1) the first linked post below -- links to post #47 with a time stamp of 8:58 pacific time, and has an edit at 9:02 pt.
2) post #48 in that other thread has a time stamp of 8:59 pt
(this is where I reveal to divecon that he has been had/made/duped/baghed)
3) post #49 at 9:01 is where I say this is priceless. and it is when the new thread window is already open and started.
4) 9:01 is where divecon, not knowing the flame thread is coming starts back tracking to post #43 -- on another page -- way back in order to make it look like he saw his error
(after saying Dante was the one slow on comprehension
)
and edited it before, but his edit is plainly 2 minutes after I post the evidence. he doesn't get to the second edit on post #47 until 9:02...that is used in the new thread above post #49 -- which was posted as I was starting the new thread.
I bagged divecon trying to make IT look like he had caught his errors before I posted them.
why?
because we were saying each other was the one struggling with reading and comprehension.
fact: divecon kept insisting that the woman was NOT a tea party whacko.
fact: he posted the phrase:
"when she was able to convince her Democratic colleagues to pass tougher sentencing legislation" in post #38 as a reply to
"how the **** could this be considered receiving favorable treatment? is this polito woman a tea party whacko?" in post #33
fact: his words were:
"i'd say no".
conclusion:
he misunderstood what he was reading.
An Exchange with DiveCon? Priceless!
actually it is
but clearly it isnt YOURS
sorry, my mistake
her site didnt actually say, but i took it to say she was a dem, but she isnt
Karyn Polito - Ballotpedia
wingnut power on display. it takes a beating and keeps on ticking...
priceless.