Susan Rice's intimidating threats.

[LeftofLeft]

She did say that a lot of the lawlessness of the Trump regime will not go unpunished.

Unmasking Intelligence is lawlessness.

 

[Mac-7]

“lawfare” is what you call consequences for breaking the law.

Because you don’t think the law applies to your side.

That would be crazy social justice warriors using s car recklessly to impede ICE from doing their job

 

[Marener]

That would be crazy social justice warriors using s car recklessly to impede ICE from doing their job

Your side wailed and moaned when a man was being prosecuted for beating Capitol Police with a baseball bat.

Your side said he was a patriot being persecuted by Biden.

Your side pardoned him.

 

[Mac-7]

Your side wailed and moaned when a man was being prosecuted for beating Capitol Police with a baseball bat.

Your side said he was a patriot being persecuted by Biden.

Your side pardoned him.

Not at all

But when you began holding people in solitary confinement or sending them to prison for trespassing THAT was invonstitutional

 

[Marener]

Not at all

But when you began holding people in solitary confinement or sending them to prison for trespassing THAT was invonstitutional

Sending people to prison for trespassing?

Last I checked trespassing was a crime.

Here’s a prime example of thinking the law doesn’t apply to you.

 

[Mac-7]

Sending people to prison for trespassing?

Last I checked trespassing was a crime.

Here’s a prime example of thinking the law doesn’t apply to you.

Its not a prison offense

Maybe a small fine and a few weekends of community service

 

[Marener]

Its not a prison offense

Maybe a small fine and a few weekends of community service

Sometimes it is. Depends on the circumstances.

Especially when the trespassing comes about as part of a violent entry and a riot.

Prison is a suitable punishment and co duster with the law.

But you guys thought they shouldn’t even be prosecuted. Because the law doesn’t apply.

 

[drudge X]

We all know that MAGA doesn’t think the law applies to them.

You own a mirror? If not, I am more than happy to buy you one.

 

[Marener]

You own a mirror? If not, I am more than happy to buy you one.

Oh please. Do tell.

 

[drudge X]

Oh please. Do tell.

Your denial is glaring.

 

[Churchill]

susan rice's warning video - Search Videos

Watch videos instantly on Bing—enjoy direct playback, discover related clips, and dive into trending content all in one place.

www.bing.com

Have you noticed that some of the world’s most evil people believe they are doing good? I offer Susan Rice as an example. She has just issued a stark warning; it was oddly unprofessional and chillingly retaliatory. Threatened aggression on the part of educated, elevated leadership is not seen often in free societies, but there it was in naked reality. What Rice was saying was essentially that lawfare, boycotts, and government raids will be brought to bear on anyone or any industry that supported Donald Trump. Why? Because they do not like Trump or his MAGA minions so in the name of official, righteous goodness, they must all be destroyed by any means possible. You can’t get much plainer than that.

Donald Trump’s capture of blue-collar America is seen as a grave threat to a new world order, and pompous US elites realized that his re-election signaled a mass repudiation of corrupt elitism. Everything that corrupt elitism stands for in America is on the brink of exposure and collapse, so all the stops are now pulled to take down the middle class thinking energized by Trump.

Rice’s use of zero-sum virtue signaling should serve as warning to all who want to live in a peaceful, free country where the collective wisdom of the people is reflected in how they vote. Rice’s menacing proclamation should be seen as a last-ditch coercive attack on strays from the herd mentality necessary to maintain an obedient population; the kind of population that will genuflect out of fear to a new world order.

Listen to Rice’s words; she means what she says. She and others will go after anyone, any business, or any organization that defied the thought-police trajectory of a one world government.

That should send shivers down the spines of average people.

Can you please actually quote the woman and indicate the time into the video where she speaks the words you are finding so offensive?

Your entire post is just paraphrasing, your words not hers.

 

[Marener]

Your denial is glaring.

I’d love to hear the substance of your argument.

Are you scared to explain further?

 

[Mac-7]

Sometimes it is. Depends on the circumstances.

Especially when the trespassing comes about as part of a violent entry and a riot.

Prison is a suitable punishment and co duster with the law.

But you guys thought they shouldn’t even be prosecuted. Because the law doesn’t apply.

I dont mind punishment that fits the crime

Most protestors simply walked through an open door

They deserved a slap on the wrist

 

[Marener]

I dont mind punishment that fits the crime

Most protestors simply walked through an open door

They deserved a slap on the wrist

They were part of a riot that had beaten those doors down to stop the democratic process.

Calling it simply trespassing is delusional.

Spending a little time in prison fits the crime just fine.

 

[Raynine]

They were part of a riot that had beaten those doors down to stop the democratic process.

Calling it simply trespassing is delusional.

Spending a little time in prison fits the crime just fine.

Do you believe the part where they beat a guy with a fire extinguisher?

 

[Mac-7]

They were part of a riot that had beaten those doors down to stop the democratic process.

Calling it simply trespassing is delusional.

Spending a little time in prison fits the crime just fine.

The doors were not destroyed or even damaged

 

[drudge X]

I’d love to hear the substance of your argument.

Are you scared to explain further?

What’s there for me explain unless you believe Democrats never broke the law?

 

[Mick2]

“lawfare” is what you call consequences for breaking the law.

When Dems throw 91 separate felony indictments at the opposite party's candidate (and fail in all 91 counts) in a grotesque effort to use the criminal justice system to remove their biggest political threat they've committed lawfare.

When they use the law to fine their biggest political threat $500 million and cripple him financially...only to have it entirely struck down on appeal because it was unconstitutional....they've committed lawfare.

When they use dem political appointees and judges to try to take Trump off the ballot and to deny the people's political voices at the ballot box they've committed lawfare. The Supreme Court later struck this down by a humiliating 9-0 decision.

GTFO here with your lawfare shit

 

[Mac-7]

susan rice's warning video - Search Videos

Watch videos instantly on Bing—enjoy direct playback, discover related clips, and dive into trending content all in one place.

www.bing.com

Have you noticed that some of the world’s most evil people believe they are doing good? I offer Susan Rice as an example. She has just issued a stark warning; it was oddly unprofessional and chillingly retaliatory. Threatened aggression on the part of educated, elevated leadership is not seen often in free societies, but there it was in naked reality. What Rice was saying was essentially that lawfare, boycotts, and government raids will be brought to bear on anyone or any industry that supported Donald Trump. Why? Because they do not like Trump or his MAGA minions so in the name of official, righteous goodness, they must all be destroyed by any means possible. You can’t get much plainer than that.

Donald Trump’s capture of blue-collar America is seen as a grave threat to a new world order, and pompous US elites realized that his re-election signaled a mass repudiation of corrupt elitism. Everything that corrupt elitism stands for in America is on the brink of exposure and collapse, so all the stops are now pulled to take down the middle class thinking energized by Trump.

Rice’s use of zero-sum virtue signaling should serve as warning to all who want to live in a peaceful, free country where the collective wisdom of the people is reflected in how they vote. Rice’s menacing proclamation should be seen as a last-ditch coercive attack on strays from the herd mentality necessary to maintain an obedient population; the kind of population that will genuflect out of fear to a new world order.

Listen to Rice’s words; she means what she says. She and others will go after anyone, any business, or any organization that defied the thought-police trajectory of a one world government.

That should send shivers down the spines of average people.

This woman is such a liar

ICE does not enter private homes without a warrant

 

[drudge X]

Sending people to prison for trespassing?

Last I checked trespassing was a crime.

Here’s a prime example of thinking the law doesn’t apply to you.

Great, tell us how many of the looters and rioters received reward from Democrats by not serving time.