruction isn’t a reliable measure of wind speed. Meteorologists calculate hurricane categories based on sustained wind measurements, central pressure, and satellite/airborne reconnaissance, not tree damage alone.

Local terrain, building standards, and even the timing of gusts can make a Cat 5 appear much weaker in some spots. The physical definition of a Category 5 isn’t “everything is flattened everywhere,” it’s sustained winds ≥157 mph. Damage patterns are too variable to substitute for instrumentation.


The NWS lied, it lied in concert with a slew of BS Climate media noise that, despite no increase in the number of canes, we are getting "more Cat 5s" because NWS is lying and fudging data to help CO2 FRAUD.

A Cat 5 makes landfall it does Cat 5 damage.

The cane that hit Jamaica did Cat 1 damage.
 
Fraud? Science, facts, chemistry,


DATA...

ACTUAL DATA, not FUDGE....

do you even understand the difference between the two??


 
The NWS lied, it lied in concert with a slew of BS Climate media noise that, despite no increase in the number of canes, we are getting "more Cat 5s" because NWS is lying and fudging data to help CO2 FRAUD.

A Cat 5 makes landfall it does Cat 5 damage.

The cane that hit Jamaica did Cat 1 damage.
A Category 5 isn’t defined by whether every tree or building is flattened. Just because Jamaica saw mostly minor damage doesn’t mean the official wind speeds were wrong, or that the NWS is lying. Eyeballing destruction is not a valid substitute for the measured meteorological criteria.
 
The NWS lied, it lied in concert with a slew of BS Climate media noise that, despite no increase in the number of canes, we are getting "more Cat 5s" because NWS is lying and fudging data to help CO2 FRAUD.

A Cat 5 makes landfall it does Cat 5 damage.

The cane that hit Jamaica did Cat 1 damage.
The record # of super typhoons this year shows this is one planet one people.
China and Vietnam are much better than America at preparing for typhoons.
If get hit with more than 2 cat 5’s this year on top of $5 a gallon gas
 
15th post
A Category 5 isn’t defined by whether every tree or building is flattened.



Was it a firecracker or a nuclear bomb?

Well, it left some burnt paper and made a small bang, but didn't damage anything...

Well, the top climate scientists say it was a nuclear bomb, and the fact that it did no damage doesn't disprove that....


WHAT YOU ARE ARGUING HERE....
 
Was it a firecracker or a nuclear bomb?

Well, it left some burnt paper and made a small bang, but didn't damage anything...

Well, the top climate scientists say it was a nuclear bomb, and the fact that it did no damage doesn't disprove that....


WHAT YOU ARE ARGUING HERE....
A Cat 5 is defined by sustained wind speed and pressure, not by the pattern of damage. Observing light damage doesn’t change the wind measurements.
 
Observing light damage doesn’t change the wind measurements.


So we are really to believe that when Melissa came ashore, there really were 150+ mph sustained winds, except they did not knock down the vast majority of trees, just the oppositek, and wooden shacks were still standing after being hit by those winds...


not a sane answer
 
Back
Top Bottom