Terrorized Pro-Life Activist who was mauled by Democrat SWAT teams, along with his children, for peacefully protesting at abortion clinics testifies

Mr. Friscus

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2020
Messages
7,760
Reaction score
8,247
Points
2,138
A Christian pro-life father of 11 described before Congress on Wednesday the armed FBI raid on his home in Tennessee after the Biden administration brought charges against him over a peaceful pro-life protest. Paul Vaughn, of Centerville, Tennessee, appeared before the House Judiciary Committee on the Constitution and Limited Government on Wednesday to speak about his experience being prosecuted by the Justice Department under the FACE Act. The FACE Act is a Clinton-era law that was supposedly to protect both abortion facilities and churches from violence. In practice, the law has been used by the Biden administration to prosecute peaceful pro-life activists across the country.

The FBI arrested Vaughn on October 5, 2022, after he was involved in a peaceful protest at the Carafem abortion facility in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, in March 2021, where protesters prayed and sang Christian hymns. Vaughn was charged with violating the FACE Act and engaging in a conspiracy against rights, a Reconstruction-era charge meant to crack down on violence by the Ku Klux Klan.

“My house was assaulted, my wife and children were terrorized, and I was kidnapped at gunpoint by four armed men,” Vaughn told lawmakers of the arrest. “I had just sent three of my children to the car so I could take them to school when the house began to shake from a loud banging near the front door. I heard men shouting from my front porch, ‘Open up! FBI!’” Vaughn said that he saw two unmarked SUVs with flashing lights outside his home and men with automatic rifles and a pistol aimed at his door.

“I opened the curtains on my front door to find three men with guns trained on the front door,” he said, adding that the federal agents did not identify themselves. “I later learned at the same time three of my children, ages 12, 14, and 18, were being detained in the side yard on the edge of the woods by a fourth armed man. I was taken without the presentation of a warrant or identification when requested. Make no mistake: this was an armed conflict and I was unarmed. Lethal force was abused to abridge my God-given and constitutionally secured rights
.”


This was a complete abuse of power and proof of major DOJ targeting of conservatives, using an out-dated law to do so.

This guy's house was raided with armed SWAT teams, guns raised, his kids and family terrorized.. for what? There are thousands of BLM rioters who assaulted police and committed violent crimes who were released immediately from jail (we know their info!)

Yet... SWAT teams for people who simply protested in front of abortion clinics. LOL
 
Vaughn and others obstructed access to a clinic. He had a trial and avoided prison time.
Care to use that framing on other instances? LMAO

I'm sure they physically prevented people from entering the building? Oh wait, no, they didn't.

They stood on the sidewalk, and activists walked into them and said "I'm being obstructed!!!".. and the then-woke system angrily applied max force onto the people they hated.
 
Care to use that framing on other instances? LMAO

I'm sure they physically prevented people from entering the building? Oh wait, no, they didn't.

They stood on the sidewalk, and activists walked into them and said "I'm being obstructed!!!".. and the then-woke system angrily applied max force onto the people they hated.
He should have minded his own business.
 
This guy's house was raided with armed SWAT teams, guns raised, his kids and family terrorized..

Ask the obama-biden goon squad

Thats quite an overreaction
So? He didn't get shot like a lot of people do when they get raided.
 
Are you saying he shouldn’t have exercised his First Amendment right to protest?
The man is described as an activist. I presume he knew all about the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act or should have known.
 
The man is described as an activist. I presume he knew all about the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act or should have known.
Irrelevant. These concerns are immaterial to the idea that he “should have minded his own business”.

The question is not whether or not he should have been there, the question is whether or not he should have obstructed access to the clinic.
 
Irrelevant. These concerns are immaterial to the idea that he “should have minded his own business”.

The question is not whether or not he should have been there, the question is whether or not he should have obstructed access to the clinic.
A jury found him guilty.
 
So? He didn't get shot like a lot of people do when they get raided.
~~~~~~
Do you mean like WACO and Ruby Ridge? Or how about LaVoy Finicum ambushed and murdered by the FBI HRT team..
 
A jury found him guilty.
Irrelevant. It is still immaterial to the question of whether not he should have been there or should have “minded his own business”.

The First Amendment guarantees us the right to protest so whether Vaughn minds his own business or not is moot.
 
Irrelevant. It is still immaterial to the question of whether not he should have been there or should have “minded his own business”.

The First Amendment guarantees us the right to protest so whether Vaughn minds his own business or not is moot.
The FACE Act was created to protect the public from fanatics like Vaughn. Deal with it.
 
The FACE Act was created to protect the public from fanatics like Vaughn. Deal with it.
Deal with what? This is not about Vaughn’s guilt or innocence and I never said a word one way or the other about it.

This is about your apparent disregard for Vaughn’s First Amendment right to protest.

If you had said: “He shouldn’t have obstructed the entrance to the clinic.”, you would be right.

But you said: “He should have minded his own business.”

There is a distinction here you are overlooking.
 
Deal with what? This is not about Vaughn’s guilt or innocence and I never said a word one way or the other about it.

This is about your apparent disregard for Vaughn’s First Amendment right to protest.

If you had said: “He shouldn’t have obstructed the entrance to the clinic.”, you would be right.

But you said: “He should have minded his own business.”

There is a distinction here you are overlooking.
Deal with the fact that anti abortion fanatics are out there that get into people's faces, trying to prevent them from entering a clinic and spewing their stupid Jesus shit. If you don't like abortion, don't get one and leave other people alone.
 
Back
Top Bottom